Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

AMN vs CHE vs CCRN vs TBI vs HCSG

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
AMN
AMN Healthcare Services, Inc.

Medical - Care Facilities

HealthcareNYSE • US
Market Cap$869M
5Y Perf.-49.3%
CHE
Chemed Corporation

Medical - Care Facilities

HealthcareNYSE • US
Market Cap$5.82B
5Y Perf.-11.0%
CCRN
Cross Country Healthcare, Inc.

Medical - Care Facilities

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$423M
5Y Perf.+115.7%
TBI
TrueBlue, Inc.

Staffing & Employment Services

IndustrialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$182M
5Y Perf.-61.1%
HCSG
Healthcare Services Group, Inc.

Medical - Care Facilities

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.60B
5Y Perf.-6.7%

AMN vs CHE vs CCRN vs TBI vs HCSG — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
AMN logoAMN
CHE logoCHE
CCRN logoCCRN
TBI logoTBI
HCSG logoHCSG
IndustryMedical - Care FacilitiesMedical - Care FacilitiesMedical - Care FacilitiesStaffing & Employment ServicesMedical - Care Facilities
Market Cap$869M$5.82B$423M$182M$1.60B
Revenue (TTM)$3.42B$2.54B$761M$1.25B$1.84B
Net Income (TTM)$-32M$260M$-99M$-53M$59M
Gross Margin25.5%22.5%18.2%28.4%13.3%
Operating Margin0.3%12.9%-0.9%-2.6%3.0%
Forward P/E11.0x17.5x133.8x20.8x
Total Debt$803M$155M$2M$171M$25M
Cash & Equiv.$34M$75M$109M$25M$161M

AMN vs CHE vs CCRN vs TBI vs HCSGLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

AMN
CHE
CCRN
TBI
HCSG
StockMay 20May 26Return
AMN Healthcare Serv… (AMN)10050.7-49.3%
Chemed Corporation (CHE)10089.0-11.0%
Cross Country Healt… (CCRN)100215.7+115.7%
TrueBlue, Inc. (TBI)10038.9-61.1%
Healthcare Services… (HCSG)10093.3-6.7%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: AMN vs CHE vs CCRN vs TBI vs HCSG

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: CHE leads in 4 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. Healthcare Services Group, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and recent price momentum and sentiment. AMN also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
AMN
AMN Healthcare Services, Inc.
The Value Play

AMN ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value.

  • Lower P/E (11.0x vs 20.8x)
Best for: value
CHE
Chemed Corporation
The Income Pick

CHE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.

  • Dividend streak 18 yrs, beta 0.33, yield 0.5%
  • 241.8% 10Y total return vs CCRN's -10.5%
  • 10.2% margin vs CCRN's -13.0%
  • Beta 0.33 vs TBI's 1.13, lower leverage
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
CCRN
Cross Country Healthcare, Inc.
The Defensive Pick

CCRN is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.78, Low D/E 0.7%, current ratio 3.78x
  • Beta 0.78, current ratio 3.78x
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
TBI
TrueBlue, Inc.
The Industrials Pick

Among these 5 stocks, TBI doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: industrials exposure
HCSG
Healthcare Services Group, Inc.
The Growth Play

HCSG is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.

  • Rev growth 7.1%, EPS growth 52.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 2.8%
  • 7.1% revenue growth vs CCRN's -21.6%
  • +55.8% vs CHE's -25.9%
Best for: growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthHCSG logoHCSG7.1% revenue growth vs CCRN's -21.6%
ValueAMN logoAMNLower P/E (11.0x vs 20.8x)
Quality / MarginsCHE logoCHE10.2% margin vs CCRN's -13.0%
Stability / SafetyCHE logoCHEBeta 0.33 vs TBI's 1.13, lower leverage
DividendsCHE logoCHE0.5% yield; 18-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)HCSG logoHCSG+55.8% vs CHE's -25.9%
Efficiency (ROA)CHE logoCHE15.9% ROA vs CCRN's -19.8%, ROIC 23.7% vs -0.9%

AMN vs CHE vs CCRN vs TBI vs HCSG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

AMNAMN Healthcare Services, Inc.
FY 2025
Locum Tenens Staffing
92.4%$565M
Permanent Placement
7.6%$47M
CHEChemed Corporation
FY 2025
Segment Vitas
64.3%$1.7B
Segment Roto Rooter
35.7%$938M
CCRNCross Country Healthcare, Inc.
FY 2025
Other Services
100.0%$30M
TBITrueBlue, Inc.
FY 2025
PeopleReady
54.7%$884M
PeopleManagement
33.7%$544M
PeopleScout
11.6%$188M
HCSGHealthcare Services Group, Inc.
FY 2025
Dietary Services
55.1%$1.0B
Environmental Services
44.9%$825M

