Shell Companies
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
ANSC vs BHVN vs NKTR vs AGRI vs INCY
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Agricultural Farm Products
Biotechnology
ANSC vs BHVN vs NKTR vs AGRI vs INCY — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Shell Companies | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Agricultural Farm Products | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $373M | $1.04B | $1.66B | $312K | $19.69B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $0.00 | $56M | $1M | $5.36B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $9M | $-648M | $-158M | $-19M | $1.43B |
| Gross Margin | — | — | 80.1% | 38.8% | 91.9% |
| Operating Margin | — | — | -226.3% | -10.6% | 26.8% |
| Forward P/E | 59.7x | — | — | — | 13.1x |
| Total Debt | $838K | $279M | $149M | $1M | $69M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $0.00 | $230M | $15M | $490K | $3.10B |
ANSC vs BHVN vs NKTR vs AGRI vs INCY — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jan 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Agriculture & Natur… (ANSC) | 100 | 111.8 | +11.8% |
| Biohaven Ltd. (BHVN) | 100 | 22.2 | -77.8% |
| Nektar Therapeutics (NKTR) | 100 | 1007.3 | +907.3% |
| AgriFORCE Growing S… (AGRI) | 100 | 0.3 | -99.7% |
| Incyte Corporation (INCY) | 100 | 167.7 | +67.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ANSC vs BHVN vs NKTR vs AGRI vs INCY
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ANSC lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Among these 5 stocks, BHVN doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
NKTR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum is your priority.
- +7.8% vs AGRI's -95.6%
AGRI ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth.
- 317.0% revenue growth vs NKTR's -43.9%
INCY carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 0.87
- Rev growth 21.2%, EPS growth 41.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 14.8%
- 35.3% 10Y total return vs BHVN's 35.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.87, Low D/E 1.3%, current ratio 3.32x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 317.0% revenue growth vs NKTR's -43.9% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 26.7% margin vs AGRI's -14.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.87 vs AGRI's 2.22, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +7.8% vs AGRI's -95.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 21.7% ROA vs BHVN's -138.0%, ROIC 51.1% vs -242.1% |
ANSC vs BHVN vs NKTR vs AGRI vs INCY — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
ANSC vs BHVN vs NKTR vs AGRI vs INCY — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
INCY leads in 3 of 6 categories
NKTR leads 1 • ANSC leads 1 • BHVN leads 0 • AGRI leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
INCY leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
INCY and BHVN operate at a comparable scale, with $5.4B and $0 in trailing revenue. INCY is the more profitable business, keeping 26.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AGRI's -14.4%. On growth, INCY holds the edge at +20.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $0 | $56M | $1M | $5.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$8M | -$646M | -$125M | -$13M | $1.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $9M | -$648M | -$158M | -$19M | $1.4B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $0 | -$594M | -$160M | -$9M | $1.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | — | +80.1% | +38.8% | +91.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | — | -2.3% | -10.6% | +26.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | — | -2.8% | -14.4% | +26.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | — | -2.9% | -6.8% | +27.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | +3.8% | — | +20.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.0% | +59.4% | +49.7% | +12.6% | +83.8% |
Valuation Metrics
INCY leads this category, winning 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.4x trailing earnings, INCY trades at a 74% valuation discount to ANSC's 59.7x P/E.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $373M | $1.0B | $1.7B | $311,837 | $19.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $374M | $1.1B | $1.8B | $1M | $16.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 59.68x | -1.44x | -8.42x | -0.02x | 15.38x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — | 13.15x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | — | 11.60x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | — | 30.09x | 4.59x | 3.83x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.42x | 20.38x | 15.38x | 0.05x | 3.83x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 9999.00x | — | — | — | 14.54x |
Profitability & Efficiency
INCY leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
INCY delivers a 29.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $29 in annual profit, vs $-9 for BHVN. ANSC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BHVN's 5.36x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), INCY scores 7/9 vs NKTR's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +2.5% | -8.7% | -87.0% | -159.9% | +29.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.3% | -138.0% | -40.7% | -117.7% | +21.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -2.3% | -2.4% | -57.2% | -98.0% | +51.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -2.9% | -187.2% | -55.7% | -117.1% | +29.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | 5.36x | 1.66x | 0.24x | 0.01x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $838,404 | $49M | $134M | $995,040 | -$3.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $0 | $230M | $15M | $489,868 | $3.1B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $838,405 | $279M | $149M | $1M | $69M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — | -6.23x | -7.20x | 759.79x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NKTR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BHVN five years ago would be worth $13,507 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $0 for AGRI. Over the past 12 months, NKTR leads with a +782.4% total return vs AGRI's -95.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NKTR at 92.1% vs AGRI's -96.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +1.3% | -9.0% | +88.6% | -52.4% | -2.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +5.6% | -51.3% | +782.4% | -95.6% | +65.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +12.6% | -30.6% | +609.0% | -100.0% | +49.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +12.6% | +35.1% | -72.3% | -100.0% | +21.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +12.6% | +35.1% | -59.8% | -100.0% | +35.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +4.0% | -11.5% | +92.1% | -96.9% | +14.4% |
