AOSL vs ON

For growth investors, Alpha and Omega Semiconductor Limited (AOSL) is the stronger pick with 5.

9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -15. 3% for ON Semiconductor Corporation (ON). ON Semiconductor Corporation (ON) offers the better valuation at 346. 8x trailing P/E (34. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Alpha and Omega Semiconductor Limited (AOSL) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

Over the past 5 years, ON Semiconductor Corporation (ON) delivered a total return of +160.

4%, compared to +23. 2% for Alpha and Omega Semiconductor Limited (AOSL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ON returned +1004% versus AOSL's +172. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), ON Semiconductor Corporation (ON) is the lower-risk stock at 1.

95β versus Alpha and Omega Semiconductor Limited's 2. 81β — meaning AOSL is approximately 44% more volatile than ON relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Alpha and Omega Semiconductor Limited (AOSL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 6% versus 45% for ON Semiconductor Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Alpha and Omega Semiconductor Limited (AOSL) is pulling ahead at 5.

9% versus -15. 3% for ON Semiconductor Corporation (ON). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: ON Semiconductor Corporation grew EPS -92. 0% year-over-year, compared to -746. 2% for Alpha and Omega Semiconductor Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, AOSL leads at -3. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

ON Semiconductor Corporation (ON) is the more profitable company, earning 2.

0% net margin versus -13. 9% for Alpha and Omega Semiconductor Limited — meaning it keeps 2. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ON leads at 12. 5% versus -4. 1% for AOSL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ON leads at 32. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AOSL: -3.

8% to $36. 00.

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, ON Semiconductor Corporation (ON) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+1004% 10Y return).

Alpha and Omega Semiconductor Limited (AOSL) carries a higher beta of 2. 81 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ON: +1004%, AOSL: +172. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.