Asset Management
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
APAM vs AMG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Asset Management
APAM vs AMG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Asset Management | Asset Management |
| Market Cap | $2.65B | $8.10B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.20B | $2.45B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $290M | $717M |
| Gross Margin | 45.7% | 86.0% |
| Operating Margin | 33.4% | 31.8% |
| Forward P/E | 9.8x | 9.2x |
| Total Debt | $410M | $2.69B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $256M | $586M |
APAM vs AMG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Artisan Partners As… (APAM) | 100 | 129.7 | +29.7% |
| Affiliated Managers… (AMG) | 100 | 455.8 | +355.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: APAM vs AMG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
APAM is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.17, yield 10.4%
- 127.8% 10Y total return vs AMG's 89.1%
- Efficiency ratio 0.1% vs AMG's 0.5% (lower = leaner)
AMG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 19.8%, EPS growth 50.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.14, Low D/E 60.9%
- PEG 0.23 vs APAM's 2.76
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 19.8% NII/revenue growth vs APAM's 7.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.2x vs 9.8x), PEG 0.23 vs 2.76 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.1% vs AMG's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.14 vs APAM's 1.17 | |
| Dividends | 10.4% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +75.9% vs APAM's +3.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.1% vs AMG's 0.5% |
APAM vs AMG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
APAM vs AMG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMG leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMG is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.4B annually — 2.0x APAM's $1.2B. AMG is the more profitable business, keeping 29.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to APAM's 24.3%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.2B | $2.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $424M | $855M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $290M | $717M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $172M | $978M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +45.7% | +86.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +33.4% | +31.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +24.3% | +29.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +14.3% | +41.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +35.6% | +149.1% |
Valuation Metrics
AMG leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.3x trailing earnings, APAM trades at a 31% valuation discount to AMG's 13.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), AMG offers better value at 0.34x vs APAM's 2.61x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.7B | $8.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.8B | $10.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 9.28x | 13.35x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.82x | 9.16x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 2.61x | 0.34x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 6.86x | 10.77x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.21x | 3.31x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.15x | 2.27x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 15.47x | 8.06x |
Profitability & Efficiency
APAM leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
APAM delivers a 44.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $45 in annual profit, vs $16 for AMG. APAM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.52x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AMG's 0.61x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AMG scores 8/9 vs APAM's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +44.9% | +16.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +19.4% | +8.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +26.7% | +8.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +29.9% | +8.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.52x | 0.61x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $155M | $2.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $256M | $586M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $410M | $2.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 58.20x | 9.69x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AMG leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AMG five years ago would be worth $18,023 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,153 for APAM. Over the past 12 months, AMG leads with a +75.9% total return vs APAM's +3.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AMG at 29.0% vs APAM's 13.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -5.4% | +5.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +3.6% | +75.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +45.9% | +114.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1.5% | +80.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +127.8% | +89.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +13.4% | +29.0% |
Risk & Volatility
AMG leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AMG is the less volatile stock with a 1.14 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than APAM's 1.17 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AMG currently trades 90.7% from its 52-week high vs APAM's 77.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.17x | 1.14x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $48.50 | $334.78 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $34.99 | $170.27 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +77.5% | +90.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 45.6 | 55.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 755K | 352K |
Analyst Outlook
APAM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates APAM as "Hold" and AMG as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 9.2% upside for AMG (target: $332) vs 6.4% for APAM (target: $40). APAM is the only dividend payer here at 10.43% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $40.00 | $331.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 15 | 12 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +10.4% | +0.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $3.92 | $0.03 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +8.7% |
AMG leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). APAM leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Analyst Outlook).
APAM vs AMG: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is APAM or AMG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Affiliated Managers Group, Inc.
(AMG) is the stronger pick with 19. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 7. 6% for Artisan Partners Asset Management Inc. (APAM). Artisan Partners Asset Management Inc. (APAM) offers the better valuation at 9. 3x trailing P/E (9. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. (AMG) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — APAM or AMG?
On trailing P/E, Artisan Partners Asset Management Inc.
(APAM) is the cheapest at 9. 3x versus Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. at 13. 4x. On forward P/E, Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. wins at 0. 23x versus Artisan Partners Asset Management Inc. 's 2. 76x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — APAM or AMG?
Over the past 5 years, Affiliated Managers Group, Inc.
(AMG) delivered a total return of +80. 2%, compared to +1. 5% for Artisan Partners Asset Management Inc. (APAM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: APAM returned +127. 8% versus AMG's +89. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — APAM or AMG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Affiliated Managers Group, Inc.
(AMG) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 14β versus Artisan Partners Asset Management Inc. 's 1. 17β — meaning APAM is approximately 3% more volatile than AMG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Artisan Partners Asset Management Inc. (APAM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 52% versus 61% for Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — APAM or AMG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Affiliated Managers Group, Inc.
(AMG) is pulling ahead at 19. 8% versus 7. 6% for Artisan Partners Asset Management Inc. (APAM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. grew EPS 50. 3% year-over-year, compared to 10. 7% for Artisan Partners Asset Management Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — APAM or AMG?
Affiliated Managers Group, Inc.
(AMG) is the more profitable company, earning 29. 3% net margin versus 24. 3% for Artisan Partners Asset Management Inc. — meaning it keeps 29. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: APAM leads at 33. 4% versus 31. 8% for AMG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AMG leads at 86. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is APAM or AMG more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. (AMG) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 23x versus Artisan Partners Asset Management Inc. 's 2. 76x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. (AMG) trades at 9. 2x forward P/E versus 9. 8x for Artisan Partners Asset Management Inc. — 0. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AMG: 9. 2% to $331. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — APAM or AMG?
In this comparison, APAM (10.
4% yield) pays a dividend. AMG does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is APAM or AMG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Artisan Partners Asset Management Inc.
(APAM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 17), 10. 4% yield, +127. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (APAM: +127. 8%, AMG: +89. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between APAM and AMG?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: APAM is a small-cap deep-value stock; AMG is a small-cap high-growth stock. APAM pays a dividend while AMG does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.