Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

AME vs PNR vs DHR vs ROP vs A

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
AME
AMETEK, Inc.

Industrial - Machinery

IndustrialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$53.72B
5Y Perf.+155.7%
PNR
Pentair plc

Industrial - Machinery

IndustrialsNYSE • GB
Market Cap$12.76B
5Y Perf.+101.8%
DHR
Danaher Corporation

Medical - Diagnostics & Research

HealthcareNYSE • US
Market Cap$124.33B
5Y Perf.+18.9%
ROP
Roper Technologies, Inc.

Industrial - Machinery

IndustrialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$36.28B
5Y Perf.-10.5%
A
Agilent Technologies, Inc.

Medical - Diagnostics & Research

HealthcareNYSE • US
Market Cap$33.58B
5Y Perf.+34.6%

AME vs PNR vs DHR vs ROP vs A — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
AME logoAME
PNR logoPNR
DHR logoDHR
ROP logoROP
A logoA
IndustryIndustrial - MachineryIndustrial - MachineryMedical - Diagnostics & ResearchIndustrial - MachineryMedical - Diagnostics & Research
Market Cap$53.72B$12.76B$124.33B$36.28B$33.58B
Revenue (TTM)$7.60B$4.20B$24.78B$8.12B$7.07B
Net Income (TTM)$1.53B$671M$3.69B$1.71B$1.29B
Gross Margin36.6%40.9%60.7%69.4%38.8%
Operating Margin26.2%20.6%21.0%28.1%20.6%
Forward P/E29.1x14.8x20.8x16.1x19.9x
Total Debt$2.28B$1.64B$18.42B$9.30B$3.35B
Cash & Equiv.$458M$102M$4.62B$297M$1.79B

AME vs PNR vs DHR vs ROP vs ALong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

AME
PNR
DHR
ROP
A
StockMay 20May 26Return
AMETEK, Inc. (AME)100255.7+155.7%
Pentair plc (PNR)100201.8+101.8%
Danaher Corporation (DHR)100118.9+18.9%
Roper Technologies,… (ROP)10089.5-10.5%
Agilent Technologie… (A)100134.6+34.6%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: AME vs PNR vs DHR vs ROP vs A

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: ROP leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. AMETEK, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for dividend income and shareholder returns and recent price momentum and sentiment. PNR and A also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
AME
AMETEK, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

AME is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.

  • 423.4% 10Y total return vs A's 205.7%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.93, Low D/E 21.5%, current ratio 1.06x
  • 0.5% yield, 16-year raise streak, vs PNR's 1.3%
  • +38.9% vs ROP's -38.0%
Best for: long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night
PNR
Pentair plc
The Value Pick

PNR ranks third and is worth considering specifically for valuation efficiency.

  • PEG 1.13 vs DHR's 34.35
  • Lower P/E (14.8x vs 19.9x), PEG 1.13 vs 1.35
Best for: valuation efficiency
DHR
Danaher Corporation
The Quality Angle

Among these 5 stocks, DHR doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: healthcare exposure
ROP
Roper Technologies, Inc.
The Income Pick

ROP carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.43, yield 0.9%
  • Rev growth 12.3%, EPS growth -1.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 13.7%
  • Beta 0.43, yield 0.9%, current ratio 0.52x
  • 12.3% revenue growth vs PNR's 2.3%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
A
Agilent Technologies, Inc.
The Niche Pick

A is the clearest fit if your priority is efficiency.

  • 10.1% ROA vs DHR's 4.5%, ROIC 13.5% vs 5.9%
Best for: efficiency
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthROP logoROP12.3% revenue growth vs PNR's 2.3%
ValuePNR logoPNRLower P/E (14.8x vs 19.9x), PEG 1.13 vs 1.35
Quality / MarginsROP logoROP21.1% margin vs DHR's 14.9%
Stability / SafetyROP logoROPBeta 0.43 vs A's 1.23, lower leverage
DividendsAME logoAME0.5% yield, 16-year raise streak, vs PNR's 1.3%
Momentum (1Y)AME logoAME+38.9% vs ROP's -38.0%
Efficiency (ROA)A logoA10.1% ROA vs DHR's 4.5%, ROIC 13.5% vs 5.9%

AME vs PNR vs DHR vs ROP vs A — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

