Industrial - Machinery
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
AMSC vs POWI vs VICR vs MPWR vs SLAB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Semiconductors
Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Semiconductors
Semiconductors
AMSC vs POWI vs VICR vs MPWR vs SLAB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Industrial - Machinery | Semiconductors | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Semiconductors | Semiconductors |
| Market Cap | $2.56B | $4.00B | $11.79B | $77.41B | $7.17B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $279M | $446M | $453M | $2.79B | $785M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $130M | $17M | $119M | $616M | $-65M |
| Gross Margin | 30.6% | 53.9% | 57.3% | 55.2% | 58.2% |
| Operating Margin | 4.9% | 4.6% | 18.1% | 26.1% | -9.0% |
| Forward P/E | 15.4x | 55.5x | 94.3x | 73.1x | 80.4x |
| Total Debt | $3M | $0.00 | $13M | $24M | $0.00 |
| Cash & Equiv. | $79M | $59M | $403M | $1.10B | $364M |
AMSC vs POWI vs VICR vs MPWR vs SLAB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| American Supercondu… (AMSC) | 100 | 734.1 | +634.1% |
| Power Integrations,… (POWI) | 100 | 132.6 | +32.6% |
| Vicor Corporation (VICR) | 100 | 428.6 | +328.6% |
| Monolithic Power Sy… (MPWR) | 100 | 751.4 | +651.4% |
| Silicon Laboratorie… (SLAB) | 100 | 232.4 | +132.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AMSC vs POWI vs VICR vs MPWR vs SLAB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AMSC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 53.0%, EPS growth 143.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 27.1%
- 53.0% revenue growth vs POWI's 5.9%
- Lower P/E (15.4x vs 80.4x)
- 46.7% margin vs SLAB's -8.3%
POWI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.
- Dividend streak 18 yrs, beta 2.08, yield 1.2%
- Beta 2.08, yield 1.2%, current ratio 6.51x
- 1.2% yield, 18-year raise streak, vs MPWR's 0.4%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
VICR ranks third and is worth considering specifically for valuation efficiency.
- PEG 2.10 vs MPWR's 2.48
- +5.4% vs POWI's +44.4%
MPWR is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 24.9% 10Y total return vs VICR's 27.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 2.28, Low D/E 0.7%, current ratio 5.91x
SLAB is the clearest fit if your priority is stability.
- Beta 1.25 vs AMSC's 2.90
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 53.0% revenue growth vs POWI's 5.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (15.4x vs 80.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 46.7% margin vs SLAB's -8.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.25 vs AMSC's 2.90 | |
| Dividends | 1.2% yield, 18-year raise streak, vs MPWR's 0.4%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +5.4% vs POWI's +44.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 18.1% ROA vs SLAB's -5.1%, ROIC -0.9% vs -6.9% |
AMSC vs POWI vs VICR vs MPWR vs SLAB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
AMSC vs POWI vs VICR vs MPWR vs SLAB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
POWI leads in 2 of 6 categories
MPWR leads 1 • VICR leads 1 • SLAB leads 1 • AMSC leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — AMSC and SLAB each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MPWR is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.8B annually — 10.0x AMSC's $279M. AMSC is the more profitable business, keeping 46.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SLAB's -8.3%. On growth, SLAB holds the edge at +25.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $279M | $446M | $453M | $2.8B | $785M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $18M | $41M | $103M | $781M | -$32M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $130M | $17M | $119M | $616M | -$65M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $16M | $85M | $119M | $664M | $66M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +30.6% | +53.9% | +57.3% | +55.2% | +58.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +4.9% | +4.6% | +18.1% | +26.1% | -9.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +46.7% | +3.7% | +26.2% | +22.1% | -8.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +5.7% | +18.9% | +26.3% | +23.8% | +8.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +21.4% | +2.6% | +11.5% | +20.8% | +25.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +39.9% | -60.0% | +3.4% | -88.4% | +88.8% |
Valuation Metrics
POWI leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 100.1x trailing earnings, VICR trades at a 70% valuation discount to AMSC's 332.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), VICR offers better value at 2.23x vs MPWR's 4.19x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.6B | $4.0B | $11.8B | $77.4B | $7.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.5B | $3.9B | $11.4B | $76.3B | $6.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 332.63x | 184.18x | 100.13x | 123.60x | -109.92x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 15.37x | 55.51x | 94.31x | 73.12x | 80.41x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 2.23x | 4.19x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 454.16x | 79.69x | 197.81x | 97.90x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 11.47x | 9.02x | 28.91x | 27.74x | 9.14x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 10.18x | 6.01x | 16.50x | 21.56x | 6.51x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 98.78x | 45.93x | 98.86x | 116.20x | 109.03x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MPWR leads this category, winning 4 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AMSC delivers a 24.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $24 in annual profit, vs $-6 for SLAB. MPWR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to VICR's 0.02x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AMSC scores 7/9 vs SLAB's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +24.3% | +2.4% | +18.7% | +17.9% | -5.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +18.1% | +2.1% | +16.6% | +15.2% | -5.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -0.9% | +2.4% | +8.9% | +22.2% | -6.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.6% | +2.9% | +5.7% | +20.4% | -6.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 | 7 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.02x | — | 0.02x | 0.01x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$76M | -$59M | -$390M | -$1.1B | -$364M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $79M | $59M | $403M | $1.1B | $364M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3M | $0 | $13M | $24M | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — | — | — | -58.63x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