AMN vs CHE vs CCRN vs TBI vs HCSG — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLAMNLAGGINGTBI

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

AMN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

AMN is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.4B annually — 4.5x CCRN's $761M. CHE is the more profitable business, keeping 10.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CCRN's -13.0%. On growth, AMN holds the edge at +99.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricAMN logoAMNAMN Healthcare Se…CHE logoCHEChemed CorporationCCRN logoCCRNCross Country Hea…TBI logoTBITrueBlue, Inc.HCSG logoHCSGHealthcare Servic…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$3.4B$2.5B$761M$1.2B$1.8B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$127M$377M$9M-$10M$72M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$32M$260M-$99M-$53M$59M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$714M$377M$41M-$60M$139M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+25.5%+22.5%+18.2%+28.4%+13.3%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+0.3%+12.9%-0.9%-2.6%+3.0%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-0.9%+10.2%-13.0%-4.3%+3.2%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+20.9%+14.8%+5.4%-4.8%+7.6%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+99.9%+1.6%-100.0%-100.0%+6.6%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+56.8%-0.2%-6.0%-37.5%+175.0%
AMN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

AMN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 23.1x trailing earnings, CHE trades at a 16% valuation discount to HCSG's 27.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, AMN's 8.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than TBI's 160.0x.

MetricAMN logoAMNAMN Healthcare Se…CHE logoCHEChemed CorporationCCRN logoCCRNCross Country Hea…TBI logoTBITrueBlue, Inc.HCSG logoHCSGHealthcare Servic…
Market CapShares × price$869M$5.8B$423M$182M$1.6B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$1.6B$5.9B$317M$329M$1.5B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-9.06x23.12x-4.47x-3.73x27.54x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.11.05x17.49x133.84x20.83x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple8.63x14.65x23.75x160.03x22.38x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.32x2.30x0.40x0.11x0.87x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.35x6.26x1.31x0.65x3.19x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF3.72x17.89x10.55x11.49x
AMN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

CHE leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

CHE delivers a 25.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $25 in annual profit, vs $-27 for CCRN. CCRN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AMN's 1.25x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HCSG scores 7/9 vs TBI's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricAMN logoAMNAMN Healthcare Se…CHE logoCHEChemed CorporationCCRN logoCCRNCross Country Hea…TBI logoTBITrueBlue, Inc.HCSG logoHCSGHealthcare Servic…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-5.0%+25.3%-27.1%-18.7%+11.8%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-1.4%+15.9%-19.8%-8.1%+7.3%
ROICReturn on invested capital+1.6%+23.7%-0.9%-5.2%+9.0%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+2.0%+24.7%-0.8%-5.3%+7.7%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–955647
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage1.25x0.16x0.01x0.62x0.05x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$769M$80M-$106M$146M-$136M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$34M$75M$109M$25M$161M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$803M$155M$2M$171M$25M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-1.70x107.24x-1.39x-46.19x33.02x
CHE leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

HCSG leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in CHE five years ago would be worth $8,883 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,130 for TBI. Over the past 12 months, HCSG leads with a +55.8% total return vs CHE's -25.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HCSG at 14.1% vs AMN's -37.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricAMN logoAMNAMN Healthcare Se…CHE logoCHEChemed CorporationCCRN logoCCRNCross Country Hea…TBI logoTBITrueBlue, Inc.HCSG logoHCSGHealthcare Servic…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+48.7%+0.6%+62.4%+36.6%+28.6%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+14.6%-25.9%-5.4%+51.0%+55.8%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-75.1%-21.9%-44.3%-60.2%+48.6%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-75.1%-11.2%-22.5%-78.7%-21.1%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-41.5%+241.8%-10.5%-68.4%-26.8%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-37.1%-7.9%-17.7%-26.4%+14.1%
HCSG leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — AMN and CHE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

