Food Distribution
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
ANDE vs GPRE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Chemicals - Specialty
ANDE vs GPRE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Food Distribution | Chemicals - Specialty |
| Market Cap | $2.32B | $1.19B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $10.98B | $2.09B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $129M | $-121M |
| Gross Margin | 6.6% | 1.8% |
| Operating Margin | 1.1% | -4.0% |
| Forward P/E | 14.0x | 48.1x |
| Total Debt | $1.04B | $508M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $98M | $230M |
ANDE vs GPRE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| The Andersons, Inc. (ANDE) | 100 | 526.5 | +426.5% |
| Green Plains Inc. (GPRE) | 100 | 198.5 | +98.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ANDE vs GPRE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ANDE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 23 yrs, beta 0.55, yield 1.2%
- Rev growth -2.2%, EPS growth -15.7%, 3Y rev CAGR -14.0%
- 156.6% 10Y total return vs GPRE's 17.1%
GPRE is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +363.7% vs ANDE's +97.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -2.2% revenue growth vs GPRE's -14.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (14.0x vs 48.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 1.2% margin vs GPRE's -5.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.55 vs GPRE's 1.22 | |
| Dividends | 1.2% yield; 23-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +363.7% vs ANDE's +97.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.6% ROA vs GPRE's -7.7%, ROIC 4.6% vs -5.3% |
ANDE vs GPRE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
ANDE vs GPRE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ANDE leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ANDE is the larger business by revenue, generating $11.0B annually — 5.2x GPRE's $2.1B. ANDE is the more profitable business, keeping 1.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GPRE's -5.8%. On growth, ANDE holds the edge at -1.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $11.0B | $2.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $218M | $14M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $129M | -$121M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$105M | $74M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +6.6% | +1.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +1.1% | -4.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +1.2% | -5.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -1.0% | +3.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -1.2% | -26.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +96.0% | +119.8% |
Valuation Metrics
ANDE leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, ANDE's 12.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than GPRE's 103.0x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.3B | $1.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.3B | $1.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 24.37x | -9.43x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 13.97x | 48.06x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.38x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 12.49x | 102.96x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.21x | 0.57x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.81x | 1.48x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 16.09x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ANDE leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ANDE delivers a 9.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $9 in annual profit, vs $-16 for GPRE. GPRE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.66x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ANDE's 0.81x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ANDE scores 6/9 vs GPRE's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.5% | -15.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.6% | -7.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.6% | -5.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.8% | -6.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.81x | 0.66x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $945M | $278M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $98M | $230M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.0B | $508M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.91x | -0.88x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ANDE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ANDE five years ago would be worth $23,197 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,303 for GPRE. Over the past 12 months, GPRE leads with a +363.7% total return vs ANDE's +97.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ANDE at 23.9% vs GPRE's -18.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +29.4% | +65.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +97.5% | +363.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +90.0% | -45.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +132.0% | -47.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +156.6% | +17.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +23.9% | -18.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ANDE and GPRE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ANDE is the less volatile stock with a 0.55 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GPRE's 1.22 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GPRE currently trades 89.6% from its 52-week high vs ANDE's 83.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.55x | 1.22x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $82.11 | $18.94 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $31.03 | $3.39 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +83.1% | +89.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 70.2 | 68.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 323K | 1.4M |
Analyst Outlook
ANDE leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates ANDE as "Buy" and GPRE as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 9.9% upside for ANDE (target: $75) vs -18.7% for GPRE (target: $14). ANDE is the only dividend payer here at 1.15% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $75.00 | $13.80 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 20 | 20 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.2% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 23 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.79 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.7% | +2.5% |
ANDE leads in 5 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics. 1 category is tied.
ANDE vs GPRE: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ANDE or GPRE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, The Andersons, Inc.
(ANDE) is the stronger pick with -2. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -14. 9% for Green Plains Inc. (GPRE). The Andersons, Inc. (ANDE) offers the better valuation at 24. 4x trailing P/E (14. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Andersons, Inc. (ANDE) a "Buy" — based on 20 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ANDE or GPRE?
On forward P/E, The Andersons, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 14. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ANDE or GPRE?
Over the past 5 years, The Andersons, Inc.
(ANDE) delivered a total return of +132. 0%, compared to -47. 0% for Green Plains Inc. (GPRE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ANDE returned +156. 6% versus GPRE's +17. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ANDE or GPRE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Andersons, Inc.
(ANDE) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 55β versus Green Plains Inc. 's 1. 22β — meaning GPRE is approximately 122% more volatile than ANDE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Green Plains Inc. (GPRE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 66% versus 81% for The Andersons, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ANDE or GPRE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), The Andersons, Inc.
(ANDE) is pulling ahead at -2. 2% versus -14. 9% for Green Plains Inc. (GPRE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Andersons, Inc. grew EPS -15. 7% year-over-year, compared to -39. 5% for Green Plains Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ANDE leads at -14. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ANDE or GPRE?
The Andersons, Inc.
(ANDE) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 9% net margin versus -5. 8% for Green Plains Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ANDE leads at 1. 2% versus -4. 0% for GPRE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ANDE leads at 6. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ANDE or GPRE more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, The Andersons, Inc.
(ANDE) trades at 14. 0x forward P/E versus 48. 1x for Green Plains Inc. — 34. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ANDE: 9. 9% to $75. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — ANDE or GPRE?
In this comparison, ANDE (1.
2% yield) pays a dividend. GPRE does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ANDE or GPRE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Andersons, Inc.
(ANDE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 55), 1. 2% yield, +156. 6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ANDE: +156. 6%, GPRE: +17. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ANDE and GPRE?
These companies operate in different sectors (ANDE (Consumer Defensive) and GPRE (Basic Materials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
ANDE pays a dividend while GPRE does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.