Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

AMBP vs SON

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
AMBP
Ardagh Metal Packaging S.A.

Packaging & Containers

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • LU
Market Cap$2.37B
5Y Perf.-60.7%
SON
Sonoco Products Company

Packaging & Containers

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • US
Market Cap$5.16B
5Y Perf.+2.4%

AMBP vs SON — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
AMBP logoAMBP
SON logoSON
IndustryPackaging & ContainersPackaging & Containers
Market Cap$2.37B$5.16B
Revenue (TTM)$5.73B$7.49B
Net Income (TTM)$11M$1.04B
Gross Margin10.0%20.9%
Operating Margin4.9%8.7%
Forward P/E16.0x8.9x
Total Debt$4.42B$4.85B
Cash & Equiv.$522M$378M

AMBP vs SONLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

AMBP
SON
StockSep 20May 26Return
Ardagh Metal Packag… (AMBP)10039.3-60.7%
Sonoco Products Com… (SON)100102.4+2.4%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: AMBP vs SON

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: SON leads in 6 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. Ardagh Metal Packaging S.A. is the stronger pick specifically for dividend income and shareholder returns. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
AMBP
Ardagh Metal Packaging S.A.
The Defensive Pick

AMBP is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.

  • Beta 0.81, yield 11.0%, current ratio 1.06x
  • 11.0% yield, vs SON's 4.0%
Best for: defensive
SON
Sonoco Products Company
The Income Pick

SON carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 30 yrs, beta 0.53, yield 4.0%
  • Rev growth 41.7%, EPS growth 141.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 8.7%
  • 50.2% 10Y total return vs AMBP's -44.3%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthSON logoSON41.7% revenue growth vs AMBP's 12.0%
ValueSON logoSONLower P/E (8.9x vs 16.0x)
Quality / MarginsSON logoSON13.8% margin vs AMBP's 0.2%
Stability / SafetySON logoSONBeta 0.53 vs AMBP's 0.81
DividendsAMBP logoAMBP11.0% yield, vs SON's 4.0%
Momentum (1Y)SON logoSON+22.7% vs AMBP's +21.3%
Efficiency (ROA)SON logoSON9.0% ROA vs AMBP's 0.2%, ROIC 6.2% vs 6.5%

AMBP vs SON — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

AMBPArdagh Metal Packaging S.A.

Segment breakdown not available.

SONSonoco Products Company
FY 2025
Consumer Packaging
66.9%$4.9B
Industrial Paper Packaging Segment
33.1%$2.4B

AMBP vs SON — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLSONLAGGINGAMBP

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — AMBP and SON each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

SON and AMBP operate at a comparable scale, with $7.5B and $5.7B in trailing revenue. SON is the more profitable business, keeping 13.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AMBP's 0.2%. On growth, AMBP holds the edge at +18.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricAMBP logoAMBPArdagh Metal Pack…SON logoSONSonoco Products C…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$5.7B$7.5B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$753M$1.2B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$11M$1.0B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$209M$266M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+10.0%+20.9%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+4.9%+8.7%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+0.2%+13.8%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+3.6%+3.6%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+18.6%-1.9%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+58.0%+23.6%
Evenly matched — AMBP and SON each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

AMBP leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

On an enterprise value basis, SON's 7.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than AMBP's 8.5x.

MetricAMBP logoAMBPArdagh Metal Pack…SON logoSONSonoco Products C…
Market CapShares × price$2.4B$5.2B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$6.3B$9.6B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-215.76x13.14x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.16.03x8.94x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.93x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple8.48x7.82x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.43x0.69x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.43x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF8.95x13.14x
AMBP leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

SON leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SON scores 7/9 vs AMBP's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricAMBP logoAMBPArdagh Metal Pack…SON logoSONSonoco Products C…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+30.0%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+0.2%+9.0%
ROICReturn on invested capital+6.5%+6.2%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+6.9%+8.3%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–967
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage1.34x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$3.9B$4.5B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$522M$378M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$4.4B$4.9B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense1.08x4.60x
SON leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

