REIT - Specialty
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
AMT vs IRM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Specialty
AMT vs IRM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Specialty | REIT - Specialty |
| Market Cap | $83.94B | $39.29B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $10.82B | $7.25B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $2.88B | $272M |
| Gross Margin | 73.4% | 55.0% |
| Operating Margin | 44.2% | 18.0% |
| Forward P/E | 27.5x | 58.6x |
| Total Debt | $44.96B | $19.05B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.47B | $159M |
AMT vs IRM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| American Tower Corp… (AMT) | 100 | 69.8 | -30.2% |
| Iron Mountain Incor… (IRM) | 100 | 512.7 | +412.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AMT vs IRM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AMT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 11 yrs, beta -0.04, yield 3.7%
- Beta -0.04, yield 3.7%, current ratio 0.63x
- Lower P/E (27.5x vs 58.6x)
IRM is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 12.2%, EPS growth -19.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 10.6%
- 314.2% 10Y total return vs AMT's 114.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.10, current ratio 0.74x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 12.2% FFO/revenue growth vs AMT's 5.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (27.5x vs 58.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 26.6% margin vs IRM's 3.8% | |
| Dividends | 3.7% yield, 11-year raise streak, vs IRM's 2.3% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +39.7% vs AMT's -16.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.5% ROA vs IRM's 1.3%, ROIC 6.9% vs 6.2% |
AMT vs IRM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
AMT vs IRM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMT and IRM operate at a comparable scale, with $10.8B and $7.2B in trailing revenue. AMT is the more profitable business, keeping 26.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to IRM's 3.8%. On growth, IRM holds the edge at +21.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $10.8B | $7.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $6.9B | $2.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $2.9B | $272M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $3.8B | -$625M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +73.4% | +55.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +44.2% | +18.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +26.6% | +3.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +34.9% | -8.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.8% | +21.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +76.9% | +7.9% |
Valuation Metrics
AMT leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 33.4x trailing earnings, AMT trades at a 88% valuation discount to IRM's 269.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, AMT's 18.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than IRM's 23.9x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $83.9B | $39.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $127.4B | $58.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 33.42x | 269.51x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 27.49x | 58.61x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 4.58x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 18.36x | 23.94x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 7.88x | 5.69x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 8.16x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 22.18x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
AMT leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AMT scores 7/9 vs IRM's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +27.4% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.5% | +1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.9% | +6.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +8.6% | +8.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 4.34x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $43.5B | $18.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.5B | $159M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $45.0B | $19.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.99x | 1.28x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
IRM leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in IRM five years ago would be worth $34,991 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,668 for AMT. Over the past 12 months, IRM leads with a +39.7% total return vs AMT's -16.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors IRM at 36.0% vs AMT's 1.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +4.1% | +59.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -16.4% | +39.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +3.6% | +151.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -13.3% | +249.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +114.4% | +314.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +1.2% | +36.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — AMT and IRM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AMT is the less volatile stock with a -0.04 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than IRM's 1.10 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. IRM currently trades 98.5% from its 52-week high vs AMT's 76.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.04x | 1.10x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $234.33 | $134.09 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $165.08 | $77.77 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +76.9% | +98.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.2 | 77.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.9M | 1.5M |
Analyst Outlook
AMT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates AMT as "Buy" and IRM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 20.1% upside for AMT (target: $216) vs 0.2% for IRM (target: $132). For income investors, AMT offers the higher dividend yield at 3.74% vs IRM's 2.34%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $216.33 | $132.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 49 | 20 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.7% | +2.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 11 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $6.73 | $3.09 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.4% | 0.0% |
AMT leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). IRM leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
AMT vs IRM: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AMT or IRM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Iron Mountain Incorporated (IRM) is the stronger pick with 12.
2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 1% for American Tower Corporation (AMT). American Tower Corporation (AMT) offers the better valuation at 33. 4x trailing P/E (27. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate American Tower Corporation (AMT) a "Buy" — based on 49 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AMT or IRM?
On trailing P/E, American Tower Corporation (AMT) is the cheapest at 33.
4x versus Iron Mountain Incorporated at 269. 5x. On forward P/E, American Tower Corporation is actually cheaper at 27. 5x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AMT or IRM?
Over the past 5 years, Iron Mountain Incorporated (IRM) delivered a total return of +249.
9%, compared to -13. 3% for American Tower Corporation (AMT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IRM returned +314. 2% versus AMT's +114. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AMT or IRM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), American Tower Corporation (AMT) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
04β versus Iron Mountain Incorporated's 1. 10β — meaning IRM is approximately -3041% more volatile than AMT relative to the S&P 500.
05Which is growing faster — AMT or IRM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Iron Mountain Incorporated (IRM) is pulling ahead at 12.
2% versus 5. 1% for American Tower Corporation (AMT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: American Tower Corporation grew EPS 11. 8% year-over-year, compared to -19. 7% for Iron Mountain Incorporated. Over a 3-year CAGR, IRM leads at 10. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AMT or IRM?
American Tower Corporation (AMT) is the more profitable company, earning 23.
8% net margin versus 2. 1% for Iron Mountain Incorporated — meaning it keeps 23. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AMT leads at 45. 8% versus 20. 4% for IRM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AMT leads at 73. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AMT or IRM more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, American Tower Corporation (AMT) trades at 27.
5x forward P/E versus 58. 6x for Iron Mountain Incorporated — 31. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AMT: 20. 1% to $216. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — AMT or IRM?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
American Tower Corporation (AMT) offers the highest yield at 3. 7%, versus 2. 3% for Iron Mountain Incorporated (IRM).
09Is AMT or IRM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, American Tower Corporation (AMT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
04), 3. 7% yield, +114. 4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (AMT: +114. 4%, IRM: +314. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AMT and IRM?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: AMT is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; IRM is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.