Risk & Volatility
ANSC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ANSC is the less volatile stock with a -0.01 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AGRI's 2.22 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ANSC currently trades 99.9% from its 52-week high vs AGRI's 4.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.01x | 1.23x | 1.80x | 2.22x | 0.87x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $11.35 | $22.05 | $109.00 | $19.26 | $112.29 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $10.70 | $7.48 | $7.99 | $0.55 | $57.77 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.9% | +44.7% | +75.1% | +4.0% | +87.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 62.1 | 48.7 | 50.5 | 30.6 | 53.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 22K | 2.0M | 977K | 443K | 1.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BHVN as "Buy", NKTR as "Buy", AGRI as "Buy", INCY as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 80.8% upside for BHVN (target: $18) vs 11.1% for INCY (target: $110).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $17.83 | $147.33 | — | $109.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 25 | 33 | 2 | 44 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.1% |
INCY leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). NKTR leads in 1 (Total Returns).
ANSC vs BHVN vs NKTR vs AGRI vs INCY: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ANSC or BHVN or NKTR or AGRI or INCY a better buy right now?
For growth investors, AgriFORCE Growing Systems Ltd.
(AGRI) is the stronger pick with 317. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -43. 9% for Nektar Therapeutics (NKTR). Incyte Corporation (INCY) offers the better valuation at 15. 4x trailing P/E (13. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Biohaven Ltd. (BHVN) a "Buy" — based on 25 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ANSC or BHVN or NKTR or AGRI or INCY?
On trailing P/E, Incyte Corporation (INCY) is the cheapest at 15.
4x versus Agriculture & Natural Solutions Acquisition Corporation Class A Ordinary Shares at 59. 7x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ANSC or BHVN or NKTR or AGRI or INCY?
Over the past 5 years, Biohaven Ltd.
(BHVN) delivered a total return of +35. 1%, compared to -100. 0% for AgriFORCE Growing Systems Ltd. (AGRI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: INCY returned +35. 3% versus AGRI's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ANSC or BHVN or NKTR or AGRI or INCY?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Agriculture & Natural Solutions Acquisition Corporation Class A Ordinary Shares (ANSC) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
01β versus AgriFORCE Growing Systems Ltd. 's 2. 22β — meaning AGRI is approximately -26555% more volatile than ANSC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Agriculture & Natural Solutions Acquisition Corporation Class A Ordinary Shares (ANSC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 5% for Biohaven Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ANSC or BHVN or NKTR or AGRI or INCY?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), AgriFORCE Growing Systems Ltd.
(AGRI) is pulling ahead at 317. 0% versus -43. 9% for Nektar Therapeutics (NKTR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Incyte Corporation grew EPS 41. 7% year-over-year, compared to -12. 1% for Nektar Therapeutics. Over a 3-year CAGR, INCY leads at 14. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ANSC or BHVN or NKTR or AGRI or INCY?
Incyte Corporation (INCY) is the more profitable company, earning 25.
0% net margin versus -239. 7% for AgriFORCE Growing Systems Ltd. — meaning it keeps 25. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: INCY leads at 26. 1% versus -153. 2% for AGRI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NKTR leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ANSC or BHVN or NKTR or AGRI or INCY more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BHVN: 80.
8% to $17. 83.
08Which pays a better dividend — ANSC or BHVN or NKTR or AGRI or INCY?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is ANSC or BHVN or NKTR or AGRI or INCY better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Agriculture & Natural Solutions Acquisition Corporation Class A Ordinary Shares (ANSC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
01)). AgriFORCE Growing Systems Ltd. (AGRI) carries a higher beta of 2. 22 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ANSC: +12. 6%, AGRI: -100. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ANSC and BHVN and NKTR and AGRI and INCY?
These companies operate in different sectors (ANSC (Financial Services) and BHVN (Healthcare) and NKTR (Healthcare) and AGRI (Consumer Defensive) and INCY (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: ANSC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BHVN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NKTR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AGRI is a small-cap high-growth stock; INCY is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.