SON leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in SON five years ago would be worth $8,993 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,413 for AMBP. Over the past 12 months, SON leads with a +22.7% total return vs AMBP's +21.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AMBP at 10.5% vs SON's -0.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricAMBP logoAMBPArdagh Metal Pack…SON logoSONSonoco Products C…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-1.9%+19.1%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+21.3%+22.7%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+35.0%-2.2%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-45.9%-10.1%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-44.3%+50.2%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+10.5%-0.7%
SON leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

SON leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

SON is the less volatile stock with a 0.53 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AMBP's 0.81 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SON currently trades 89.5% from its 52-week high vs AMBP's 78.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricAMBP logoAMBPArdagh Metal Pack…SON logoSONSonoco Products C…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.81x0.53x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$5.03$58.43
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$3.29$38.65
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+78.9%+89.5%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10043.944.0
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded1.5M1.1M
SON leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — AMBP and SON each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Wall Street rates AMBP as "Hold" and SON as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 13.9% upside for AMBP (target: $5) vs 12.8% for SON (target: $59). For income investors, AMBP offers the higher dividend yield at 11.04% vs SON's 4.00%.

MetricAMBP logoAMBPArdagh Metal Pack…SON logoSONSonoco Products C…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$4.52$59.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts621
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+11.0%+4.0%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises030
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.44$2.09
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+0.2%
Evenly matched — AMBP and SON each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

SON leads in 3 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). AMBP leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.

Best OverallSonoco Products Company (SON)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

AMBP vs SON: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is AMBP or SON a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Sonoco Products Company (SON) is the stronger pick with 41.

7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 12. 0% for Ardagh Metal Packaging S. A. (AMBP). Sonoco Products Company (SON) offers the better valuation at 13. 1x trailing P/E (8. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Sonoco Products Company (SON) a "Buy" — based on 21 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — AMBP or SON?

On forward P/E, Sonoco Products Company is actually cheaper at 8.

9x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — AMBP or SON?

Over the past 5 years, Sonoco Products Company (SON) delivered a total return of -10.

1%, compared to -45. 9% for Ardagh Metal Packaging S. A. (AMBP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SON returned +50. 2% versus AMBP's -44. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — AMBP or SON?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Sonoco Products Company (SON) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

53β versus Ardagh Metal Packaging S. A. 's 0. 81β — meaning AMBP is approximately 53% more volatile than SON relative to the S&P 500.

05

Which is growing faster — AMBP or SON?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Sonoco Products Company (SON) is pulling ahead at 41.

7% versus 12. 0% for Ardagh Metal Packaging S. A. (AMBP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Sonoco Products Company grew EPS 141. 2% year-over-year, compared to 59. 3% for Ardagh Metal Packaging S. A.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SON leads at 8. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — AMBP or SON?

Sonoco Products Company (SON) is the more profitable company, earning 5.

3% net margin versus 0. 2% for Ardagh Metal Packaging S. A. — meaning it keeps 5. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SON leads at 9. 5% versus 5. 0% for AMBP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SON leads at 20. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is AMBP or SON more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Sonoco Products Company (SON) trades at 8.

9x forward P/E versus 16. 0x for Ardagh Metal Packaging S. A. — 7. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AMBP: 13. 9% to $4. 52.

08

Which pays a better dividend — AMBP or SON?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Ardagh Metal Packaging S. A. (AMBP) offers the highest yield at 11. 0%, versus 4. 0% for Sonoco Products Company (SON).

09

Is AMBP or SON better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Sonoco Products Company (SON) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

53), 4. 0% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SON: +50. 2%, AMBP: -44. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between AMBP and SON?

Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: AMBP is a small-cap income-oriented stock; SON is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

AMBP

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 9%
  • Dividend Yield > 4.4%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SON

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 8%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.5%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform AMBP and SON on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(AMBP: 18.6% · SON: -1.9%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.