Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
ANRO logo
ANRO
NRXP logo
NRXP
KO logo
KO
AXSM logo
AXSM
SAVA logo
SAVA
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

ANRO vs NRXP vs KO vs AXSM vs SAVA

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
ANRO
Alto Neuroscience, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNYSE • US
Market Cap$753M
5Y Perf.+39.4%
NRXP
NRx Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$66M
5Y Perf.+7.0%
KO
The Coca-Cola Company

Beverages - Non-Alcoholic

Consumer DefensiveNYSE • US
Market Cap$355.61B
5Y Perf.+37.7%
AXSM
Axsome Therapeutics, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$13.13B
5Y Perf.+213.6%
SAVA
Cassava Sciences, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$64M
5Y Perf.-30.5%

ANRO vs NRXP vs KO vs AXSM vs SAVA — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
ANRO logoANRO
NRXP logoNRXP
KO logoKO
AXSM logoAXSM
SAVA logoSAVA
IndustryBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBeverages - Non-AlcoholicBiotechnologyBiotechnology
Market Cap$753M$66M$355.61B$13.13B$64M
Revenue (TTM)$0.00$2M$49.28B$708M$0.00
Net Income (TTM)$-74M$-25M$13.70B$-188M$-106M
Gross Margin37.1%61.7%92.6%
Operating Margin-7.5%29.3%-24.8%
Forward P/E25.3x
Total Debt$4M$631K$45.49B$241M$0.00
Cash & Equiv.$176M$8M$10.27B$323M$129M

ANRO vs NRXP vs KO vs AXSM vs SAVALong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

ANRO
NRXP
KO
AXSM
SAVA
StockFeb 24Jun 26Return
Alto Neuroscience, … (ANRO)100139.4+39.4%
NRx Pharmaceuticals… (NRXP)100107.0+7.0%
The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO)100137.7+37.7%
Axsome Therapeutics… (AXSM)100313.6+213.6%
Cassava Sciences, I… (SAVA)10069.5-30.5%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: ANRO vs NRXP vs KO vs AXSM vs SAVA

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: KO leads in 3 of 6 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and dividend income and shareholder returns. Axsome Therapeutics, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and capital preservation and lower volatility. ANRO also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
🥇KO emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
ANRO
Alto Neuroscience, Inc.
The Momentum Pick

ANRO ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.

  • +7.8% vs SAVA's -37.7%
Best for: momentum
NRXP
NRx Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
The Healthcare Pick

NRXP lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: healthcare exposure
KO
The Coca-Cola Company
The Quality Compounder

KO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for quality and dividends.

  • 27.8% margin vs NRXP's -10.7%
  • 2.5% yield; 56-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
  • 13.1% ROA vs NRXP's -219.6%
Best for: quality and dividends
AXSM
Axsome Therapeutics, Inc.
The Growth Play

AXSM is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.

  • Rev growth 65.5%, EPS growth 38.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 133.7%
  • 35.5% 10Y total return vs KO's 121.1%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.63, current ratio 1.55x
  • Beta 0.63, current ratio 1.55x
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
SAVA
Cassava Sciences, Inc.
The Income Pick

SAVA is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.

  • Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.92
Best for: income & stability
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthAXSM logoAXSM65.5% revenue growth vs SAVA's -5.4%
Quality / MarginsKO logoKO27.8% margin vs NRXP's -10.7%
Stability / SafetyAXSM logoAXSMBeta 0.63 vs ANRO's 2.60
DividendsKO logoKO2.5% yield; 56-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)ANRO logoANRO+7.8% vs SAVA's -37.7%
Efficiency (ROA)KO logoKO13.1% ROA vs NRXP's -219.6%

ANRO vs NRXP vs KO vs AXSM vs SAVA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

Discover the Biotech & Healthcare Stocks Theme

These companies are key players in the Biotech & Healthcare Stocks ecosystem. See how they stack up against the rest of the sector.

