Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
AMWD vs MHK vs MAS vs TREX vs CPRI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances
Construction
Construction
Luxury Goods
AMWD vs MHK vs MAS vs TREX vs CPRI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances | Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances | Construction | Construction | Luxury Goods |
| Market Cap | $576M | $6.29B | $14.51B | $4.12B | $2.23B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.52B | $10.99B | $7.68B | $1.18B | $3.71B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $18M | $414M | $837M | $191M | $-504M |
| Gross Margin | 15.3% | 24.3% | 35.4% | 39.2% | 61.4% |
| Operating Margin | 1.9% | 4.9% | 16.8% | 22.1% | -1.8% |
| Forward P/E | 16.1x | 11.2x | 16.9x | 24.0x | 13.4x |
| Total Debt | $510M | $2.76B | $3.44B | $229M | $3.10B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $48M | $856M | $647M | $4M | $166M |
AMWD vs MHK vs MAS vs TREX vs CPRI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| American Woodmark C… (AMWD) | 100 | 63.0 | -37.0% |
| Mohawk Industries, … (MHK) | 100 | 110.2 | +10.2% |
| Masco Corporation (MAS) | 100 | 154.2 | +54.2% |
| Trex Company, Inc. (TREX) | 100 | 65.2 | -34.8% |
| Capri Holdings Limi… (CPRI) | 100 | 124.3 | +24.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AMWD vs MHK vs MAS vs TREX vs CPRI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AMWD ranks third and is worth considering specifically for valuation efficiency.
- PEG 2.01 vs TREX's 7.16
- Better valuation composite
MHK is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.34, Low D/E 33.0%, current ratio 2.19x
- Beta 1.34, current ratio 2.19x
MAS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 1.28, yield 1.7%
- 152.1% 10Y total return vs TREX's 239.9%
- Beta 1.28 vs CPRI's 2.03
- 1.7% yield; 12-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
TREX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 2.0%, EPS growth -14.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 2.0%
- 2.0% revenue growth vs CPRI's -7.7%
- 16.3% margin vs CPRI's -13.6%
Among these 5 stocks, CPRI doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 2.0% revenue growth vs CPRI's -7.7% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 16.3% margin vs CPRI's -13.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.28 vs CPRI's 2.03 | |
| Dividends | 1.7% yield; 12-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +21.1% vs TREX's -30.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 15.9% ROA vs CPRI's -15.1%, ROIC 35.4% vs -13.6% |
AMWD vs MHK vs MAS vs TREX vs CPRI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
AMWD vs MHK vs MAS vs TREX vs CPRI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MAS leads in 4 of 6 categories
TREX leads 1 • AMWD leads 1 • MHK leads 0 • CPRI leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TREX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MHK is the larger business by revenue, generating $11.0B annually — 9.3x TREX's $1.2B. TREX is the more profitable business, keeping 16.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CPRI's -13.6%. On growth, MHK holds the edge at +8.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.5B | $11.0B | $7.7B | $1.2B | $3.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $92M | $1.2B | $1.4B | $309M | $72M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $18M | $414M | $837M | $191M | -$504M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $64M | $709M | $943M | $263M | $491M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +15.3% | +24.3% | +35.4% | +39.2% | +61.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +1.9% | +4.9% | +16.8% | +22.1% | -1.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +1.2% | +3.8% | +10.9% | +16.3% | -13.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +4.2% | +6.5% | +12.3% | +22.3% | +13.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -18.4% | +8.0% | +6.5% | +1.0% | -18.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.3% | +65.2% | +20.7% | +3.6% | +120.8% |
Valuation Metrics
AMWD leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 6.1x trailing earnings, AMWD trades at a 72% valuation discount to TREX's 22.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), AMWD offers better value at 0.76x vs TREX's 6.58x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $576M | $6.3B | $14.5B | $4.1B | $2.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.0B | $8.2B | $17.3B | $4.3B | $5.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 6.08x | 17.33x | 18.63x | 22.00x | -1.87x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 16.13x | 11.23x | 16.85x | 23.95x | 13.36x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.76x | — | 3.76x | 6.58x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 5.31x | 7.05x | 12.18x | 13.53x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.34x | 0.58x | 1.92x | 3.51x | 0.50x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.66x | 0.77x | 201.40x | 4.05x | 5.94x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 8.77x | 10.20x | 16.76x | 30.60x | 14.55x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MAS leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MAS delivers a 8.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $8 in annual profit, vs $-5 for CPRI. TREX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.22x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MAS's 45.81x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MHK scores 6/9 vs CPRI's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +1.9% | +5.0% | +8.0% | +18.8% | -4.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.2% | +3.0% | +15.9% | +12.3% | -15.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.8% | +3.9% | +35.4% | +16.4% | -13.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +10.1% | +4.8% | +35.9% | +23.2% | -17.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.56x | 0.33x | 45.81x | 0.22x | 8.34x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $462M | $1.9B | $2.8B | $225M | $2.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $48M | $856M | $647M | $4M | $166M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $510M | $2.8B | $3.4B | $229M | $3.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 4.75x | 36.90x | 12.60x | — | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MAS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MAS five years ago would be worth $11,609 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,141 for CPRI. Over the past 12 months, MAS leads with a +21.1% total return vs TREX's -30.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MAS at 11.9% vs CPRI's -20.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -28.1% | -6.2% | +12.1% | +9.3% | -23.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -30.3% | +1.9% | +21.1% | -30.8% | +18.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -22.1% | +2.9% | +40.1% | -30.4% | -50.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -62.1% | -55.3% | +16.1% | -64.0% | -68.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -47.1% | -47.6% | +152.1% | +239.9% | -63.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -8.0% | +0.9% | +11.9% | -11.4% | -20.9% |
