Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
AMWD vs JELD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Construction
AMWD vs JELD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances | Construction |
| Market Cap | $576M | $146M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.52B | $3.16B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $18M | $-508M |
| Gross Margin | 15.3% | 15.7% |
| Operating Margin | 1.9% | -8.6% |
| Forward P/E | 16.1x | — |
| Total Debt | $510M | $1.49B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $48M | $136M |
AMWD vs JELD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| American Woodmark C… (AMWD) | 100 | 63.0 | -37.0% |
| JELD-WEN Holding, I… (JELD) | 100 | 12.4 | -87.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AMWD vs JELD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AMWD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.49
- Rev growth -7.5%, EPS growth -9.1%, 3Y rev CAGR -2.7%
- -47.1% 10Y total return vs JELD's -93.5%
In this particular matchup, JELD is outpaced on most metrics by others in the set.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -7.5% revenue growth vs JELD's -14.9% | |
| Quality / Margins | 1.2% margin vs JELD's -16.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.49 vs JELD's 2.74, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | -30.3% vs JELD's -58.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 1.2% ROA vs JELD's -22.8%, ROIC 7.8% vs -1.9% |
AMWD vs JELD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — AMWD and JELD each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JELD is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.2B annually — 2.1x AMWD's $1.5B. AMWD is the more profitable business, keeping 1.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to JELD's -16.1%. On growth, JELD holds the edge at -6.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.5B | $3.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $92M | -$158M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $18M | -$508M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $64M | -$126M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +15.3% | +15.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +1.9% | -8.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +1.2% | -16.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +4.2% | -4.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -18.4% | -6.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.3% | +59.8% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — AMWD and JELD each lead in 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, AMWD's 5.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than JELD's 20.8x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $576M | $146M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.0B | $1.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 6.08x | -0.23x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 16.13x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.76x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 5.31x | 20.79x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.34x | 0.05x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.66x | 1.53x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 8.77x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
AMWD leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AMWD delivers a 1.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $2 in annual profit, vs $-3 for JELD. AMWD carries lower financial leverage with a 0.56x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JELD's 15.81x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AMWD scores 4/9 vs JELD's 2/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +1.9% | -2.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.2% | -22.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.8% | -1.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +10.1% | -2.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.56x | 15.81x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $462M | $1.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $48M | $136M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $510M | $1.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 4.75x | -4.11x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AMWD leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AMWD five years ago would be worth $3,788 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $547 for JELD. Over the past 12 months, AMWD leads with a -30.3% total return vs JELD's -58.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AMWD at -8.0% vs JELD's -48.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -28.1% | -31.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -30.3% | -58.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -22.1% | -86.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -62.1% | -94.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -47.1% | -93.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -8.0% | -48.8% |
Risk & Volatility
AMWD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AMWD is the less volatile stock with a 1.49 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than JELD's 2.74 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AMWD currently trades 54.8% from its 52-week high vs JELD's 24.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.49x | 2.74x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $72.16 | $6.98 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $35.53 | $0.93 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +54.8% | +24.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 36.6 | 64.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 231K | 2.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates AMWD as "Hold" and JELD as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 64.5% upside for JELD (target: $3) vs 18.9% for AMWD (target: $47).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $47.00 | $2.78 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 10 | 27 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +4.8% | 0.0% |
AMWD leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Profitability & Efficiency and Total Returns. 2 categories are tied.
AMWD vs JELD: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AMWD or JELD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, American Woodmark Corporation (AMWD) is the stronger pick with -7.
5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -14. 9% for JELD-WEN Holding, Inc. (JELD). American Woodmark Corporation (AMWD) offers the better valuation at 6. 1x trailing P/E (16. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate American Woodmark Corporation (AMWD) a "Hold" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — AMWD or JELD?
Over the past 5 years, American Woodmark Corporation (AMWD) delivered a total return of -62.
1%, compared to -94. 5% for JELD-WEN Holding, Inc. (JELD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AMWD returned -47. 1% versus JELD's -93. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — AMWD or JELD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), American Woodmark Corporation (AMWD) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
49β versus JELD-WEN Holding, Inc. 's 2. 74β — meaning JELD is approximately 84% more volatile than AMWD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, American Woodmark Corporation (AMWD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 56% versus 16% for JELD-WEN Holding, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — AMWD or JELD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), American Woodmark Corporation (AMWD) is pulling ahead at -7.
5% versus -14. 9% for JELD-WEN Holding, Inc. (JELD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: American Woodmark Corporation grew EPS -9. 1% year-over-year, compared to -226. 6% for JELD-WEN Holding, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, AMWD leads at -2. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — AMWD or JELD?
American Woodmark Corporation (AMWD) is the more profitable company, earning 5.
8% net margin versus -19. 3% for JELD-WEN Holding, Inc. — meaning it keeps 5. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AMWD leads at 8. 2% versus -1. 3% for JELD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AMWD leads at 17. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is AMWD or JELD more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for JELD: 64.
5% to $2. 78.
07Which pays a better dividend — AMWD or JELD?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is AMWD or JELD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, American Woodmark Corporation (AMWD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding.
JELD-WEN Holding, Inc. (JELD) carries a higher beta of 2. 74 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (AMWD: -47. 1%, JELD: -93. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between AMWD and JELD?
These companies operate in different sectors (AMWD (Consumer Cyclical) and JELD (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: AMWD is a small-cap deep-value stock; JELD is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.