Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
AMWD vs TREX vs MHK vs CPRI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Construction
Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances
Luxury Goods
AMWD vs TREX vs MHK vs CPRI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances | Construction | Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances | Luxury Goods |
| Market Cap | $603M | $4.00B | $5.96B | $2.22B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.52B | $1.17B | $10.99B | $3.71B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $18M | $190M | $414M | $-504M |
| Gross Margin | 15.3% | 39.2% | 24.3% | 61.4% |
| Operating Margin | 1.9% | 22.0% | 4.9% | -1.8% |
| Forward P/E | 16.9x | 23.0x | 10.6x | 13.3x |
| Total Debt | $510M | $229M | $2.76B | $3.10B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $48M | $4M | $856M | $166M |
AMWD vs TREX vs MHK vs CPRI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| American Woodmark C… (AMWD) | 100 | 65.9 | -34.1% |
| Trex Company, Inc. (TREX) | 100 | 62.6 | -37.4% |
| Mohawk Industries, … (MHK) | 100 | 104.5 | +4.5% |
| Capri Holdings Limi… (CPRI) | 100 | 123.6 | +23.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AMWD vs TREX vs MHK vs CPRI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AMWD is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if valuation efficiency is your priority.
- PEG 2.11 vs TREX's 6.87
- Better valuation composite
TREX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.47
- Rev growth 2.0%, EPS growth -14.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 2.0%
- 222.2% 10Y total return vs AMWD's -43.4%
- 2.0% revenue growth vs CPRI's -7.7%
MHK is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.34, Low D/E 33.0%, current ratio 2.19x
- Beta 1.34, current ratio 2.19x
- Beta 1.34 vs CPRI's 2.03, lower leverage
CPRI is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +20.7% vs TREX's -37.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 2.0% revenue growth vs CPRI's -7.7% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 16.2% margin vs CPRI's -13.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.34 vs CPRI's 2.03, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +20.7% vs TREX's -37.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 12.4% ROA vs CPRI's -15.1%, ROIC 16.4% vs -13.6% |
AMWD vs TREX vs MHK vs CPRI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
AMWD vs TREX vs MHK vs CPRI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
TREX leads in 2 of 6 categories
MHK leads 2 • CPRI leads 1 • AMWD leads 1
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CPRI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MHK is the larger business by revenue, generating $11.0B annually — 9.4x TREX's $1.2B. TREX is the more profitable business, keeping 16.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CPRI's -13.6%. On growth, MHK holds the edge at +8.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.5B | $1.2B | $11.0B | $3.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $92M | $321M | $1.2B | $72M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $18M | $190M | $414M | -$504M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $64M | $147M | $709M | $491M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +15.3% | +39.2% | +24.3% | +61.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +1.9% | +22.0% | +4.9% | -1.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +1.2% | +16.2% | +3.8% | -13.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +4.2% | +12.5% | +6.5% | +13.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -18.4% | -3.9% | +8.0% | -18.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.3% | -77.8% | +65.2% | +120.8% |
Valuation Metrics
AMWD leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 6.4x trailing earnings, AMWD trades at a 70% valuation discount to TREX's 21.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), AMWD offers better value at 0.79x vs TREX's 6.31x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $603M | $4.0B | $6.0B | $2.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.1B | $4.2B | $7.9B | $5.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 6.36x | 21.12x | 16.42x | -1.86x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 16.88x | 22.99x | 10.64x | 13.30x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.79x | 6.31x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 5.45x | 13.17x | 6.77x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.35x | 3.41x | 0.55x | 0.50x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.69x | 3.89x | 0.73x | 5.91x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 9.17x | 29.75x | 9.67x | 14.48x |
Profitability & Efficiency
TREX leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TREX delivers a 19.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $19 in annual profit, vs $-5 for CPRI. TREX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.22x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CPRI's 8.34x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TREX scores 6/9 vs CPRI's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +1.9% | +19.2% | +5.0% | -4.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.2% | +12.4% | +3.0% | -15.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.8% | +16.4% | +3.9% | -13.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +10.1% | +23.2% | +4.8% | -17.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 | 6 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.56x | 0.22x | 0.33x | 8.34x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $462M | $225M | $1.9B | $2.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $48M | $4M | $856M | $166M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $510M | $229M | $2.8B | $3.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 4.75x | 3394.21x | 36.90x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MHK leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MHK five years ago would be worth $4,342 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,166 for CPRI. Over the past 12 months, CPRI leads with a +20.7% total return vs TREX's -37.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MHK at -1.0% vs CPRI's -21.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -24.8% | +4.9% | -11.1% | -23.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -30.6% | -37.4% | -4.0% | +20.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -17.8% | -31.9% | -2.8% | -51.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -58.2% | -65.1% | -56.6% | -68.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -43.4% | +222.2% | -49.7% | -62.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -6.3% | -12.0% | -1.0% | -21.4% |