CHE is the less volatile stock with a 0.33 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TBI's 1.13 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AMN currently trades 94.7% from its 52-week high vs CHE's 72.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricAMN logoAMNAMN Healthcare Se…CHE logoCHEChemed CorporationCCRN logoCCRNCross Country Hea…TBI logoTBITrueBlue, Inc.HCSG logoHCSGHealthcare Servic…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.08x0.33x0.78x1.13x1.12x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$23.74$583.96$14.99$7.78$24.39
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$14.87$365.20$7.43$3.18$12.66
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+94.7%+72.9%+87.3%+77.2%+91.5%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10057.264.753.183.261.8
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded849K274K552K386K676K
Evenly matched — AMN and CHE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

HCSG leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: AMN as "Buy", CHE as "Hold", CCRN as "Hold", TBI as "Buy", HCSG as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 11.5% upside for CHE (target: $475) vs -18.9% for CCRN (target: $11). CHE is the only dividend payer here at 0.52% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricAMN logoAMNAMN Healthcare Se…CHE logoCHEChemed CorporationCCRN logoCCRNCross Country Hea…TBI logoTBITrueBlue, Inc.HCSG logoHCSGHealthcare Servic…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyHoldHoldBuyHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$22.50$475.00$10.61$5.75$24.50
# AnalystsCovering analysts179141015
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.5%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises181020
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$2.20
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+0.2%+7.4%+1.6%+0.6%+3.9%
HCSG leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

AMN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). HCSG leads in 2 (Total Returns, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.

Best OverallAMN Healthcare Services, In… (AMN)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

AMN vs CHE vs CCRN vs TBI vs HCSG: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is AMN or CHE or CCRN or TBI or HCSG a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Healthcare Services Group, Inc.

(HCSG) is the stronger pick with 7. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -21. 6% for Cross Country Healthcare, Inc. (CCRN). Chemed Corporation (CHE) offers the better valuation at 23. 1x trailing P/E (17. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate AMN Healthcare Services, Inc. (AMN) a "Buy" — based on 17 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — AMN or CHE or CCRN or TBI or HCSG?

On trailing P/E, Chemed Corporation (CHE) is the cheapest at 23.

1x versus Healthcare Services Group, Inc. at 27. 5x. On forward P/E, AMN Healthcare Services, Inc. is actually cheaper at 11. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — AMN or CHE or CCRN or TBI or HCSG?

Over the past 5 years, Chemed Corporation (CHE) delivered a total return of -11.

2%, compared to -78. 7% for TrueBlue, Inc. (TBI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CHE returned +241. 8% versus TBI's -68. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — AMN or CHE or CCRN or TBI or HCSG?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Chemed Corporation (CHE) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

33β versus TrueBlue, Inc. 's 1. 13β — meaning TBI is approximately 246% more volatile than CHE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Cross Country Healthcare, Inc. (CCRN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 125% for AMN Healthcare Services, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — AMN or CHE or CCRN or TBI or HCSG?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Healthcare Services Group, Inc.

(HCSG) is pulling ahead at 7. 1% versus -21. 6% for Cross Country Healthcare, Inc. (CCRN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: TrueBlue, Inc. grew EPS 61. 4% year-over-year, compared to -565. 9% for Cross Country Healthcare, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CHE leads at 5. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — AMN or CHE or CCRN or TBI or HCSG?

Chemed Corporation (CHE) is the more profitable company, earning 10.

5% net margin versus -9. 0% for Cross Country Healthcare, Inc. — meaning it keeps 10. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CHE leads at 13. 4% versus -1. 7% for TBI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CHE leads at 30. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is AMN or CHE or CCRN or TBI or HCSG more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, AMN Healthcare Services, Inc.

(AMN) trades at 11. 0x forward P/E versus 133. 8x for Cross Country Healthcare, Inc. — 122. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CHE: 11. 5% to $475. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — AMN or CHE or CCRN or TBI or HCSG?

In this comparison, CHE (0.

5% yield) pays a dividend. AMN, CCRN, TBI, HCSG do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is AMN or CHE or CCRN or TBI or HCSG better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Chemed Corporation (CHE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

33), 0. 5% yield, +241. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CHE: +241. 8%, TBI: -68. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between AMN and CHE and CCRN and TBI and HCSG?

These companies operate in different sectors (AMN (Healthcare) and CHE (Healthcare) and CCRN (Healthcare) and TBI (Industrials) and HCSG (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

CHE pays a dividend while AMN, CCRN, TBI, HCSG do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

AMN

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 49%
  • Gross Margin > 15%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CHE

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 6%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CCRN

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

TBI

Quality Business

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 17%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

HCSG

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform AMN and CHE and CCRN and TBI and HCSG on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(AMN: 99.9% · CHE: 1.6%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.