Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare Alpha Modus Holdings, Inc. (AMOD) vs ZoomInfo Technologies Inc. (GTM) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Value | AMOD | Lower P/E (0.7x vs 5.6x) |
| Stability / Safety | AMOD | Beta 0.60 vs GTM's 1.81 |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | GTM | -46.7% vs AMOD's -75.4% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | GTM | 1.9% ROA vs AMOD's -18.2% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
Alpha Modus Holdings develops data-driven technologies that enhance in-store digital experiences for consumers at the point of purchase decision. It generates revenue primarily through technology licensing and patent monetization — including its 571-patent portfolio — with additional income from software development services. The company's key advantage lies in its extensive intellectual property portfolio covering retail technology, which creates barriers to entry for competitors.
ZoomInfo is a go-to-market intelligence platform that provides comprehensive data on companies and professionals for sales, marketing, and recruiting teams. It generates revenue primarily through subscription-based access to its cloud platform—with tiered pricing for different organizational sizes—and additional fees for premium data and workflow tools. The company's competitive advantage lies in its massive, continuously updated database of business contacts and buying signals—a network effect that becomes more valuable as more users contribute data.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
GTM leads in 3 of 6 categories (Financial Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). AMOD leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
Financial Metrics (TTM)
GTM and AMOD operate at a comparable scale, with $1.2B and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | AMODAlpha Modus Holdi… | GTMZoomInfo Technolo… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $1.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$4M | $280M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$7M | $124M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$2M | $389M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +84.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +18.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | +9.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +31.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +3.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -176.2% | +175.0% |
Valuation Metrics
At 0.7x trailing earnings, AMOD trades at a 96% valuation discount to GTM's 15.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, AMOD's 6.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than GTM's 11.3x.
| Metric | AMODAlpha Modus Holdi… | GTMZoomInfo Technolo… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $24M | $1.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $28M | $3.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 0.69x | 15.92x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 5.59x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 6.57x | 11.26x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 1.53x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 1.30x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 4.91x |
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GTM scores 7/9 vs AMOD's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | AMODAlpha Modus Holdi… | GTMZoomInfo Technolo… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +8.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -18.2% | +1.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +5.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | +3.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 1.20x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $4M | $75M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $735,814 | $176M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5M | $1.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1.09x | 5.56x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in GTM five years ago would be worth $1,101 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $484 for AMOD. Over the past 12 months, GTM leads with a -46.7% total return vs AMOD's -75.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GTM at -36.4% vs AMOD's -63.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | AMODAlpha Modus Holdi… | GTMZoomInfo Technolo… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +8.5% | -35.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -75.4% | -46.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -95.2% | -74.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -95.2% | -89.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -95.2% | -81.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -63.6% | -36.4% |
Risk & Volatility
AMOD is the less volatile stock with a 0.60 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GTM's 1.81 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GTM currently trades 49.6% from its 52-week high vs AMOD's 19.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | AMODAlpha Modus Holdi… | GTMZoomInfo Technolo… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.60x | 1.81x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.60 | $12.51 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.40 | $5.77 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +19.3% | +49.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 38.6 | 34.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.8M | 6.6M |
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | AMODAlpha Modus Holdi… | GTMZoomInfo Technolo… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $9.29 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 27 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +21.5% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Dec 24 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alpha Modus Holding… (AMOD) | 100 | 8.83 | -91.2% |
| ZoomInfo Technologi… (GTM) | 100 | 74.67 | -25.3% |
ZoomInfo Technologi… (GTM) returned -89% over 5 years vs Alpha Modus Holding… (AMOD)'s -95%.
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2018 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alpha Modus Holding… (AMOD) | $0.00 | $0.00 | — |
| ZoomInfo Technologi… (GTM) | $144M | $1.2B | +765.9% |
ZoomInfo Technologies Inc.'s revenue grew from $144M (2018) to $1.2B (2025) — a 36.1% CAGR.
Chart 3P/E Ratio History — 5 Years
| Stock | 2021 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| ZoomInfo Technologi… (GTM) | 214 | 26.1 | -87.8% |
ZoomInfo Technologies Inc. has traded in a 26x–214x P/E range over 5 years; current trailing P/E is ~16x.
Chart 4EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2018 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alpha Modus Holding… (AMOD) | 0.03 | 0.73 | +2167.1% |
| ZoomInfo Technologi… (GTM) | -0.2 | 0.39 | +295.0% |
ZoomInfo Technologies Inc.'s EPS grew from $-0.20 (2018) to $0.39 (2025).
Chart 5Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
Alpha Modus Holdings, Inc. generated $-2M FCF in 2024 (-36% vs 2021). ZoomInfo Technologies Inc. generated $389M FCF in 2025 (+41% vs 2021).
AMOD vs GTM: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AMOD or GTM a better buy right now?
Alpha Modus Holdings, Inc. (AMOD) offers the better valuation at 0.7x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate ZoomInfo Technologies Inc. (GTM) a "Hold" — based on 27 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AMOD or GTM?
On trailing P/E, Alpha Modus Holdings, Inc. (AMOD) is the cheapest at 0.7x versus ZoomInfo Technologies Inc. at 15.9x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AMOD or GTM?
Over the past 5 years, ZoomInfo Technologies Inc. (GTM) delivered a total return of -89.0%, compared to -95.2% for Alpha Modus Holdings, Inc. (AMOD). A $10,000 investment in GTM five years ago would be worth approximately $1K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GTM returned -81.7% versus AMOD's -95.2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AMOD or GTM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Alpha Modus Holdings, Inc. (AMOD) is the lower-risk stock at 0.60β versus ZoomInfo Technologies Inc.'s 1.81β — meaning GTM is approximately 203% more volatile than AMOD relative to the S&P 500.
05Which has better profit margins — AMOD or GTM?
ZoomInfo Technologies Inc. (GTM) is the more profitable company, earning 9.9% net margin versus 0.0% for Alpha Modus Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 9.9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GTM leads at 18.1% versus 0.0% for AMOD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GTM leads at 82.4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — AMOD or GTM?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend. All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is AMOD or GTM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Alpha Modus Holdings, Inc. (AMOD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.60)). ZoomInfo Technologies Inc. (GTM) carries a higher beta of 1.81 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (AMOD: -95.2%, GTM: -81.7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between AMOD and GTM?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.