AMEAMETEK, Inc.
FY 2025
Electronic Instruments Group
66.5%$4.9B
Electromechanical Group
33.5%$2.5B
PNRPentair plc
FY 2025
Pool
37.3%$1.6B
Industrial & Flow Technologies
37.2%$1.6B
Water Unit
25.4%$1.1B
DHRDanaher Corporation
FY 2025
Revenue from Contract with Customer, Measurement, Recurring
81.9%$20.1B
Revenue from Contract with Customer, Measurement, Nonrecurring
18.1%$4.4B
ROPRoper Technologies, Inc.
FY 2025
Software And Related Services
100.0%$12.3B
AAgilent Technologies, Inc.
FY 2025
Agilent CrossLab
41.9%$2.9B
Life Sciences and Applied Markets
39.2%$2.7B
Applied Markets
18.9%$1.3B

AME vs PNR vs DHR vs ROP vs A — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLAMELAGGINGA

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

ROP leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

DHR is the larger business by revenue, generating $24.8B annually — 5.9x PNR's $4.2B. ROP is the more profitable business, keeping 21.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to DHR's 14.9%. On growth, AME holds the edge at +11.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricAME logoAMEAMETEK, Inc.PNR logoPNRPentair plcDHR logoDHRDanaher Corporati…ROP logoROPRoper Technologie…A logoAAgilent Technolog…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$7.6B$4.2B$24.8B$8.1B$7.1B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$2.3B$983M$7.2B$3.2B$1.7B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$1.5B$671M$3.7B$1.7B$1.3B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$1.7B$716M$5.3B$2.6B$993M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+36.6%+40.9%+60.7%+69.4%+38.8%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+26.2%+20.6%+21.0%+28.1%+20.6%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+20.1%+16.0%+14.9%+21.1%+18.3%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+22.4%+17.0%+21.4%+31.4%+14.1%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+11.3%+2.6%+3.7%+11.3%+7.0%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+14.5%+12.9%+9.8%+59.1%-3.6%
ROP leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

PNR leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 19.9x trailing earnings, PNR trades at a 46% valuation discount to AME's 36.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), PNR offers better value at 1.52x vs DHR's 34.35x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricAME logoAMEAMETEK, Inc.PNR logoPNRPentair plcDHR logoDHRDanaher Corporati…ROP logoROPRoper Technologie…A logoAAgilent Technolog…
Market CapShares × price$53.7B$12.8B$124.3B$36.3B$33.6B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$55.5B$14.3B$138.1B$45.3B$35.1B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS36.64x19.94x34.85x24.82x25.96x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.29.08x14.75x20.82x16.08x19.87x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate3.28x1.52x34.35x2.59x1.76x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple29.55x14.66x18.21x14.57x19.89x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue7.26x3.06x5.06x4.59x4.83x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share5.10x3.38x2.38x1.91x5.00x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF32.14x17.11x23.64x14.55x29.15x
PNR leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

Evenly matched — AME and PNR and A each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.

A delivers a 18.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $19 in annual profit, vs $7 for DHR. AME carries lower financial leverage with a 0.21x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to A's 0.50x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PNR scores 8/9 vs A's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricAME logoAMEAMETEK, Inc.PNR logoPNRPentair plcDHR logoDHRDanaher Corporati…ROP logoROPRoper Technologie…A logoAAgilent Technolog…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+14.4%+17.7%+7.1%+8.8%+18.7%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+9.6%+9.9%+4.5%+5.0%+10.1%
ROICReturn on invested capital+12.1%+12.1%+5.9%+6.1%+13.5%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+15.0%+15.0%+7.0%+7.7%+14.5%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–978765
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.21x0.42x0.35x0.47x0.50x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$1.8B$1.5B$13.8B$9.0B$1.6B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$458M$102M$4.6B$297M$1.8B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$2.3B$1.6B$18.4B$9.3B$3.4B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense23.34x11.94x18.13x6.50x19.53x
Evenly matched — AME and PNR and A each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

AME leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in AME five years ago would be worth $17,454 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,893 for DHR. Over the past 12 months, AME leads with a +38.9% total return vs ROP's -38.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AME at 18.0% vs ROP's -7.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricAME logoAMEAMETEK, Inc.PNR logoPNRPentair plcDHR logoDHRDanaher Corporati…ROP logoROPRoper Technologie…A logoAAgilent Technolog…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+12.3%-24.6%-23.6%-18.5%-13.6%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+38.9%-12.8%-8.3%-38.0%+11.3%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+64.1%+39.8%-15.5%-21.0%-8.2%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+74.5%+23.0%-21.1%-17.5%-8.0%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+423.4%+126.9%+219.3%+115.0%+205.7%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+18.0%+11.8%-5.5%-7.6%-2.8%
AME leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — AME and ROP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

