Medical - Care Facilities
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
AMN vs CHE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Care Facilities
AMN vs CHE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Care Facilities | Medical - Care Facilities |
| Market Cap | $811M | $5.81B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.73B | $2.54B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-96M | $260M |
| Gross Margin | 25.7% | 22.5% |
| Operating Margin | -3.5% | 12.9% |
| Forward P/E | 10.3x | 17.4x |
| Total Debt | $803M | $155M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $34M | $75M |
AMN vs CHE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMN Healthcare Serv… (AMN) | 100 | 47.3 | -52.7% |
| Chemed Corporation (CHE) | 100 | 88.7 | -11.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AMN vs CHE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AMN is the clearest fit if your priority is value and momentum.
- Lower P/E (10.3x vs 17.4x)
- +7.1% vs CHE's -26.0%
CHE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 18 yrs, beta 0.33, yield 0.5%
- Rev growth 4.1%, EPS growth -7.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.8%
- 239.1% 10Y total return vs AMN's -44.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 4.1% revenue growth vs AMN's -8.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.3x vs 17.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 10.2% margin vs AMN's -3.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.33 vs AMN's 1.08, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.5% yield; 18-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +7.1% vs CHE's -26.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 15.9% ROA vs AMN's -4.3%, ROIC 23.7% vs 1.6% |
AMN vs CHE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
AMN vs CHE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — AMN and CHE each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMN and CHE operate at a comparable scale, with $2.7B and $2.5B in trailing revenue. CHE is the more profitable business, keeping 10.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AMN's -3.5%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.7B | $2.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $62M | $377M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$96M | $260M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $234M | $377M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +25.7% | +22.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -3.5% | +12.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -3.5% | +10.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +8.6% | +14.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +1.8% | +1.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +95.9% | -0.2% |
Valuation Metrics
AMN leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, AMN's 8.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CHE's 14.6x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $811M | $5.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.6B | $5.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -8.46x | 23.05x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.31x | 17.43x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.33x | 14.60x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.30x | 2.29x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.26x | 6.24x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 3.47x | 17.84x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CHE leads this category, winning 8 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CHE delivers a 25.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $25 in annual profit, vs $-15 for AMN. CHE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.16x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AMN's 1.25x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -14.7% | +25.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -4.3% | +15.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +1.6% | +23.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.0% | +24.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.25x | 0.16x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $769M | $80M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $34M | $75M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $803M | $155M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1.22x | 107.24x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CHE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CHE five years ago would be worth $8,964 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,366 for AMN. Over the past 12 months, AMN leads with a +7.1% total return vs CHE's -26.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CHE at -8.0% vs AMN's -38.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +38.7% | +0.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +7.1% | -26.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -76.8% | -22.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -76.3% | -10.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -44.1% | +239.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -38.5% | -8.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — AMN and CHE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CHE is the less volatile stock with a 0.33 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AMN's 1.08 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AMN currently trades 88.4% from its 52-week high vs CHE's 72.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.08x | 0.33x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $23.74 | $583.96 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $14.87 | $365.20 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +88.4% | +72.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 60.3 | 67.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 839K | 275K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates AMN as "Buy" and CHE as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 11.9% upside for CHE (target: $475) vs 7.3% for AMN (target: $23). CHE is the only dividend payer here at 0.52% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $22.50 | $475.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 17 | 9 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 18 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $2.20 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.3% | +7.4% |
CHE leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). AMN leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
AMN vs CHE: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AMN or CHE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Chemed Corporation (CHE) is the stronger pick with 4.
1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -8. 5% for AMN Healthcare Services, Inc. (AMN). Chemed Corporation (CHE) offers the better valuation at 23. 0x trailing P/E (17. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate AMN Healthcare Services, Inc. (AMN) a "Buy" — based on 17 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AMN or CHE?
On forward P/E, AMN Healthcare Services, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 10. 3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AMN or CHE?
Over the past 5 years, Chemed Corporation (CHE) delivered a total return of -10.
4%, compared to -76. 3% for AMN Healthcare Services, Inc. (AMN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CHE returned +239. 1% versus AMN's -44. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AMN or CHE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Chemed Corporation (CHE) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
33β versus AMN Healthcare Services, Inc. 's 1. 08β — meaning AMN is approximately 231% more volatile than CHE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Chemed Corporation (CHE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 16% versus 125% for AMN Healthcare Services, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AMN or CHE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Chemed Corporation (CHE) is pulling ahead at 4.
1% versus -8. 5% for AMN Healthcare Services, Inc. (AMN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: AMN Healthcare Services, Inc. grew EPS 35. 6% year-over-year, compared to -7. 4% for Chemed Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, CHE leads at 5. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AMN or CHE?
Chemed Corporation (CHE) is the more profitable company, earning 10.
5% net margin versus -3. 5% for AMN Healthcare Services, Inc. — meaning it keeps 10. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CHE leads at 13. 4% versus 1. 2% for AMN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CHE leads at 30. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AMN or CHE more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, AMN Healthcare Services, Inc.
(AMN) trades at 10. 3x forward P/E versus 17. 4x for Chemed Corporation — 7. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CHE: 11. 9% to $475. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — AMN or CHE?
In this comparison, CHE (0.
5% yield) pays a dividend. AMN does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is AMN or CHE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Chemed Corporation (CHE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
33), 0. 5% yield, +239. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CHE: +239. 1%, AMN: -44. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AMN and CHE?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
CHE pays a dividend while AMN does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.