Explore Theme
ANROAlto Neuroscience, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

NRXPNRx Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
FY 2025
Therapy
100.0%$854,000
KOThe Coca-Cola Company
FY 2025
Pacific
84.6%$31.6B
Bottling investments
15.4%$5.7B
AXSMAxsome Therapeutics, Inc.
FY 2025
Product
100.0%$634M
SAVACassava Sciences, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

ANRO vs NRXP vs KO vs AXSM vs SAVA — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLKOLAGGINGSAVA

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

KO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

KO and SAVA operate at a comparable scale, with $49.3B and $0 in trailing revenue. KO is the more profitable business, keeping 27.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NRXP's -10.7%. On growth, AXSM holds the edge at +57.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricANRO logoANROAlto Neuroscience…NRXP logoNRXPNRx Pharmaceutica…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…AXSM logoAXSMAxsome Therapeuti…SAVA logoSAVACassava Sciences,…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$0$2M$49.3B$708M$0
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$56M-$31M$15.5B-$167M-$110M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$74M-$25M$13.7B-$188M-$106M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$63M-$15M$12.6B-$71M-$84M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+37.1%+61.7%+92.6%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-7.5%+29.3%-24.8%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-10.7%+27.8%-26.6%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-6.5%+25.5%-10.0%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+12.1%+57.4%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-42.9%+87.0%+18.2%-3.3%+62.1%
KO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — KO and AXSM and SAVA each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.
MetricANRO logoANROAlto Neuroscience…NRXP logoNRXPNRx Pharmaceutica…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…AXSM logoAXSMAxsome Therapeuti…SAVA logoSAVACassava Sciences,…
Market CapShares × price$753M$66M$355.6B$13.1B$64M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$581M$59M$390.8B$13.0B-$65M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-9.80x-2.87x27.18x-69.34x-2.54x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.25.27x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate2.43x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple26.39x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue54.19x7.42x20.57x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share4.10x10.40x143.77x0.42x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF67.15x
Evenly matched — KO and AXSM and SAVA each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

KO leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $-3 for AXSM. ANRO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AXSM's 2.73x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KO scores 7/9 vs SAVA's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricANRO logoANROAlto Neuroscience…NRXP logoNRXPNRx Pharmaceutica…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…AXSM logoAXSMAxsome Therapeuti…SAVA logoSAVACassava Sciences,…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-47.2%+41.1%-2.6%-95.8%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-38.8%-2.2%+13.1%-27.8%-75.3%
ROICReturn on invested capital+15.8%-19.1%-6.3%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-38.9%+17.3%-52.1%-99.9%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–936742
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.03x1.33x2.73x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$172M-$7M$35.2B-$82M-$129M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$176M$8M$10.3B$323M$129M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$4M$631,000$45.5B$241M$0
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-30.35x-34.34x10.70x-34.13x
KO leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

AXSM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in AXSM five years ago would be worth $37,792 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $213 for NRXP. Over the past 12 months, ANRO leads with a +776.3% total return vs SAVA's -37.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AXSM at 50.5% vs SAVA's -27.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricANRO logoANROAlto Neuroscience…NRXP logoNRXPNRx Pharmaceutica…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…AXSM logoAXSMAxsome Therapeuti…SAVA logoSAVACassava Sciences,…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+29.4%+46.6%+20.3%+42.8%-36.8%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+776.3%+11.6%+17.2%+140.2%-37.7%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+3.7%-28.2%+47.0%+241.0%-62.5%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+3.7%-97.9%+65.6%+277.9%-87.8%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+3.7%-96.0%+121.1%+3550.5%-38.0%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+1.2%-10.5%+13.7%+50.5%-27.9%
AXSM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — KO and AXSM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ANRO's 2.60 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AXSM currently trades 98.9% from its 52-week high vs SAVA's 26.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricANRO logoANROAlto Neuroscience…NRXP logoNRXPNRx Pharmaceutica…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…AXSM logoAXSMAxsome Therapeuti…SAVA logoSAVACassava Sciences,…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5002.60x2.05x-0.20x0.63x1.92x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$28.44$5.05$84.04$257.93$4.98
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$2.15$1.62$65.35$96.09$1.27
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+75.5%+76.0%+98.3%+98.9%+26.5%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10051.355.160.673.642.7
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded316K1.3M12.7M690K134K
Evenly matched — KO and AXSM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

