Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

AMODW vs PRZO vs RCAT vs AEYE

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
AMODW
Alpha Modus Holdings, Inc.

Software - Application

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$862K
5Y Perf.-68.5%
PRZO
ParaZero Technologies Ltd.

Aerospace & Defense

IndustrialsNASDAQ • IL
Market Cap$8M
5Y Perf.-63.7%
RCAT
Red Cat Holdings, Inc.

Computer Hardware

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.02B
5Y Perf.-8.8%
AEYE
AudioEye, Inc.

Software - Application

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$100M
5Y Perf.-52.9%

AMODW vs PRZO vs RCAT vs AEYE — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
AMODW logoAMODW
PRZO logoPRZO
RCAT logoRCAT
AEYE logoAEYE
IndustrySoftware - ApplicationAerospace & DefenseComputer HardwareSoftware - Application
Market Cap$862K$8M$1.02B$100M
Revenue (TTM)$0.00$858K$26M$40M
Net Income (TTM)$-8M$-9M$-59M$-3M
Gross Margin-9.9%7.9%78.3%
Operating Margin-7.3%-234.6%-7.9%
Forward P/E0.2x94.3x
Total Debt$4M$419K$18M$721K
Cash & Equiv.$736K$4M$168M$5M

AMODW vs PRZO vs RCAT vs AEYELong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

AMODW
PRZO
RCAT
AEYE
StockDec 24May 26Return
Alpha Modus Holding… (AMODW)10031.5-68.5%
ParaZero Technologi… (PRZO)10036.3-63.7%
Red Cat Holdings, I… (RCAT)10091.2-8.8%
AudioEye, Inc. (AEYE)10047.1-52.9%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: AMODW vs PRZO vs RCAT vs AEYE

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: RCAT and AEYE are tied at the top with 2 categories each — the right choice depends on your priorities. AudioEye, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and operational efficiency and capital deployment. AMODW and PRZO also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
AMODW
Alpha Modus Holdings, Inc.
The Value Play

AMODW is the clearest fit if your priority is value.

  • Better valuation composite
Best for: value
PRZO
ParaZero Technologies Ltd.
The Income Pick

PRZO is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • beta 1.94
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.94, current ratio 3.87x
  • Beta 1.94, current ratio 3.87x
  • Beta 1.94 vs RCAT's 3.31
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
RCAT
Red Cat Holdings, Inc.
The Growth Play

RCAT has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 459.8%, EPS growth 29.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 106.6%
  • 459.8% revenue growth vs AMODW's -15.8%
  • +92.6% vs AMODW's -70.2%
Best for: growth exposure
AEYE
AudioEye, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

AEYE is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.

  • 102.2% 10Y total return vs AMODW's -64.3%
  • -7.6% margin vs PRZO's -10.8%
  • -9.5% ROA vs AMODW's -18.8%
Best for: long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthRCAT logoRCAT459.8% revenue growth vs AMODW's -15.8%
ValueAMODW logoAMODWBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsAEYE logoAEYE-7.6% margin vs PRZO's -10.8%
Stability / SafetyPRZO logoPRZOBeta 1.94 vs RCAT's 3.31
DividendsTieNone of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)RCAT logoRCAT+92.6% vs AMODW's -70.2%
Efficiency (ROA)AEYE logoAEYE-9.5% ROA vs AMODW's -18.8%

AMODW vs PRZO vs RCAT vs AEYE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

AMODWAlpha Modus Holdings, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

PRZOParaZero Technologies Ltd.

Segment breakdown not available.

RCATRed Cat Holdings, Inc.
FY 2023
Corporate and Other
50.0%$10M
Consumer
26.7%$5M
Other Segments
23.3%$5M
AEYEAudioEye, Inc.
FY 2024
Enterprise
100.0%$15M

AMODW vs PRZO vs RCAT vs AEYE — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLAEYELAGGINGPRZO

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

AEYE leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

AEYE and AMODW operate at a comparable scale, with $40M and $0 in trailing revenue. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from -7.6% (AEYE) to -10.8% (PRZO). On growth, PRZO holds the edge at +26.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricAMODW logoAMODWAlpha Modus Holdi…PRZO logoPRZOParaZero Technolo…RCAT logoRCATRed Cat Holdings,…AEYE logoAEYEAudioEye, Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$0$857,883$26M$40M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$4M-$6M-$58M-$504,000
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$8M-$9M-$59M-$3M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$2M-$5M-$75M$2M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue-9.9%+7.9%+78.3%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-7.3%-2.3%-7.9%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-10.8%-2.3%-7.6%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-6.2%-2.9%+5.5%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+26.6%+7.9%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-176.2%-43.1%+29.0%
AEYE leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

AEYE leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
MetricAMODW logoAMODWAlpha Modus Holdi…PRZO logoPRZOParaZero Technolo…RCAT logoRCATRed Cat Holdings,…AEYE logoAEYEAudioEye, Inc.
Market CapShares × price$862,310$8M$1.0B$100M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$4M$5M$875M$96M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS0.21x-0.66x-17.27x-32.36x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.94.27x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple0.88x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue8.96x25.15x2.49x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share5.03x20.91x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF
AEYE leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

Evenly matched — RCAT and AEYE each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

RCAT delivers a -33.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-34 in annual profit, vs $-3 for PRZO. RCAT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.07x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AEYE's 0.15x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AMODW scores 4/9 vs PRZO's 2/9, reflecting mixed financial health.