Risk & Volatility
MAS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MAS is the less volatile stock with a 1.28 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CPRI's 2.03 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MAS currently trades 90.8% from its 52-week high vs AMWD's 54.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.49x | 1.34x | 1.28x | 1.47x | 2.03x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $72.16 | $143.13 | $79.19 | $68.78 | $28.27 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $35.53 | $93.60 | $58.16 | $29.77 | $15.37 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +54.8% | +71.8% | +90.8% | +56.9% | +66.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 36.6 | 50.6 | 59.6 | 51.3 | 47.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 231K | 1.1M | 2.7M | 1.7M | 2.5M |
Analyst Outlook
MAS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: AMWD as "Hold", MHK as "Hold", MAS as "Buy", TREX as "Hold", CPRI as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 35.5% upside for CPRI (target: $25) vs 13.6% for TREX (target: $45). MAS is the only dividend payer here at 1.73% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Buy | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $47.00 | $130.00 | $82.36 | $44.50 | $25.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 10 | 32 | 38 | 31 | 53 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +1.7% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 12 | 2 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $1.24 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +4.8% | +2.4% | +3.9% | +1.3% | +0.2% |
MAS leads in 4 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). TREX leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow).
AMWD vs MHK vs MAS vs TREX vs CPRI: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AMWD or MHK or MAS or TREX or CPRI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Trex Company, Inc.
(TREX) is the stronger pick with 2. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -7. 5% for American Woodmark Corporation (AMWD). American Woodmark Corporation (AMWD) offers the better valuation at 6. 1x trailing P/E (16. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Masco Corporation (MAS) a "Buy" — based on 38 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AMWD or MHK or MAS or TREX or CPRI?
On trailing P/E, American Woodmark Corporation (AMWD) is the cheapest at 6.
1x versus Trex Company, Inc. at 22. 0x. On forward P/E, Mohawk Industries, Inc. is actually cheaper at 11. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: American Woodmark Corporation wins at 2. 01x versus Trex Company, Inc. 's 7. 16x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AMWD or MHK or MAS or TREX or CPRI?
Over the past 5 years, Masco Corporation (MAS) delivered a total return of +16.
1%, compared to -68. 6% for Capri Holdings Limited (CPRI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TREX returned +239. 9% versus CPRI's -63. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AMWD or MHK or MAS or TREX or CPRI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Masco Corporation (MAS) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
28β versus Capri Holdings Limited's 2. 03β — meaning CPRI is approximately 58% more volatile than MAS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Trex Company, Inc. (TREX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 22% versus 46% for Masco Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AMWD or MHK or MAS or TREX or CPRI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Trex Company, Inc.
(TREX) is pulling ahead at 2. 0% versus -7. 5% for American Woodmark Corporation (AMWD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Masco Corporation grew EPS 2. 7% year-over-year, compared to -27. 1% for Mohawk Industries, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TREX leads at 2. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AMWD or MHK or MAS or TREX or CPRI?
Trex Company, Inc.
(TREX) is the more profitable company, earning 16. 2% net margin versus -26. 6% for Capri Holdings Limited — meaning it keeps 16. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TREX leads at 22. 0% versus -16. 9% for CPRI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CPRI leads at 63. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AMWD or MHK or MAS or TREX or CPRI more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, American Woodmark Corporation (AMWD) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 2. 01x versus Trex Company, Inc. 's 7. 16x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Mohawk Industries, Inc. (MHK) trades at 11. 2x forward P/E versus 24. 0x for Trex Company, Inc. — 12. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CPRI: 35. 5% to $25. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — AMWD or MHK or MAS or TREX or CPRI?
In this comparison, MAS (1.
7% yield) pays a dividend. AMWD, MHK, TREX, CPRI do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is AMWD or MHK or MAS or TREX or CPRI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Masco Corporation (MAS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.
28), 1. 7% yield, +152. 1% 10Y return). Capri Holdings Limited (CPRI) carries a higher beta of 2. 03 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MAS: +152. 1%, CPRI: -63. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AMWD and MHK and MAS and TREX and CPRI?
These companies operate in different sectors (AMWD (Consumer Cyclical) and MHK (Consumer Cyclical) and MAS (Industrials) and TREX (Industrials) and CPRI (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: AMWD is a small-cap deep-value stock; MHK is a small-cap deep-value stock; MAS is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; TREX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CPRI is a small-cap quality compounder stock. MAS pays a dividend while AMWD, MHK, TREX, CPRI do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.