Medical - Care Facilities
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
AMN vs CHE vs CCRN vs TBI vs HCSG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Care Facilities
Medical - Care Facilities
Staffing & Employment Services
Medical - Care Facilities
AMN vs CHE vs CCRN vs TBI vs HCSG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Care Facilities | Medical - Care Facilities | Medical - Care Facilities | Staffing & Employment Services | Medical - Care Facilities |
| Market Cap | $869M | $5.82B | $423M | $182M | $1.60B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.42B | $2.54B | $761M | $1.25B | $1.84B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-32M | $260M | $-99M | $-53M | $59M |
| Gross Margin | 25.5% | 22.5% | 18.2% | 28.4% | 13.3% |
| Operating Margin | 0.3% | 12.9% | -0.9% | -2.6% | 3.0% |
| Forward P/E | 11.0x | 17.5x | 133.8x | — | 20.8x |
| Total Debt | $803M | $155M | $2M | $171M | $25M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $34M | $75M | $109M | $25M | $161M |
AMN vs CHE vs CCRN vs TBI vs HCSG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMN Healthcare Serv… (AMN) | 100 | 50.7 | -49.3% |
| Chemed Corporation (CHE) | 100 | 89.0 | -11.0% |
| Cross Country Healt… (CCRN) | 100 | 215.7 | +115.7% |
| TrueBlue, Inc. (TBI) | 100 | 38.9 | -61.1% |
| Healthcare Services… (HCSG) | 100 | 93.3 | -6.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AMN vs CHE vs CCRN vs TBI vs HCSG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AMN ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value.
- Lower P/E (11.0x vs 20.8x)
CHE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 18 yrs, beta 0.33, yield 0.5%
- 241.8% 10Y total return vs CCRN's -10.5%
- 10.2% margin vs CCRN's -13.0%
- Beta 0.33 vs TBI's 1.13, lower leverage
CCRN is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.78, Low D/E 0.7%, current ratio 3.78x
- Beta 0.78, current ratio 3.78x
Among these 5 stocks, TBI doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
HCSG is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 7.1%, EPS growth 52.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 2.8%
- 7.1% revenue growth vs CCRN's -21.6%
- +55.8% vs CHE's -25.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 7.1% revenue growth vs CCRN's -21.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.0x vs 20.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 10.2% margin vs CCRN's -13.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.33 vs TBI's 1.13, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.5% yield; 18-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +55.8% vs CHE's -25.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 15.9% ROA vs CCRN's -19.8%, ROIC 23.7% vs -0.9% |
AMN vs CHE vs CCRN vs TBI vs HCSG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
AMN vs CHE vs CCRN vs TBI vs HCSG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
AMN leads in 2 of 6 categories
HCSG leads 2 • CHE leads 1 • CCRN leads 0 • TBI leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMN is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.4B annually — 4.5x CCRN's $761M. CHE is the more profitable business, keeping 10.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CCRN's -13.0%. On growth, AMN holds the edge at +99.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3.4B | $2.5B | $761M | $1.2B | $1.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $127M | $377M | $9M | -$10M | $72M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$32M | $260M | -$99M | -$53M | $59M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $714M | $377M | $41M | -$60M | $139M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +25.5% | +22.5% | +18.2% | +28.4% | +13.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +0.3% | +12.9% | -0.9% | -2.6% | +3.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -0.9% | +10.2% | -13.0% | -4.3% | +3.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +20.9% | +14.8% | +5.4% | -4.8% | +7.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +99.9% | +1.6% | -100.0% | -100.0% | +6.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +56.8% | -0.2% | -6.0% | -37.5% | +175.0% |
Valuation Metrics
AMN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 23.1x trailing earnings, CHE trades at a 16% valuation discount to HCSG's 27.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, AMN's 8.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than TBI's 160.0x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $869M | $5.8B | $423M | $182M | $1.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.6B | $5.9B | $317M | $329M | $1.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -9.06x | 23.12x | -4.47x | -3.73x | 27.54x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 11.05x | 17.49x | 133.84x | — | 20.83x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.63x | 14.65x | 23.75x | 160.03x | 22.38x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.32x | 2.30x | 0.40x | 0.11x | 0.87x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.35x | 6.26x | 1.31x | 0.65x | 3.19x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 3.72x | 17.89x | 10.55x | — | 11.49x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CHE leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CHE delivers a 25.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $25 in annual profit, vs $-27 for CCRN. CCRN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AMN's 1.25x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HCSG scores 7/9 vs TBI's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -5.0% | +25.3% | -27.1% | -18.7% | +11.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -1.4% | +15.9% | -19.8% | -8.1% | +7.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +1.6% | +23.7% | -0.9% | -5.2% | +9.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.0% | +24.7% | -0.8% | -5.3% | +7.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 4 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.25x | 0.16x | 0.01x | 0.62x | 0.05x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $769M | $80M | -$106M | $146M | -$136M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $34M | $75M | $109M | $25M | $161M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $803M | $155M | $2M | $171M | $25M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1.70x | 107.24x | -1.39x | -46.19x | 33.02x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HCSG leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CHE five years ago would be worth $8,883 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,130 for TBI. Over the past 12 months, HCSG leads with a +55.8% total return vs CHE's -25.