Information Technology Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
APLD vs BTBT vs CIFR vs IREN vs CORZ
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Capital Markets
Financial - Capital Markets
Financial - Capital Markets
Software - Infrastructure
APLD vs BTBT vs CIFR vs IREN vs CORZ — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Information Technology Services | Financial - Capital Markets | Financial - Capital Markets | Financial - Capital Markets | Software - Infrastructure |
| Market Cap | $11.89B | $589M | $8.40B | $18.86B | $7.06B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $282M | $164M | $224M | $501M | $355M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-123M | $137M | $-898M | $402M | $-1.22B |
| Gross Margin | 16.4% | 61.9% | 28.4% | 68.3% | 16.9% |
| Operating Margin | -31.5% | 16.8% | -150.7% | 3.5% | -26.3% |
| Forward P/E | — | 9.2x | — | 139.2x | 267.1x |
| Total Debt | $703M | $14M | $2.77B | $964M | $1.06B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $114M | $95M | $628M | $565M | $311M |
APLD vs BTBT vs CIFR vs IREN vs CORZ — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jan 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Applied Digital Cor… (APLD) | 100 | 808.0 | +708.0% |
| Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) | 100 | 69.3 | -30.7% |
| Cipher Mining Inc. (CIFR) | 100 | 680.4 | +580.4% |
| IREN Limited (IREN) | 100 | 1450.3 | +1350.3% |
| Core Scientific, In… (CORZ) | 100 | 760.5 | +660.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: APLD vs BTBT vs CIFR vs IREN vs CORZ
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
APLD ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 3.23, yield 0.0%
- 7.6% 10Y total return vs CORZ's 5.5%
- 0.0% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs BTBT's 0.3%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
BTBT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and defensive.
- Rev growth 264.6%, EPS growth 225.0%
- Beta 3.37, yield 0.3%, current ratio 5.39x
- 264.6% NII/revenue growth vs CORZ's -37.5%
- Lower P/E (9.2x vs 267.1x)
Among these 5 stocks, CIFR doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
IREN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 2.97, Low D/E 53.1%, current ratio 4.29x
- 17.4% margin vs CIFR's -367.2%
- +7.7% vs BTBT's -9.0%
CORZ is the clearest fit if your priority is stability.
- Beta 2.50 vs CIFR's 3.87
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 264.6% NII/revenue growth vs CORZ's -37.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.2x vs 267.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 17.4% margin vs CIFR's -367.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 2.50 vs CIFR's 3.87 | |
| Dividends | 0.0% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs BTBT's 0.3%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +7.7% vs BTBT's -9.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 19.0% ROA vs CORZ's -50.2% |
APLD vs BTBT vs CIFR vs IREN vs CORZ — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
APLD vs BTBT vs CIFR vs IREN vs CORZ — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
BTBT leads in 3 of 6 categories
APLD leads 0 • CIFR leads 0 • IREN leads 0 • CORZ leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BTBT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IREN is the larger business by revenue, generating $501M annually — 3.1x BTBT's $164M. IREN is the more profitable business, keeping 17.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CIFR's -3.7%. On growth, APLD holds the edge at +98.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $282M | $164M | $224M | $501M | $355M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$53M | $166M | -$203M | $172M | -$47M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$123M | $137M | -$898M | $402M | -$1.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$1.3B | -$448M | -$930M | -$260M | -$471M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +16.4% | +61.9% | +28.4% | +68.3% | +16.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -31.5% | +16.8% | -150.7% | +3.5% | -26.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -43.5% | +17.3% | -3.7% | +17.4% | -3.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -4.8% | -65.3% | -3.1% | -2.2% | -132.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +98.2% | — | — | — | +44.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +89.4% | +2.8% | -154.5% | -7.1% | -185.5% |
Valuation Metrics
BTBT leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.2x trailing earnings, BTBT trades at a 94% valuation discount to IREN's 145.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, BTBT's 8.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than APLD's 1099.7x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $11.9B | $589M | $8.4B | $18.9B | $7.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $12.5B | $508M | $10.5B | $19.3B | $7.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -35.80x | 9.15x | -9.62x | 145.77x | -25.41x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | 139.17x | 267.14x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 1099.67x | 8.49x | — | 97.06x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 55.16x | 3.60x | 37.49x | 37.64x | 22.12x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 13.18x | 0.56x | 9.44x | 6.98x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
