Industrial - Machinery
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
AMSC vs MTRX vs ARRY vs POWI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Engineering & Construction
Solar
Semiconductors
AMSC vs MTRX vs ARRY vs POWI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Industrial - Machinery | Engineering & Construction | Solar | Semiconductors |
| Market Cap | $2.56B | $342M | $1.25B | $4.00B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $279M | $845M | $1.21B | $446M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $130M | $-15M | $-67M | $17M |
| Gross Margin | 30.6% | 6.2% | 22.4% | 53.9% |
| Operating Margin | 4.9% | -1.8% | 4.5% | 4.6% |
| Forward P/E | 15.4x | 143.1x | 11.7x | 55.5x |
| Total Debt | $3M | $21M | $766M | $0.00 |
| Cash & Equiv. | $79M | $225M | $244M | $59M |
AMSC vs MTRX vs ARRY vs POWI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| American Supercondu… (AMSC) | 100 | 382.6 | +282.6% |
| Matrix Service Comp… (MTRX) | 100 | 160.0 | +60.0% |
| Array Technologies,… (ARRY) | 100 | 22.3 | -77.7% |
| Power Integrations,… (POWI) | 100 | 119.3 | +19.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AMSC vs MTRX vs ARRY vs POWI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AMSC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 53.0%, EPS growth 143.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 27.1%
- 379.0% 10Y total return vs POWI's 232.7%
- 53.0% revenue growth vs MTRX's 5.6%
- 46.7% margin vs ARRY's -5.6%
MTRX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.62, Low D/E 15.0%, current ratio 0.96x
- Beta 1.62 vs AMSC's 2.90
ARRY is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (11.7x vs 55.5x)
POWI is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 18 yrs, beta 2.08, yield 1.2%
- Beta 2.08, yield 1.2%, current ratio 6.51x
- 1.2% yield; 18-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 53.0% revenue growth vs MTRX's 5.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.7x vs 55.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 46.7% margin vs ARRY's -5.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.62 vs AMSC's 2.90 | |
| Dividends | 1.2% yield; 18-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +156.9% vs MTRX's -0.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 18.1% ROA vs ARRY's -4.4%, ROIC -0.9% vs 9.0% |
AMSC vs MTRX vs ARRY vs POWI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
AMSC vs MTRX vs ARRY vs POWI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
AMSC leads in 3 of 6 categories
MTRX leads 1 • POWI leads 1 • ARRY leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMSC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ARRY is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.2B annually — 4.3x AMSC's $279M. AMSC is the more profitable business, keeping 46.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ARRY's -5.6%. On growth, AMSC holds the edge at +21.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $279M | $845M | $1.2B | $446M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $18M | -$6M | $95M | $41M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $130M | -$15M | -$67M | $17M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $16M | $50M | $58M | $85M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +30.6% | +6.2% | +22.4% | +53.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +4.9% | -1.8% | +4.5% | +4.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +46.7% | -1.8% | -5.6% | +3.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +5.7% | +5.9% | +4.8% | +18.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +21.4% | +3.3% | -26.1% | +2.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +39.9% | +124.4% | -7.0% | -60.0% |
Valuation Metrics
MTRX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 184.2x trailing earnings, POWI trades at a 45% valuation discount to AMSC's 332.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ARRY's 13.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than AMSC's 454.2x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.6B | $342M | $1.3B | $4.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.5B | $139M | $1.8B | $3.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 332.63x | -11.47x | -11.23x | 184.18x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 15.37x | 143.06x | 11.75x | 55.51x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 454.16x | — | 13.50x | 79.69x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 11.47x | 0.44x | 0.98x | 9.02x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 10.18x | 2.37x | 4.80x | 6.01x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 98.78x | 3.12x | 15.72x | 45.93x |
Profitability & Efficiency
AMSC leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AMSC delivers a 24.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $24 in annual profit, vs $-21 for ARRY. AMSC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ARRY's 2.94x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AMSC scores 7/9 vs MTRX's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +24.3% | -10.8% | -20.6% | +2.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +18.1% | -2.4% | -4.4% | +2.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -0.9% | -4.8% | +9.0% | +2.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.6% | -20.0% | +8.2% | +2.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.02x | 0.15x | 2.94x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$76M | -$203M | $522M | -$59M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $79M | $225M | $244M | $59M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3M | $21M | $766M | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -26.70x | -2.42x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AMSC leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AMSC five years ago would be worth $35,504 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,233 for ARRY. Over the past 12 months, AMSC leads with a +156.9% total return vs MTRX's -0.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AMSC at 139.0% vs ARRY's -24.