Software - Application
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
AMST vs LRN vs PRDO vs COUR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Education & Training Services
Education & Training Services
Education & Training Services
AMST vs LRN vs PRDO vs COUR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Education & Training Services | Education & Training Services | Education & Training Services |
| Market Cap | $4M | $3.90B | $2.16B | $1.06B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $289K | $2.54B | $855M | $774M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-3M | $308M | $170M | $-64M |
| Gross Margin | -14.5% | 38.3% | 51.8% | 54.8% |
| Operating Margin | -10.2% | 15.8% | 24.3% | -11.4% |
| Forward P/E | — | 13.0x | 12.0x | 15.2x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $550M | $105M | $5M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2M | $782M | $132M | $793M |
AMST vs LRN vs PRDO vs COUR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Mar 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Amesite Inc. (AMST) | 100 | 1.8 | -98.2% |
| Stride, Inc. (LRN) | 100 | 304.5 | +204.5% |
| Perdoceo Education … (PRDO) | 100 | 288.0 | +188.0% |
| Coursera, Inc. (COUR) | 100 | 13.9 | -86.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AMST vs LRN vs PRDO vs COUR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AMST plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
LRN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 17.9%, EPS growth 26.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 12.6%
- 6.7% 10Y total return vs PRDO's 5.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.46, Low D/E 37.2%, current ratio 5.39x
- PEG 0.22 vs PRDO's 1.77
PRDO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 0.48, yield 1.6%
- 24.2% revenue growth vs AMST's -33.8%
- 19.9% margin vs AMST's -10.3%
- 1.6% yield; 5-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
COUR lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 24.2% revenue growth vs AMST's -33.8% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 19.9% margin vs AMST's -10.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.46 vs AMST's 1.26 | |
| Dividends | 1.6% yield; 5-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +15.4% vs AMST's -58.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.2% ROA vs AMST's -148.3%, ROIC 15.3% vs -6.4% |
AMST vs LRN vs PRDO vs COUR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
AMST vs LRN vs PRDO vs COUR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
PRDO leads in 2 of 6 categories
COUR leads 1 • LRN leads 1 • AMST leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PRDO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LRN is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.5B annually — 8780.2x AMST's $288,795. PRDO is the more profitable business, keeping 19.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AMST's -10.3%. On growth, AMST holds the edge at +7.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $288,795 | $2.5B | $855M | $774M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$3M | $525M | $247M | -$67M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$3M | $308M | $170M | -$64M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$2M | $400M | $221M | $84M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -14.5% | +38.3% | +51.8% | +54.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -10.2% | +15.8% | +24.3% | -11.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -10.3% | +12.2% | +19.9% | -8.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -7.8% | +15.8% | +25.8% | +10.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +7.5% | +2.7% | +4.1% | +9.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +60.0% | -7.4% | +30.8% | -140.0% |
Valuation Metrics
COUR leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.2x trailing earnings, PRDO trades at a 8% valuation discount to LRN's 15.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), LRN offers better value at 0.26x vs PRDO's 2.09x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4M | $3.9B | $2.2B | $1.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2M | $3.7B | $2.1B | $274M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.88x | 15.41x | 14.23x | -20.23x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 13.02x | 12.04x | 15.19x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.26x | 2.09x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 7.73x | 8.97x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 37.68x | 1.62x | 2.55x | 1.40x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.17x | 3.00x | 2.34x | 1.62x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 10.47x | 9.97x | 9.90x |
Profitability & Efficiency
LRN leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LRN delivers a 19.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $20 in annual profit, vs $-196 for AMST. COUR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LRN's 0.37x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LRN scores 7/9 vs AMST's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -196.4% | +19.9% | +17.2% | -10.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -148.3% | +13.1% | +13.2% | -6.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -6.4% | +22.0% | +15.3% | — |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -137.2% | +19.6% | +17.5% | -12.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 7 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.37x | 0.11x | 0.01x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$2M | -$233M | -$27M | -$788M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2M | $782M | $132M | $793M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $550M | $105M | $5M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 36.09x | 50.21x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — LRN and PRDO each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in LRN five years ago would be worth $32,308 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $281 for AMST. Over the past 12 months, PRDO leads with a +15.4% total return vs AMST's -58.