ANTA vs CLSK

For growth investors, Antalpha Platform Holding Company (ANTA) is the stronger pick with 321.

0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 102. 2% for CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK). CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK) offers the better valuation at 12. 5x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Antalpha Platform Holding Company (ANTA) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, CleanSpark, Inc.

(CLSK) is the cheapest at 12. 5x versus Antalpha Platform Holding Company at 51. 3x.

Over the past 5 years, Antalpha Platform Holding Company (ANTA) delivered a total return of -23.

9%, compared to -26. 9% for CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ANTA returned -23. 9% versus CLSK's -84. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Antalpha Platform Holding Company (ANTA) is the lower-risk stock at 1.

63β versus CleanSpark, Inc. 's 3. 39β — meaning CLSK is approximately 108% more volatile than ANTA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 38% versus 9% for Antalpha Platform Holding Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Antalpha Platform Holding Company (ANTA) is pulling ahead at 321.

0% versus 102. 2% for CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: CleanSpark, Inc. grew EPS 262. 3% year-over-year, compared to 165. 5% for Antalpha Platform Holding Company. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

CleanSpark, Inc.

(CLSK) is the more profitable company, earning 47. 6% net margin versus 9. 3% for Antalpha Platform Holding Company — meaning it keeps 47. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CLSK leads at 41. 6% versus 6. 7% for ANTA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CLSK leads at 41. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

In this comparison, CLSK (0.

2% yield) pays a dividend. ANTA does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Antalpha Platform Holding Company (ANTA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding.

CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK) carries a higher beta of 3. 39 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ANTA: -23. 9%, CLSK: -84. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (ANTA (Financial Services) and CLSK (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.