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +68.5% | +0.9% | -15.3% | +93.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +156.9% | -0.8% | +62.7% | +44.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1264.6% | +125.2% | -56.1% | -6.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +255.0% | -12.3% | -67.7% | -8.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +379.0% | -18.3% | -77.5% | +232.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +139.0% | +31.1% | -24.0% | -2.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MTRX and POWI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MTRX is the less volatile stock with a 1.62 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AMSC's 2.90 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. POWI currently trades 91.0% from its 52-week high vs ARRY's 67.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.90x | 1.62x | 2.32x | 2.08x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $70.49 | $16.11 | $12.23 | $78.94 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $20.43 | $9.88 | $4.92 | $30.86 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +75.5% | +75.5% | +67.0% | +91.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 74.0 | 74.6 | 56.4 | 76.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.1M | 277K | 6.0M | 967K |
Analyst Outlook
POWI leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: AMSC as "Buy", MTRX as "Buy", ARRY as "Buy", POWI as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 97.4% upside for MTRX (target: $24) vs 10.0% for POWI (target: $79). POWI is the only dividend payer here at 1.17% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $61.50 | $24.00 | $9.17 | $79.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 15 | 13 | 28 | 16 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +1.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 1 | 18 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $0.84 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.0% | +0.4% | 0.0% | +2.5% |
AMSC leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). MTRX leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
AMSC vs MTRX vs ARRY vs POWI: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AMSC or MTRX or ARRY or POWI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, American Superconductor Corporation (AMSC) is the stronger pick with 53.
0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 6% for Matrix Service Company (MTRX). Power Integrations, Inc. (POWI) offers the better valuation at 184. 2x trailing P/E (55. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate American Superconductor Corporation (AMSC) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AMSC or MTRX or ARRY or POWI?
On trailing P/E, Power Integrations, Inc.
(POWI) is the cheapest at 184. 2x versus American Superconductor Corporation at 332. 6x. On forward P/E, Array Technologies, Inc. is actually cheaper at 11. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AMSC or MTRX or ARRY or POWI?
Over the past 5 years, American Superconductor Corporation (AMSC) delivered a total return of +255.
0%, compared to -67. 7% for Array Technologies, Inc. (ARRY). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AMSC returned +379. 0% versus ARRY's -77. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AMSC or MTRX or ARRY or POWI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Matrix Service Company (MTRX) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
62β versus American Superconductor Corporation's 2. 90β — meaning AMSC is approximately 79% more volatile than MTRX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, American Superconductor Corporation (AMSC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 3% for Array Technologies, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AMSC or MTRX or ARRY or POWI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), American Superconductor Corporation (AMSC) is pulling ahead at 53.
0% versus 5. 6% for Matrix Service Company (MTRX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: American Superconductor Corporation grew EPS 143. 2% year-over-year, compared to -30. 4% for Power Integrations, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, AMSC leads at 27. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AMSC or MTRX or ARRY or POWI?
Power Integrations, Inc.
(POWI) is the more profitable company, earning 5. 0% net margin versus -4. 1% for Array Technologies, Inc. — meaning it keeps 5. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ARRY leads at 6. 6% versus -4. 6% for MTRX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — POWI leads at 54. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AMSC or MTRX or ARRY or POWI more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Array Technologies, Inc.
(ARRY) trades at 11. 7x forward P/E versus 143. 1x for Matrix Service Company — 131. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MTRX: 97. 4% to $24. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — AMSC or MTRX or ARRY or POWI?
In this comparison, POWI (1.
2% yield) pays a dividend. AMSC, MTRX, ARRY do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is AMSC or MTRX or ARRY or POWI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Power Integrations, Inc.
(POWI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (1. 2% yield, +232. 7% 10Y return). Array Technologies, Inc. (ARRY) carries a higher beta of 2. 32 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (POWI: +232. 7%, ARRY: -77. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AMSC and MTRX and ARRY and POWI?
These companies operate in different sectors (AMSC (Industrials) and MTRX (Industrials) and ARRY (Energy) and POWI (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: AMSC is a small-cap high-growth stock; MTRX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ARRY is a small-cap high-growth stock; POWI is a small-cap quality compounder stock. POWI pays a dividend while AMSC, MTRX, ARRY do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.