AMWD vs CPRI vs TPR vs MHK

For growth investors, Tapestry, Inc.

(TPR) is the stronger pick with 5. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -7. 5% for American Woodmark Corporation (AMWD). American Woodmark Corporation (AMWD) offers the better valuation at 6. 1x trailing P/E (15. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Tapestry, Inc. (TPR) a "Buy" — based on 41 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, American Woodmark Corporation (AMWD) is the cheapest at 6.

1x versus Tapestry, Inc. at 159. 2x. On forward P/E, Mohawk Industries, Inc. is actually cheaper at 12. 1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, Tapestry, Inc.

(TPR) delivered a total return of +178. 3%, compared to -68. 6% for Capri Holdings Limited (CPRI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TPR returned +256. 5% versus CPRI's -63. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Mohawk Industries, Inc.

(MHK) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 42β versus Capri Holdings Limited's 2. 03β — meaning CPRI is approximately 42% more volatile than MHK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Mohawk Industries, Inc. (MHK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 33% versus 8% for Capri Holdings Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Tapestry, Inc.

(TPR) is pulling ahead at 5. 1% versus -7. 5% for American Woodmark Corporation (AMWD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Capri Holdings Limited grew EPS 0. 0% year-over-year, compared to -76. 6% for Tapestry, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TPR leads at 1. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

American Woodmark Corporation (AMWD) is the more profitable company, earning 5.

8% net margin versus -26. 6% for Capri Holdings Limited — meaning it keeps 5. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AMWD leads at 8. 2% versus -16. 9% for CPRI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TPR leads at 75. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, Mohawk Industries, Inc.

(MHK) trades at 12. 1x forward P/E versus 20. 3x for Tapestry, Inc. — 8. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CPRI: 37. 1% to $25. 63.

In this comparison, TPR (1.

0% yield) pays a dividend. AMWD, CPRI, MHK do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Tapestry, Inc.

(TPR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (1. 0% yield, +256. 5% 10Y return). Capri Holdings Limited (CPRI) carries a higher beta of 2. 03 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TPR: +256. 5%, CPRI: -63. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: AMWD is a small-cap deep-value stock; CPRI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TPR is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; MHK is a small-cap deep-value stock. TPR pays a dividend while AMWD, CPRI, MHK do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.