Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

AMPH vs SUPN vs LNTH vs PCRX

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
AMPH
Amphastar Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$846M
5Y Perf.+1.9%
SUPN
Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.97B
5Y Perf.+113.6%
LNTH
Lantheus Holdings, Inc.

Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$6.06B
5Y Perf.+577.8%
PCRX
Pacira BioSciences, Inc.

Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$911M
5Y Perf.-47.3%

AMPH vs SUPN vs LNTH vs PCRX — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
AMPH logoAMPH
SUPN logoSUPN
LNTH logoLNTH
PCRX logoPCRX
IndustryDrug Manufacturers - Specialty & GenericDrug Manufacturers - Specialty & GenericDrug Manufacturers - Specialty & GenericDrug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
Market Cap$846M$2.97B$6.06B$911M
Revenue (TTM)$721M$777M$1.55B$735M
Net Income (TTM)$79M$-29M$279M$9M
Gross Margin47.3%89.4%60.5%60.2%
Operating Margin16.2%-5.5%18.8%3.4%
Forward P/E6.0x20.8x17.7x8.1x
Total Debt$656M$41M$738K$454M
Cash & Equiv.$170M$128M$359M$159M

AMPH vs SUPN vs LNTH vs PCRXLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

AMPH
SUPN
LNTH
PCRX
StockMay 20May 26Return
Amphastar Pharmaceu… (AMPH)100101.9+1.9%
Supernus Pharmaceut… (SUPN)100213.6+113.6%
Lantheus Holdings, … (LNTH)100677.8+577.8%
Pacira BioSciences,… (PCRX)10052.7-47.3%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: AMPH vs SUPN vs LNTH vs PCRX

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: SUPN and LNTH are tied at the top with 2 categories each — the right choice depends on your priorities. Lantheus Holdings, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and operational efficiency and capital deployment. AMPH and PCRX also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
AMPH
Amphastar Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
The Value Play

AMPH is the clearest fit if your priority is value.

  • Lower P/E (6.0x vs 17.7x)
Best for: value
SUPN
Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
The Growth Leader

SUPN has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth and momentum.

  • 8.6% revenue growth vs AMPH's -1.7%
  • +63.4% vs AMPH's -22.9%
Best for: growth and momentum
LNTH
Lantheus Holdings, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

LNTH is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.

  • 42.9% 10Y total return vs SUPN's 223.7%
  • 18.0% margin vs SUPN's -3.7%
  • 12.4% ROA vs SUPN's -2.0%, ROIC 30.6% vs -2.8%
Best for: long-term compounding
PCRX
Pacira BioSciences, Inc.
The Income Pick

PCRX is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.

  • beta 0.41
  • Rev growth 3.6%, EPS growth 107.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 2.9%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.41, Low D/E 65.6%, current ratio 4.54x
  • Beta 0.41, current ratio 4.54x
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthSUPN logoSUPN8.6% revenue growth vs AMPH's -1.7%
ValueAMPH logoAMPHLower P/E (6.0x vs 17.7x)
Quality / MarginsLNTH logoLNTH18.0% margin vs SUPN's -3.7%
Stability / SafetyPCRX logoPCRXBeta 0.41 vs AMPH's 1.27, lower leverage
DividendsTieNone of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)SUPN logoSUPN+63.4% vs AMPH's -22.9%
Efficiency (ROA)LNTH logoLNTH12.4% ROA vs SUPN's -2.0%, ROIC 30.6% vs -2.8%

AMPH vs SUPN vs LNTH vs PCRX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

AMPHAmphastar Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
FY 2025
Epinephrine
100.0%$71M
SUPNSupernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
FY 2025
Product
47.2%$627M
Qelbree
22.9%$305M
GOCOVRI
11.1%$147M
Collaboration Revenue
4.0%$53M
APOKYN
3.6%$48M
Trokendi Xr
3.2%$42M
Oxtellar X R
3.1%$41M
Other (2)
5.0%$66M
LNTHLantheus Holdings, Inc.
FY 2025
Product
33.4%$1.5B
Radiopharmaceutical Oncology
21.9%$989M
PYLARIFY
21.9%$989M
Total Precision Diagnostics
10.9%$493M
DEFINITY
7.3%$330M
Techne Lite
1.9%$87M
Strategic Partnerships And Other
1.3%$59M
Other (2)
1.3%$59M
PCRXPacira BioSciences, Inc.
FY 2025
Product
50.9%$723M
EXPAREL
40.5%$575M
ZILRETTA
8.2%$117M
Bupivacaine Liposome Injectable Suspension
0.5%$7M

