AMKR vs UTSI

For growth investors, Amkor Technology, Inc.

(AMKR) is the stronger pick with 6. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -30. 9% for UTStarcom Holdings Corp. (UTSI). Amkor Technology, Inc. (AMKR) offers the better valuation at 51. 1x trailing P/E (36. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Amkor Technology, Inc. (AMKR) a "Hold" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

Over the past 5 years, Amkor Technology, Inc.

(AMKR) delivered a total return of +296. 1%, compared to -53. 7% for UTStarcom Holdings Corp. (UTSI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AMKR returned +1308% versus UTSI's -70. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), UTStarcom Holdings Corp.

(UTSI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 20β versus Amkor Technology, Inc. 's 2. 87β — meaning AMKR is approximately 1367% more volatile than UTSI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, UTStarcom Holdings Corp. (UTSI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 35% for Amkor Technology, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Amkor Technology, Inc.

(AMKR) is pulling ahead at 6. 2% versus -30. 9% for UTStarcom Holdings Corp. (UTSI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Amkor Technology, Inc. grew EPS 4. 9% year-over-year, compared to -14. 3% for UTStarcom Holdings Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, AMKR leads at -1. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Amkor Technology, Inc.

(AMKR) is the more profitable company, earning 5. 6% net margin versus -40. 2% for UTStarcom Holdings Corp. — meaning it keeps 5. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AMKR leads at 7. 0% versus -67. 4% for UTSI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — UTSI leads at 26. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

In this comparison, AMKR (0.

4% yield) pays a dividend. UTSI does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, UTStarcom Holdings Corp.

(UTSI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 20)). Amkor Technology, Inc. (AMKR) carries a higher beta of 2. 87 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (UTSI: -70. 8%, AMKR: +1308%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.