ROP is the less volatile stock with a 0.43 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than A's 1.23 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AME currently trades 96.4% from its 52-week high vs ROP's 60.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricAME logoAMEAMETEK, Inc.PNR logoPNRPentair plcDHR logoDHRDanaher Corporati…ROP logoROPRoper Technologie…A logoAAgilent Technolog…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.93x1.22x0.94x0.43x1.23x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$243.18$113.95$242.80$584.03$160.27
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$168.49$77.02$172.06$313.86$104.79
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+96.4%+69.3%+72.3%+60.3%+74.0%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10063.335.333.043.652.5
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded1.2M1.6M4.2M1.2M2.0M
Evenly matched — AME and ROP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — AME and PNR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: AME as "Buy", PNR as "Hold", DHR as "Buy", ROP as "Buy", A as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 43.8% upside for PNR (target: $114) vs 4.9% for AME (target: $246). For income investors, PNR offers the higher dividend yield at 1.26% vs AME's 0.53%.

MetricAME logoAMEAMETEK, Inc.PNR logoPNRPentair plcDHR logoDHRDanaher Corporati…ROP logoROPRoper Technologie…A logoAAgilent Technolog…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyHoldBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$245.91$113.56$247.00$457.64$166.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts2941422338
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.5%+1.3%+0.7%+0.9%+0.8%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises16611210
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1.23$0.99$1.23$3.29$0.99
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+0.8%+1.8%+2.5%+1.4%+1.3%
Evenly matched — AME and PNR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

ROP leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). PNR leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.

Best OverallAMETEK, Inc. (AME)Leads 1 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

AME vs PNR vs DHR vs ROP vs A: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is AME or PNR or DHR or ROP or A a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Roper Technologies, Inc.

(ROP) is the stronger pick with 12. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 3% for Pentair plc (PNR). Pentair plc (PNR) offers the better valuation at 19. 9x trailing P/E (14. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate AMETEK, Inc. (AME) a "Buy" — based on 29 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — AME or PNR or DHR or ROP or A?

On trailing P/E, Pentair plc (PNR) is the cheapest at 19.

9x versus AMETEK, Inc. at 36. 6x. On forward P/E, Pentair plc is actually cheaper at 14. 8x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Pentair plc wins at 1. 13x versus Danaher Corporation's 34. 35x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — AME or PNR or DHR or ROP or A?

Over the past 5 years, AMETEK, Inc.

(AME) delivered a total return of +74. 5%, compared to -21. 1% for Danaher Corporation (DHR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AME returned +423. 4% versus ROP's +115. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — AME or PNR or DHR or ROP or A?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Roper Technologies, Inc.

(ROP) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 43β versus Agilent Technologies, Inc. 's 1. 23β — meaning A is approximately 188% more volatile than ROP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, AMETEK, Inc. (AME) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 21% versus 50% for Agilent Technologies, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — AME or PNR or DHR or ROP or A?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Roper Technologies, Inc.

(ROP) is pulling ahead at 12. 3% versus 2. 3% for Pentair plc (PNR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: AMETEK, Inc. grew EPS 7. 9% year-over-year, compared to -4. 7% for Danaher Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, ROP leads at 13. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — AME or PNR or DHR or ROP or A?

AMETEK, Inc.

(AME) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 0% net margin versus 14. 7% for Danaher Corporation — meaning it keeps 20. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ROP leads at 28. 3% versus 20. 5% for PNR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ROP leads at 69. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is AME or PNR or DHR or ROP or A more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Pentair plc (PNR) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 13x versus Danaher Corporation's 34. 35x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Pentair plc (PNR) trades at 14. 8x forward P/E versus 29. 1x for AMETEK, Inc. — 14. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PNR: 43. 8% to $113. 56.

08

Which pays a better dividend — AME or PNR or DHR or ROP or A?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Pentair plc (PNR) offers the highest yield at 1. 3%, versus 0. 5% for AMETEK, Inc. (AME).

09

Is AME or PNR or DHR or ROP or A better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Roper Technologies, Inc.

(ROP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 43), 0. 9% yield, +115. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ROP: +115. 0%, PNR: +126. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between AME and PNR and DHR and ROP and A?

These companies operate in different sectors (AME (Industrials) and PNR (Industrials) and DHR (Healthcare) and ROP (Industrials) and A (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

AME

Quality Mega-Cap Compounder

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 12%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

PNR

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 9%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

DHR

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 8%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ROP

Quality Mega-Cap Compounder

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 12%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

A

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 10%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform AME and PNR and DHR and ROP and A on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(AME: 11.3% · PNR: 2.6%)
Net Margin>
%
(AME: 20.1% · PNR: 16.0%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(AME: 36.6x · PNR: 19.9x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.