AMPH vs SUPN vs LNTH vs PCRX — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLAMPHLAGGINGPCRX

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — SUPN and LNTH each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

LNTH is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.5B annually — 2.1x AMPH's $721M. LNTH is the more profitable business, keeping 18.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SUPN's -3.7%. On growth, SUPN holds the edge at +38.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricAMPH logoAMPHAmphastar Pharmac…SUPN logoSUPNSupernus Pharmace…LNTH logoLNTHLantheus Holdings…PCRX logoPCRXPacira BioScience…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$721M$777M$1.5B$735M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$150M$29M$347M$95M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$79M-$29M$279M$9M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$135M$82M$372M$133M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+47.3%+89.4%+60.5%+60.2%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+16.2%-5.5%+18.8%+3.4%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+11.0%-3.7%+18.0%+1.3%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+18.8%+10.6%+24.0%+18.1%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+0.4%+38.6%+1.2%+5.0%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-72.5%+81.0%+76.5%-30.0%
Evenly matched — SUPN and LNTH each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

AMPH leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 9.4x trailing earnings, AMPH trades at a 94% valuation discount to PCRX's 144.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, AMPH's 8.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SUPN's 52.6x.

MetricAMPH logoAMPHAmphastar Pharmac…SUPN logoSUPNSupernus Pharmace…LNTH logoLNTHLantheus Holdings…PCRX logoPCRXPacira BioScience…
Market CapShares × price$846M$3.0B$6.1B$911M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$1.3B$2.9B$5.7B$1.2B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS9.36x-75.78x27.29x144.69x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.6.04x20.81x17.70x8.13x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.07x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple8.93x52.65x14.96x9.70x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.18x4.13x3.93x1.25x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.16x2.74x5.84x1.50x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF6.98x64.51x17.11x6.66x
AMPH leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

LNTH leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.

LNTH delivers a 24.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $24 in annual profit, vs $-3 for SUPN. LNTH carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AMPH's 0.83x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PCRX scores 9/9 vs SUPN's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricAMPH logoAMPHAmphastar Pharmac…SUPN logoSUPNSupernus Pharmace…LNTH logoLNTHLantheus Holdings…PCRX logoPCRXPacira BioScience…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+10.2%-2.7%+24.3%+1.3%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+4.8%-2.0%+12.4%+0.7%
ROICReturn on invested capital+8.4%-2.8%+30.6%+2.3%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+9.8%-3.4%+17.1%+2.8%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–96459
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.83x0.04x0.00x0.66x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$486M-$87M-$358M$296M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$170M$128M$359M$159M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$656M$41M$738,000$454M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense9.93x15.83x2.37x
LNTH leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

Evenly matched — SUPN and LNTH each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in LNTH five years ago would be worth $43,814 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,802 for PCRX. Over the past 12 months, SUPN leads with a +63.4% total return vs AMPH's -22.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SUPN at 11.9% vs AMPH's -19.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricAMPH logoAMPHAmphastar Pharmac…SUPN logoSUPNSupernus Pharmace…LNTH logoLNTHLantheus Holdings…PCRX logoPCRXPacira BioScience…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-28.2%+4.2%+38.3%-5.4%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-22.9%+63.4%+15.7%-7.1%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-47.8%+40.1%-1.9%-45.2%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-0.8%+75.6%+338.1%-62.0%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+60.3%+223.7%+4289.6%-52.2%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-19.5%+11.9%-0.6%-18.2%
Evenly matched — SUPN and LNTH each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — LNTH and PCRX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

