AMZE vs SPWH

For growth investors, Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings, Inc.

(SPWH) is the stronger pick with -7. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -83. 6% for Amaze Holdings, Inc. (AMZE). The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

Over the past 5 years, Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings, Inc.

(SPWH) delivered a total return of -91. 9%, compared to -99. 0% for Amaze Holdings, Inc. (AMZE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SPWH returned -87. 2% versus AMZE's -99. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings, Inc.

(SPWH) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 80β versus Amaze Holdings, Inc. 's 2. 98β — meaning AMZE is approximately 65% more volatile than SPWH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Amaze Holdings, Inc. (AMZE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 29% versus 193% for Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings, Inc.

(SPWH) is pulling ahead at -7. 0% versus -83. 6% for Amaze Holdings, Inc. (AMZE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Amaze Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 75. 7% year-over-year, compared to -13. 0% for Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SPWH leads at -7. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings, Inc.

(SPWH) is the more profitable company, earning -2. 8% net margin versus -842. 3% for Amaze Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps -2. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SPWH leads at -1. 5% versus -1044. 9% for AMZE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SPWH leads at 30. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings, Inc.

(SPWH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. Amaze Holdings, Inc. (AMZE) carries a higher beta of 2. 98 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SPWH: -87. 2%, AMZE: -99. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (AMZE (Technology) and SPWH (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.