Telecommunications Services
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
AMX vs TU
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Telecommunications Services
AMX vs TU — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Telecommunications Services | Telecommunications Services |
| Market Cap | $81.54B | $20.01B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $939.71B | $20.51B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $82.51B | $1.11B |
| Gross Margin | 42.9% | 53.7% |
| Operating Margin | 20.5% | 11.5% |
| Forward P/E | 0.8x | 19.5x |
| Total Debt | $918.75B | $31.46B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $35.01B | $2.62B |
AMX vs TU — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| América Móvil, S.A.… (AMX) | 100 | 204.4 | +104.4% |
| TELUS Corporation (TU) | 100 | 73.8 | -26.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AMX vs TU
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AMX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 1.8%, EPS growth 248.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 1.6%
- 312.6% 10Y total return vs TU's 45.5%
- 1.8% revenue growth vs TU's 1.8%
TU is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 0.11, yield 6.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.11, current ratio 0.86x
- Beta 0.11, yield 6.1%, current ratio 0.86x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 1.8% revenue growth vs TU's 1.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (0.8x vs 19.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 8.8% margin vs TU's 5.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.11 vs AMX's 0.50, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 6.1% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs AMX's 2.2% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +60.7% vs TU's -8.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.5% ROA vs TU's 1.9%, ROIC 11.2% vs 3.9% |
AMX vs TU — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMX is the larger business by revenue, generating $939.7B annually — 45.8x TU's $20.5B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 8.8% (AMX) to 5.4% (TU). On growth, TU holds the edge at +1.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $939.7B | $20.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $372.8B | $7.6B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $82.5B | $1.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $173.3B | $1.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +42.9% | +53.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +20.5% | +11.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +8.8% | +5.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +18.4% | +8.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.1% | +1.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +98.1% | -25.0% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — AMX and TU each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 18.2x trailing earnings, AMX trades at a 25% valuation discount to TU's 24.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, AMX's 6.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than TU's 8.7x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $81.5B | $20.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $132.6B | $41.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 18.18x | 24.19x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 0.81x | 19.51x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.93x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 6.46x | 8.72x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.59x | 1.33x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.31x | 1.61x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 11.69x | 11.57x |
Profitability & Efficiency
AMX leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AMX delivers a 18.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $19 in annual profit, vs $7 for TU. TU carries lower financial leverage with a 1.90x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AMX's 2.14x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AMX scores 7/9 vs TU's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +18.6% | +6.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.5% | +1.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +11.2% | +3.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +14.3% | +4.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.14x | 1.90x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $883.7B | $28.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $35.0B | $2.6B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $918.8B | $31.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.54x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AMX leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AMX five years ago would be worth $35,877 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,536 for TU. Over the past 12 months, AMX leads with a +60.7% total return vs TU's -8.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AMX at 11.0% vs TU's -7.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +31.1% | +0.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +60.7% | -8.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +36.9% | -21.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +258.8% | -14.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +312.6% | +45.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +11.0% | -7.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — AMX and TU each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TU is the less volatile stock with a 0.11 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AMX's 0.50 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AMX currently trades 97.8% from its 52-week high vs TU's 76.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.50x | 0.11x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $27.70 | $16.74 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $16.60 | $11.69 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +97.8% | +76.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 63.4 | 51.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.8M | 5.3M |
Analyst Outlook
TU leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates AMX as "Buy" and TU as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 76.2% upside for TU (target: $23) vs -1.3% for AMX (target: $27). For income investors, TU offers the higher dividend yield at 6.09% vs AMX's 2.19%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $26.75 | $22.59 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 24 | 23 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.2% | +6.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 5 | 5 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $10.29 | $1.06 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.8% | +0.1% |
AMX leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). TU leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook). 2 tied.
AMX vs TU: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AMX or TU a better buy right now?
For growth investors, América Móvil, S.
A. B. de C. V. (AMX) is the stronger pick with 1. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 8% for TELUS Corporation (TU). América Móvil, S. A. B. de C. V. (AMX) offers the better valuation at 18. 2x trailing P/E (0. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate América Móvil, S. A. B. de C. V. (AMX) a "Buy" — based on 24 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AMX or TU?
On trailing P/E, América Móvil, S.
A. B. de C. V. (AMX) is the cheapest at 18. 2x versus TELUS Corporation at 24. 2x. On forward P/E, América Móvil, S. A. B. de C. V. is actually cheaper at 0. 8x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AMX or TU?
Over the past 5 years, América Móvil, S.
A. B. de C. V. (AMX) delivered a total return of +258. 8%, compared to -14. 6% for TELUS Corporation (TU). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AMX returned +312. 6% versus TU's +45. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AMX or TU?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), TELUS Corporation (TU) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
11β versus América Móvil, S. A. B. de C. V. 's 0. 50β — meaning AMX is approximately 367% more volatile than TU relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, TELUS Corporation (TU) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 190% versus 2% for América Móvil, S. A. B. de C. V. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AMX or TU?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), América Móvil, S.
A. B. de C. V. (AMX) is pulling ahead at 1. 8% versus 1. 8% for TELUS Corporation (TU). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: América Móvil, S. A. B. de C. V. grew EPS 248. 6% year-over-year, compared to 7. 5% for TELUS Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, TU leads at 3. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AMX or TU?
América Móvil, S.
A. B. de C. V. (AMX) is the more profitable company, earning 8. 8% net margin versus 5. 4% for TELUS Corporation — meaning it keeps 8. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AMX leads at 21. 0% versus 11. 5% for TU. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AMX leads at 42. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AMX or TU more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, América Móvil, S.
A. B. de C. V. (AMX) trades at 0. 8x forward P/E versus 19. 5x for TELUS Corporation — 18. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TU: 76. 2% to $22. 59.
08Which pays a better dividend — AMX or TU?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
TELUS Corporation (TU) offers the highest yield at 6. 1%, versus 2. 2% for América Móvil, S. A. B. de C. V. (AMX).
09Is AMX or TU better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, TELUS Corporation (TU) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
11), 6. 1% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (TU: +45. 5%, AMX: +312. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AMX and TU?
Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: AMX is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; TU is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.