MetricAMODW logoAMODWAlpha Modus Holdi…PRZO logoPRZOParaZero Technolo…RCAT logoRCATRed Cat Holdings,…AEYE logoAEYEAudioEye, Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-2.6%-33.6%-47.8%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-18.8%-146.0%-28.8%-9.5%
ROICReturn on invested capital-71.0%-42.4%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-92.1%-42.9%-17.7%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–94244
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.07x0.15x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$3M-$4M-$149M-$5M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$735,814$4M$168M$5M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$4M$419,480$18M$721,000
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-1.15x-2.79x
Evenly matched — RCAT and AEYE each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

RCAT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in RCAT five years ago would be worth $26,979 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,811 for PRZO. Over the past 12 months, RCAT leads with a +92.6% total return vs AMODW's -70.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors RCAT at 125.5% vs PRZO's -43.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricAMODW logoAMODWAlpha Modus Holdi…PRZO logoPRZOParaZero Technolo…RCAT logoRCATRed Cat Holdings,…AEYE logoAEYEAudioEye, Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-51.2%-44.7%+13.1%-18.7%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-70.2%-21.5%+92.6%-27.9%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-64.3%-81.9%+1047.3%+20.6%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-64.3%-81.9%+169.8%-60.2%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-64.3%-81.9%-97.8%+102.2%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-29.0%-43.4%+125.5%+6.4%
RCAT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — PRZO and RCAT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

PRZO is the less volatile stock with a 1.94 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RCAT's 3.31 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. RCAT currently trades 55.2% from its 52-week high vs AMODW's 15.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricAMODW logoAMODWAlpha Modus Holdi…PRZO logoPRZOParaZero Technolo…RCAT logoRCATRed Cat Holdings,…AEYE logoAEYEAudioEye, Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.94x1.78x3.09x2.18x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$0.18$2.15$18.78$16.39
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.02$0.65$5.23$5.31
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+15.1%+30.3%+55.2%+49.4%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10036.341.239.461.3
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded7K1.0M15.8M194K
Evenly matched — PRZO and RCAT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
MetricAMODW logoAMODWAlpha Modus Holdi…PRZO logoPRZOParaZero Technolo…RCAT logoRCATRed Cat Holdings,…AEYE logoAEYEAudioEye, Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$17.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts2
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises1
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

AEYE leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). RCAT leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.

Best OverallAudioEye, Inc. (AEYE)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

AMODW vs PRZO vs RCAT vs AEYE: Key Questions Answered

8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is AMODW or PRZO or RCAT or AEYE a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Red Cat Holdings, Inc.

(RCAT) is the stronger pick with 459. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 14. 5% for AudioEye, Inc. (AEYE). Alpha Modus Holdings, Inc. (AMODW) offers the better valuation at 0. 2x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Red Cat Holdings, Inc. (RCAT) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which is the better long-term investment — AMODW or PRZO or RCAT or AEYE?

Over the past 5 years, Red Cat Holdings, Inc.

(RCAT) delivered a total return of +169. 8%, compared to -81. 9% for ParaZero Technologies Ltd. (PRZO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AEYE returned +96. 5% versus RCAT's -97. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

03

Which is safer — AMODW or PRZO or RCAT or AEYE?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), ParaZero Technologies Ltd.

(PRZO) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 78β versus Red Cat Holdings, Inc. 's 3. 09β — meaning RCAT is approximately 74% more volatile than PRZO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Red Cat Holdings, Inc. (RCAT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 7% versus 15% for AudioEye, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

04

Which is growing faster — AMODW or PRZO or RCAT or AEYE?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Red Cat Holdings, Inc.

(RCAT) is pulling ahead at 459. 8% versus 14. 5% for AudioEye, Inc. (AEYE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Alpha Modus Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 917. 6% year-over-year, compared to -28. 6% for ParaZero Technologies Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, RCAT leads at 106. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

05

Which has better profit margins — AMODW or PRZO or RCAT or AEYE?

Alpha Modus Holdings, Inc.

(AMODW) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -1185. 9% for ParaZero Technologies Ltd. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AMODW leads at 0. 0% versus -597. 1% for PRZO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AEYE leads at 78. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

06

Which pays a better dividend — AMODW or PRZO or RCAT or AEYE?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

07

Is AMODW or PRZO or RCAT or AEYE better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, ParaZero Technologies Ltd.

(PRZO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. Red Cat Holdings, Inc. (RCAT) carries a higher beta of 3. 09 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (PRZO: -82. 3%, RCAT: -97. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

08

What are the main differences between AMODW and PRZO and RCAT and AEYE?

These companies operate in different sectors (AMODW (Technology) and PRZO (Industrials) and RCAT (Technology) and AEYE (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: AMODW is a small-cap deep-value stock; PRZO is a small-cap high-growth stock; RCAT is a small-cap high-growth stock; AEYE is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

AMODW

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

PRZO

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 13%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

RCAT

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 229%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

AEYE

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Gross Margin > 46%
Run This Screen

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.