Risk & Volatility
MHK leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MHK is the less volatile stock with a 1.34 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CPRI's 2.03 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MHK currently trades 68.0% from its 52-week high vs TREX's 54.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.49x | 1.47x | 1.34x | 2.03x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $72.16 | $68.78 | $143.13 | $28.27 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $35.53 | $29.77 | $93.60 | $15.05 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +57.3% | +54.7% | +68.0% | +65.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 38.6 | 36.4 | 33.3 | 39.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 211K | 1.8M | 1.0M | 2.6M |
Analyst Outlook
TREX leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: AMWD as "Hold", TREX as "Hold", MHK as "Hold", CPRI as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 36.2% upside for CPRI (target: $25) vs 13.6% for AMWD (target: $47).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $47.00 | $44.50 | $130.00 | $25.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 10 | 31 | 32 | 53 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 2 | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +4.6% | +1.4% | +2.5% | +0.2% |
TREX leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Analyst Outlook). MHK leads in 2 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility).
AMWD vs TREX vs MHK vs CPRI: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AMWD or TREX or MHK or CPRI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Trex Company, Inc.
(TREX) is the stronger pick with 2. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -7. 5% for American Woodmark Corporation (AMWD). American Woodmark Corporation (AMWD) offers the better valuation at 6. 4x trailing P/E (16. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate American Woodmark Corporation (AMWD) a "Hold" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AMWD or TREX or MHK or CPRI?
On trailing P/E, American Woodmark Corporation (AMWD) is the cheapest at 6.
4x versus Trex Company, Inc. at 21. 1x. On forward P/E, Mohawk Industries, Inc. is actually cheaper at 10. 6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: American Woodmark Corporation wins at 2. 11x versus Trex Company, Inc. 's 6. 87x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AMWD or TREX or MHK or CPRI?
Over the past 5 years, Mohawk Industries, Inc.
(MHK) delivered a total return of -56. 6%, compared to -68. 3% for Capri Holdings Limited (CPRI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TREX returned +222. 2% versus CPRI's -62. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AMWD or TREX or MHK or CPRI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Mohawk Industries, Inc.
(MHK) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 34β versus Capri Holdings Limited's 2. 03β — meaning CPRI is approximately 52% more volatile than MHK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Trex Company, Inc. (TREX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 22% versus 8% for Capri Holdings Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AMWD or TREX or MHK or CPRI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Trex Company, Inc.
(TREX) is pulling ahead at 2. 0% versus -7. 5% for American Woodmark Corporation (AMWD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Capri Holdings Limited grew EPS 0. 0% year-over-year, compared to -27. 1% for Mohawk Industries, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TREX leads at 2. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AMWD or TREX or MHK or CPRI?
Trex Company, Inc.
(TREX) is the more profitable company, earning 16. 2% net margin versus -26. 6% for Capri Holdings Limited — meaning it keeps 16. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TREX leads at 22. 0% versus -16. 9% for CPRI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CPRI leads at 63. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AMWD or TREX or MHK or CPRI more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, American Woodmark Corporation (AMWD) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 2. 11x versus Trex Company, Inc. 's 6. 87x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Mohawk Industries, Inc. (MHK) trades at 10. 6x forward P/E versus 23. 0x for Trex Company, Inc. — 12. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CPRI: 36. 2% to $25. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — AMWD or TREX or MHK or CPRI?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is AMWD or TREX or MHK or CPRI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Trex Company, Inc.
(TREX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+222. 2% 10Y return). Capri Holdings Limited (CPRI) carries a higher beta of 2. 03 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TREX: +222. 2%, CPRI: -62. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AMWD and TREX and MHK and CPRI?
These companies operate in different sectors (AMWD (Consumer Cyclical) and TREX (Industrials) and MHK (Consumer Cyclical) and CPRI (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: AMWD is a small-cap deep-value stock; TREX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MHK is a small-cap deep-value stock; CPRI is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.