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HCSG at 14.1% vs AMN's -37.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +48.7% | +0.6% | +62.4% | +36.6% | +28.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +14.6% | -25.9% | -5.4% | +51.0% | +55.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -75.1% | -21.9% | -44.3% | -60.2% | +48.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -75.1% | -11.2% | -22.5% | -78.7% | -21.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -41.5% | +241.8% | -10.5% | -68.4% | -26.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -37.1% | -7.9% | -17.7% | -26.4% | +14.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — AMN and CHE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CHE is the less volatile stock with a 0.33 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TBI's 1.13 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AMN currently trades 94.7% from its 52-week high vs CHE's 72.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.08x | 0.33x | 0.78x | 1.13x | 1.12x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $23.74 | $583.96 | $14.99 | $7.78 | $24.39 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $14.87 | $365.20 | $7.43 | $3.18 | $12.66 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +94.7% | +72.9% | +87.3% | +77.2% | +91.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 57.2 | 64.7 | 53.1 | 83.2 | 61.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 849K | 274K | 552K | 386K | 676K |
Analyst Outlook
HCSG leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: AMN as "Buy", CHE as "Hold", CCRN as "Hold", TBI as "Buy", HCSG as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 11.5% upside for CHE (target: $475) vs -18.9% for CCRN (target: $11). CHE is the only dividend payer here at 0.52% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Hold | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $22.50 | $475.00 | $10.61 | $5.75 | $24.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 17 | 9 | 14 | 10 | 15 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.5% | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 18 | 1 | 0 | 20 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $2.20 | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.2% | +7.4% | +1.6% | +0.6% | +3.9% |
AMN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). HCSG leads in 2 (Total Returns, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
AMN vs CHE vs CCRN vs TBI vs HCSG: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AMN or CHE or CCRN or TBI or HCSG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Healthcare Services Group, Inc.
(HCSG) is the stronger pick with 7. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -21. 6% for Cross Country Healthcare, Inc. (CCRN). Chemed Corporation (CHE) offers the better valuation at 23. 1x trailing P/E (17. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate AMN Healthcare Services, Inc. (AMN) a "Buy" — based on 17 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AMN or CHE or CCRN or TBI or HCSG?
On trailing P/E, Chemed Corporation (CHE) is the cheapest at 23.
1x versus Healthcare Services Group, Inc. at 27. 5x. On forward P/E, AMN Healthcare Services, Inc. is actually cheaper at 11. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AMN or CHE or CCRN or TBI or HCSG?
Over the past 5 years, Chemed Corporation (CHE) delivered a total return of -11.
2%, compared to -78. 7% for TrueBlue, Inc. (TBI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CHE returned +241. 8% versus TBI's -68. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AMN or CHE or CCRN or TBI or HCSG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Chemed Corporation (CHE) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
33β versus TrueBlue, Inc. 's 1. 13β — meaning TBI is approximately 246% more volatile than CHE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Cross Country Healthcare, Inc. (CCRN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 125% for AMN Healthcare Services, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AMN or CHE or CCRN or TBI or HCSG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Healthcare Services Group, Inc.
(HCSG) is pulling ahead at 7. 1% versus -21. 6% for Cross Country Healthcare, Inc. (CCRN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: TrueBlue, Inc. grew EPS 61. 4% year-over-year, compared to -565. 9% for Cross Country Healthcare, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CHE leads at 5. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AMN or CHE or CCRN or TBI or HCSG?
Chemed Corporation (CHE) is the more profitable company, earning 10.
5% net margin versus -9. 0% for Cross Country Healthcare, Inc. — meaning it keeps 10. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CHE leads at 13. 4% versus -1. 7% for TBI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CHE leads at 30. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AMN or CHE or CCRN or TBI or HCSG more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, AMN Healthcare Services, Inc.
(AMN) trades at 11. 0x forward P/E versus 133. 8x for Cross Country Healthcare, Inc. — 122. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CHE: 11. 5% to $475. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — AMN or CHE or CCRN or TBI or HCSG?
In this comparison, CHE (0.
5% yield) pays a dividend. AMN, CCRN, TBI, HCSG do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is AMN or CHE or CCRN or TBI or HCSG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Chemed Corporation (CHE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
33), 0. 5% yield, +241. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CHE: +241. 8%, TBI: -68. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AMN and CHE and CCRN and TBI and HCSG?
These companies operate in different sectors (AMN (Healthcare) and CHE (Healthcare) and CCRN (Healthcare) and TBI (Industrials) and HCSG (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
CHE pays a dividend while AMN, CCRN, TBI, HCSG do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.