Specialty Business Services
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
ANPA vs BTBT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Capital Markets
ANPA vs BTBT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Specialty Business Services | Financial - Capital Markets |
| Market Cap | $72M | $589M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $6M | $164M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $820K | $137M |
| Gross Margin | 43.5% | 61.9% |
| Operating Margin | 15.5% | 16.8% |
| Forward P/E | 87.2x | 9.2x |
| Total Debt | $1M | $14M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $320K | $95M |
Quick Verdict: ANPA vs BTBT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ANPA is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- beta 1.97
- 62.5% 10Y total return vs BTBT's -60.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.97, Low D/E 46.2%, current ratio 1.32x
BTBT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 264.6%, EPS growth 225.0%
- 264.6% NII/revenue growth vs ANPA's -6.1%
- Lower P/E (9.2x vs 87.2x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 264.6% NII/revenue growth vs ANPA's -6.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.2x vs 87.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 17.3% margin vs ANPA's 13.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.97 vs BTBT's 3.37 | |
| Dividends | 0.3% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +62.5% vs BTBT's -9.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 19.0% ROA vs ANPA's 14.9%, ROIC 6.5% vs 25.7% |
ANPA vs BTBT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
ANPA vs BTBT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BTBT leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BTBT is the larger business by revenue, generating $164M annually — 27.8x ANPA's $6M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 17.3% (BTBT) to 13.9% (ANPA).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $6M | $164M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | — | $166M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | — | $137M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | — | -$448M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +43.5% | +61.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +15.5% | +16.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +13.9% | +17.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +13.7% | -65.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +2.8% |
Valuation Metrics
BTBT leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.2x trailing earnings, BTBT trades at a 90% valuation discount to ANPA's 87.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, BTBT's 8.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ANPA's 47.0x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $72M | $589M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $72M | $508M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 87.20x | 9.15x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 47.00x | 8.49x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 12.15x | 3.60x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 28.05x | 0.56x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 88.94x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — ANPA and BTBT each lead in 4 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ANPA delivers a 38.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $39 in annual profit, vs $21 for BTBT. BTBT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ANPA's 0.46x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BTBT scores 6/9 vs ANPA's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +38.5% | +21.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +14.9% | +19.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +25.7% | +6.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +36.6% | +8.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.46x | 0.03x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $856,315 | -$81M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $320,161 | $95M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1M | $14M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 20.65x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ANPA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ANPA five years ago would be worth $16,250 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,543 for BTBT. Over the past 12 months, ANPA leads with a +62.5% total return vs BTBT's -9.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ANPA at 17.6% vs BTBT's -7.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -74.8% | -10.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +62.5% | -9.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +62.5% | -19.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +62.5% | -84.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +62.5% | -60.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +17.6% | -7.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ANPA and BTBT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ANPA is the less volatile stock with a 1.97 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BTBT's 3.37 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BTBT currently trades 40.2% from its 52-week high vs ANPA's 3.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.97x | 3.37x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $180.64 | $4.55 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.80 | $1.25 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +3.2% | +40.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 24.5 | 69.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 37K | 18.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
BTBT is the only dividend payer here at 0.31% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $5.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 2 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.01 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
BTBT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). ANPA leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
ANPA vs BTBT: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ANPA or BTBT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Bit Digital, Inc.
(BTBT) is the stronger pick with 264. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -6. 1% for Rich Sparkle Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares (ANPA). Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) offers the better valuation at 9. 2x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ANPA or BTBT?
On trailing P/E, Bit Digital, Inc.
(BTBT) is the cheapest at 9. 2x versus Rich Sparkle Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares at 87. 2x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ANPA or BTBT?
Over the past 5 years, Rich Sparkle Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares (ANPA) delivered a total return of +62.
5%, compared to -84. 6% for Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ANPA returned +62. 5% versus BTBT's -60. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ANPA or BTBT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Rich Sparkle Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares (ANPA) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
97β versus Bit Digital, Inc. 's 3. 37β — meaning BTBT is approximately 71% more volatile than ANPA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 46% for Rich Sparkle Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ANPA or BTBT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Bit Digital, Inc.
(BTBT) is pulling ahead at 264. 6% versus -6. 1% for Rich Sparkle Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares (ANPA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Bit Digital, Inc. grew EPS 225. 0% year-over-year, compared to 1. 7% for Rich Sparkle Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ANPA or BTBT?
Bit Digital, Inc.
(BTBT) is the more profitable company, earning 17. 3% net margin versus 13. 9% for Rich Sparkle Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares — meaning it keeps 17. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BTBT leads at 16. 8% versus 15. 5% for ANPA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BTBT leads at 61. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Which pays a better dividend — ANPA or BTBT?
In this comparison, BTBT (0.
3% yield) pays a dividend. ANPA does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is ANPA or BTBT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Rich Sparkle Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares (ANPA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding.
Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) carries a higher beta of 3. 37 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ANPA: +62. 5%, BTBT: -60. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between ANPA and BTBT?
These companies operate in different sectors (ANPA (Industrials) and BTBT (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: ANPA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BTBT is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.