PCRX is the less volatile stock with a 0.41 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AMPH's 1.27 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LNTH currently trades 98.1% from its 52-week high vs AMPH's 60.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricAMPH logoAMPHAmphastar Pharmac…SUPN logoSUPNSupernus Pharmace…LNTH logoLNTHLantheus Holdings…PCRX logoPCRXPacira BioScience…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.27x0.80x0.45x0.41x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$31.26$59.68$94.86$27.64
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$17.04$30.44$47.25$18.80
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+60.8%+86.3%+98.1%+83.8%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10069.961.169.945.5
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded545K594K872K663K
Evenly matched — LNTH and PCRX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: AMPH as "Hold", SUPN as "Buy", LNTH as "Buy", PCRX as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 36.8% upside for AMPH (target: $26) vs 6.7% for LNTH (target: $99).

MetricAMPH logoAMPHAmphastar Pharmac…SUPN logoSUPNSupernus Pharmace…LNTH logoLNTHLantheus Holdings…PCRX logoPCRXPacira BioScience…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuyBuyHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$26.00$60.00$99.25$29.50
# AnalystsCovering analysts12141736
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises0
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+8.9%0.0%+5.0%+16.3%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

AMPH leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). LNTH leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.

Best OverallAmphastar Pharmaceuticals, … (AMPH)Leads 1 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

AMPH vs SUPN vs LNTH vs PCRX: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is AMPH or SUPN or LNTH or PCRX a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

(SUPN) is the stronger pick with 8. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 7% for Amphastar Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (AMPH). Amphastar Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (AMPH) offers the better valuation at 9. 4x trailing P/E (6. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (SUPN) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — AMPH or SUPN or LNTH or PCRX?

On trailing P/E, Amphastar Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

(AMPH) is the cheapest at 9. 4x versus Pacira BioSciences, Inc. at 144. 7x. On forward P/E, Amphastar Pharmaceuticals, Inc. is actually cheaper at 6. 0x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — AMPH or SUPN or LNTH or PCRX?

Over the past 5 years, Lantheus Holdings, Inc.

(LNTH) delivered a total return of +338. 1%, compared to -62. 0% for Pacira BioSciences, Inc. (PCRX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LNTH returned +42. 9% versus PCRX's -52. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — AMPH or SUPN or LNTH or PCRX?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Pacira BioSciences, Inc.

(PCRX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 41β versus Amphastar Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 's 1. 27β — meaning AMPH is approximately 209% more volatile than PCRX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Lantheus Holdings, Inc. (LNTH) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 83% for Amphastar Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — AMPH or SUPN or LNTH or PCRX?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

(SUPN) is pulling ahead at 8. 6% versus -1. 7% for Amphastar Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (AMPH). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Pacira BioSciences, Inc. grew EPS 107. 4% year-over-year, compared to -151. 5% for Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, LNTH leads at 18. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — AMPH or SUPN or LNTH or PCRX?

Lantheus Holdings, Inc.

(LNTH) is the more profitable company, earning 15. 2% net margin versus -5. 4% for Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — meaning it keeps 15. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LNTH leads at 20. 2% versus -5. 1% for SUPN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SUPN leads at 89. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is AMPH or SUPN or LNTH or PCRX more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Amphastar Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

(AMPH) trades at 6. 0x forward P/E versus 20. 8x for Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — 14. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AMPH: 36. 8% to $26. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — AMPH or SUPN or LNTH or PCRX?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

09

Is AMPH or SUPN or LNTH or PCRX better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Lantheus Holdings, Inc.

(LNTH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 45)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (LNTH: +42. 9%, AMPH: +60. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between AMPH and SUPN and LNTH and PCRX?

Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: AMPH is a small-cap deep-value stock; SUPN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LNTH is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PCRX is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

AMPH

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 6%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SUPN

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 19%
  • Gross Margin > 53%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

LNTH

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 10%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

PCRX

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Gross Margin > 36%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform AMPH and SUPN and LNTH and PCRX on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(AMPH: 0.4% · SUPN: 38.6%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.