VICR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MPWR five years ago would be worth $46,617 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,165 for POWI. Over the past 12 months, VICR leads with a +535.7% total return vs POWI's +44.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AMSC at 139.0% vs POWI's -2.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +68.5% | +93.2% | +123.6% | +68.5% | +65.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +156.9% | +44.4% | +535.7% | +148.6% | +100.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1264.6% | -6.3% | +507.9% | +280.3% | +59.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +255.0% | -8.3% | +201.3% | +366.2% | +61.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +379.0% | +232.7% | +2704.1% | +2494.7% | +375.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +139.0% | -2.2% | +82.5% | +56.1% | +16.7% |
Risk & Volatility
SLAB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SLAB is the less volatile stock with a 1.25 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AMSC's 2.90 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SLAB currently trades 99.5% from its 52-week high vs AMSC's 75.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.90x | 2.08x | 2.79x | 2.28x | 1.25x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $70.49 | $78.94 | $293.95 | $1662.00 | $218.66 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $20.43 | $30.86 | $40.27 | $613.00 | $106.01 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +75.5% | +91.0% | +88.9% | +94.8% | +99.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 74.0 | 76.1 | 68.2 | 71.0 | 66.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.1M | 967K | 864K | 577K | 465K |
Analyst Outlook
POWI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: AMSC as "Buy", POWI as "Buy", VICR as "Buy", MPWR as "Buy", SLAB as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 15.6% upside for AMSC (target: $62) vs -6.3% for VICR (target: $245). For income investors, POWI offers the higher dividend yield at 1.17% vs MPWR's 0.37%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $61.50 | $79.00 | $245.00 | $1615.00 | $211.60 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 15 | 16 | 7 | 25 | 37 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.2% | — | +0.4% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 18 | 0 | 8 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.84 | — | $5.90 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.0% | +2.5% | +0.3% | +0.0% | 0.0% |
POWI leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). MPWR leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.
AMSC vs POWI vs VICR vs MPWR vs SLAB: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AMSC or POWI or VICR or MPWR or SLAB a better buy right now?
For growth investors, American Superconductor Corporation (AMSC) is the stronger pick with 53.
0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 9% for Power Integrations, Inc. (POWI). Vicor Corporation (VICR) offers the better valuation at 100. 1x trailing P/E (94. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate American Superconductor Corporation (AMSC) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AMSC or POWI or VICR or MPWR or SLAB?
On trailing P/E, Vicor Corporation (VICR) is the cheapest at 100.
1x versus American Superconductor Corporation at 332. 6x. On forward P/E, American Superconductor Corporation is actually cheaper at 15. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Vicor Corporation wins at 2. 10x versus Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. 's 2. 48x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AMSC or POWI or VICR or MPWR or SLAB?
Over the past 5 years, Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.
(MPWR) delivered a total return of +366. 2%, compared to -8. 3% for Power Integrations, Inc. (POWI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: VICR returned +27. 0% versus POWI's +232. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AMSC or POWI or VICR or MPWR or SLAB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Silicon Laboratories Inc.
(SLAB) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 25β versus American Superconductor Corporation's 2. 90β — meaning AMSC is approximately 132% more volatile than SLAB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. (MPWR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 2% for Vicor Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AMSC or POWI or VICR or MPWR or SLAB?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), American Superconductor Corporation (AMSC) is pulling ahead at 53.
0% versus 5. 9% for Power Integrations, Inc. (POWI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Vicor Corporation grew EPS 1764% year-over-year, compared to -65. 2% for Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, AMSC leads at 27. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AMSC or POWI or VICR or MPWR or SLAB?
Vicor Corporation (VICR) is the more profitable company, earning 29.
1% net margin versus -8. 3% for Silicon Laboratories Inc. — meaning it keeps 29. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MPWR leads at 26. 1% versus -9. 0% for SLAB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SLAB leads at 58. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AMSC or POWI or VICR or MPWR or SLAB more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Vicor Corporation (VICR) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 2. 10x versus Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. 's 2. 48x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, American Superconductor Corporation (AMSC) trades at 15. 4x forward P/E versus 94. 3x for Vicor Corporation — 78. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AMSC: 15. 6% to $61. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — AMSC or POWI or VICR or MPWR or SLAB?
In this comparison, POWI (1.
2% yield), MPWR (0. 4% yield) pay a dividend. AMSC, VICR, SLAB do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is AMSC or POWI or VICR or MPWR or SLAB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Silicon Laboratories Inc.
(SLAB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 25), +375. 0% 10Y return). Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. (MPWR) carries a higher beta of 2. 28 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SLAB: +375. 0%, MPWR: +24. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AMSC and POWI and VICR and MPWR and SLAB?
These companies operate in different sectors (AMSC (Industrials) and POWI (Technology) and VICR (Technology) and MPWR (Technology) and SLAB (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: AMSC is a small-cap high-growth stock; POWI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; VICR is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; MPWR is a mid-cap high-growth stock; SLAB is a small-cap high-growth stock. POWI pays a dividend while AMSC, VICR, MPWR, SLAB do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.