KO leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: ANRO as "Buy", KO as "Buy", AXSM as "Buy", SAVA as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 61.2% upside for ANRO (target: $35) vs 2.8% for AXSM (target: $262). KO is the only dividend payer here at 2.46% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricANRO logoANROAlto Neuroscience…NRXP logoNRXPNRx Pharmaceutica…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…AXSM logoAXSMAxsome Therapeuti…SAVA logoSAVACassava Sciences,…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$34.60$86.13$262.38
# AnalystsCovering analysts8482512
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+2.5%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises560
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$2.04
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+0.0%0.0%+0.2%0.0%0.0%
KO leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

KO leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). AXSM leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.

Best OverallThe Coca-Cola Company (KO)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

ANRO vs NRXP vs KO vs AXSM vs SAVA: Key Questions Answered

9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is ANRO or NRXP or KO or AXSM or SAVA a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Axsome Therapeutics, Inc.

(AXSM) is the stronger pick with 65. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 9% for The Coca-Cola Company (KO). The Coca-Cola Company (KO) offers the better valuation at 27. 2x trailing P/E (25. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Alto Neuroscience, Inc. (ANRO) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which is the better long-term investment — ANRO or NRXP or KO or AXSM or SAVA?

Over the past 5 years, Axsome Therapeutics, Inc.

(AXSM) delivered a total return of +277. 9%, compared to -97. 9% for NRx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (NRXP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AXSM returned +35. 5% versus NRXP's -96. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

03

Which is safer — ANRO or NRXP or KO or AXSM or SAVA?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.

20β versus Alto Neuroscience, Inc. 's 2. 60β — meaning ANRO is approximately -1400% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Alto Neuroscience, Inc. (ANRO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 3% for Axsome Therapeutics, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

04

Which is growing faster — ANRO or NRXP or KO or AXSM or SAVA?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Axsome Therapeutics, Inc.

(AXSM) is pulling ahead at 65. 5% versus 1. 9% for The Coca-Cola Company (KO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Cassava Sciences, Inc. grew EPS 77. 6% year-over-year, compared to 12. 4% for Alto Neuroscience, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, AXSM leads at 133. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

05

Which has better profit margins — ANRO or NRXP or KO or AXSM or SAVA?

The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the more profitable company, earning 27.

3% net margin versus -23. 4% for NRx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — meaning it keeps 27. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KO leads at 28. 7% versus -1324. 4% for NRXP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AXSM leads at 92. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

06

Is ANRO or NRXP or KO or AXSM or SAVA more undervalued right now?

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ANRO: 61.

2% to $34. 60.

07

Which pays a better dividend — ANRO or NRXP or KO or AXSM or SAVA?

In this comparison, KO (2.

5% yield) pays a dividend. ANRO, NRXP, AXSM, SAVA do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

08

Is ANRO or NRXP or KO or AXSM or SAVA better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.

20), 2. 5% yield, +121. 1% 10Y return). NRx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (NRXP) carries a higher beta of 2. 05 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +121. 1%, NRXP: -96. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

09

What are the main differences between ANRO and NRXP and KO and AXSM and SAVA?

These companies operate in different sectors (ANRO (Healthcare) and NRXP (Healthcare) and KO (Consumer Defensive) and AXSM (Healthcare) and SAVA (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: ANRO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NRXP is a small-cap quality compounder stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock; AXSM is a mid-cap high-growth stock; SAVA is a small-cap quality compounder stock. KO pays a dividend while ANRO, NRXP, AXSM, SAVA do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.