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PRDO at 43.5% vs AMST's -37.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -54.5% | +41.9% | +18.9% | -11.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -58.3% | -42.3% | +15.4% | -28.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -75.8% | +122.2% | +195.8% | -44.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.2% | +223.1% | +198.5% | -82.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.5% | +666.0% | +505.6% | -86.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -37.7% | +30.5% | +43.5% | -17.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — LRN and PRDO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LRN is the less volatile stock with a 0.46 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AMST's 1.26 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PRDO currently trades 89.5% from its 52-week high vs AMST's 19.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.26x | 0.46x | 0.48x | 0.80x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.78 | $171.17 | $38.50 | $13.56 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.85 | $60.61 | $26.66 | $5.00 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +19.0% | +53.6% | +89.5% | +46.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 33.6 | 49.4 | 46.2 | 50.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 336K | 744K | 584K | 4.7M |
Analyst Outlook
PRDO leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: LRN as "Hold", PRDO as "Hold", COUR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 24.2% upside for COUR (target: $8) vs -12.9% for PRDO (target: $30). PRDO is the only dividend payer here at 1.62% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $109.50 | $30.00 | $7.79 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 17 | 9 | 17 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +1.6% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 | 5 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $0.56 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.5% | +5.6% | 0.0% |
PRDO leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Analyst Outlook). COUR leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
AMST vs LRN vs PRDO vs COUR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AMST or LRN or PRDO or COUR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Perdoceo Education Corporation (PRDO) is the stronger pick with 24.
2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -33. 8% for Amesite Inc. (AMST). Perdoceo Education Corporation (PRDO) offers the better valuation at 14. 2x trailing P/E (12. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Coursera, Inc. (COUR) a "Buy" — based on 17 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AMST or LRN or PRDO or COUR?
On trailing P/E, Perdoceo Education Corporation (PRDO) is the cheapest at 14.
2x versus Stride, Inc. at 15. 4x. On forward P/E, Perdoceo Education Corporation is actually cheaper at 12. 0x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Stride, Inc. wins at 0. 22x versus Perdoceo Education Corporation's 1. 77x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AMST or LRN or PRDO or COUR?
Over the past 5 years, Stride, Inc.
(LRN) delivered a total return of +223. 1%, compared to -97. 2% for Amesite Inc. (AMST). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LRN returned +666. 0% versus AMST's -98. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AMST or LRN or PRDO or COUR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Stride, Inc.
(LRN) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 46β versus Amesite Inc. 's 1. 26β — meaning AMST is approximately 173% more volatile than LRN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Coursera, Inc. (COUR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 37% for Stride, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AMST or LRN or PRDO or COUR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Perdoceo Education Corporation (PRDO) is pulling ahead at 24.
2% versus -33. 8% for Amesite Inc. (AMST). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Amesite Inc. grew EPS 40. 5% year-over-year, compared to 10. 5% for Perdoceo Education Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, COUR leads at 13. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AMST or LRN or PRDO or COUR?
Perdoceo Education Corporation (PRDO) is the more profitable company, earning 18.
9% net margin versus -32. 7% for Amesite Inc. — meaning it keeps 18. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PRDO leads at 23. 2% versus -32. 6% for AMST. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PRDO leads at 71. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AMST or LRN or PRDO or COUR more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Stride, Inc. (LRN) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 22x versus Perdoceo Education Corporation's 1. 77x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Perdoceo Education Corporation (PRDO) trades at 12. 0x forward P/E versus 15. 2x for Coursera, Inc. — 3. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for COUR: 24. 2% to $7. 79.
08Which pays a better dividend — AMST or LRN or PRDO or COUR?
In this comparison, PRDO (1.
6% yield) pays a dividend. AMST, LRN, COUR do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is AMST or LRN or PRDO or COUR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Perdoceo Education Corporation (PRDO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
48), 1. 6% yield, +505. 6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (PRDO: +505. 6%, AMST: -98. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AMST and LRN and PRDO and COUR?
These companies operate in different sectors (AMST (Technology) and LRN (Consumer Defensive) and PRDO (Consumer Defensive) and COUR (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: AMST is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LRN is a small-cap high-growth stock; PRDO is a small-cap high-growth stock; COUR is a small-cap quality compounder stock. PRDO pays a dividend while AMST, LRN, COUR do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.