BTBT leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BTBT delivers a 21.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $21 in annual profit, vs $-116 for CIFR. BTBT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CIFR's 3.31x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BTBT scores 6/9 vs CIFR's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -6.2% | +21.4% | -115.5% | +18.6% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -2.3% | +19.0% | -24.7% | +9.9% | -50.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -7.3% | +6.5% | -11.7% | +0.7% | — |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -9.5% | +8.5% | -15.6% | +0.9% | -9.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 6 | 3 | 6 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.11x | 0.03x | 3.31x | 0.53x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $589M | -$81M | $2.1B | $400M | $749M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $114M | $95M | $628M | $565M | $311M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $703M | $14M | $2.8B | $964M | $1.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -2.01x | — | -32.12x | 16.60x | 5.50x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — APLD and IREN each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in APLD five years ago would be worth $85,629 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,543 for BTBT. Over the past 12 months, IREN leads with a +765.3% total return vs BTBT's -9.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors IREN at 158.8% vs BTBT's -7.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +47.7% | -10.3% | +27.7% | +33.1% | +39.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +691.0% | -9.0% | +584.9% | +765.3% | +151.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1125.1% | -19.7% | +960.8% | +1633.2% | +550.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +756.3% | -84.6% | +107.9% | +132.5% | +550.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +756.3% | -60.4% | +108.9% | +132.5% | +550.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +130.5% | -7.1% | +119.7% | +158.8% | +86.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — APLD and CORZ each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CORZ is the less volatile stock with a 2.50 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CIFR's 3.87 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. APLD currently trades 93.9% from its 52-week high vs BTBT's 40.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 3.23x | 3.37x | 3.87x | 2.97x | 2.50x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $44.22 | $4.55 | $25.52 | $76.87 | $25.01 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.09 | $1.25 | $2.95 | $6.36 | $8.74 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +93.9% | +40.2% | +81.1% | +74.0% | +89.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 74.4 | 69.1 | 67.5 | 71.3 | 78.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 20.3M | 18.5M | 24.9M | 34.5M | 13.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — APLD and BTBT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: APLD as "Buy", BTBT as "Buy", CIFR as "Buy", IREN as "Buy", CORZ as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 173.2% upside for BTBT (target: $5) vs 6.4% for CORZ (target: $24). BTBT is the only dividend payer here at 0.31% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $61.00 | $5.00 | $27.86 | $75.57 | $23.80 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 13 | 2 | 12 | 13 | 22 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.0% | +0.3% | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.01 | $0.01 | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.3% | 0.0% | +1.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
BTBT leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics. 3 categories are tied.
APLD vs BTBT vs CIFR vs IREN vs CORZ: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is APLD or BTBT or CIFR or IREN or CORZ a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Bit Digital, Inc.
(BTBT) is the stronger pick with 264. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -37. 5% for Core Scientific, Inc. (CORZ). Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) offers the better valuation at 9. 2x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Applied Digital Corporation (APLD) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — APLD or BTBT or CIFR or IREN or CORZ?
On trailing P/E, Bit Digital, Inc.
(BTBT) is the cheapest at 9. 2x versus IREN Limited at 145. 8x. On forward P/E, IREN Limited is actually cheaper at 139. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — APLD or BTBT or CIFR or IREN or CORZ?
Over the past 5 years, Applied Digital Corporation (APLD) delivered a total return of +756.
3%, compared to -84. 6% for Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: APLD returned +756. 3% versus BTBT's -60. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — APLD or BTBT or CIFR or IREN or CORZ?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Core Scientific, Inc.
(CORZ) is the lower-risk stock at 2. 50β versus Cipher Mining Inc. 's 3. 87β — meaning CIFR is approximately 55% more volatile than CORZ relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 3% for Cipher Mining Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — APLD or BTBT or CIFR or IREN or CORZ?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Bit Digital, Inc.
(BTBT) is pulling ahead at 264. 6% versus -37. 5% for Core Scientific, Inc. (CORZ). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: IREN Limited grew EPS 234. 5% year-over-year, compared to -1435. 7% for Cipher Mining Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, APLD leads at 193. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — APLD or BTBT or CIFR or IREN or CORZ?
IREN Limited (IREN) is the more profitable company, earning 17.
4% net margin versus -367. 2% for Cipher Mining Inc. — meaning it keeps 17. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BTBT leads at 16. 8% versus -150. 7% for CIFR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — IREN leads at 68. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is APLD or BTBT or CIFR or IREN or CORZ more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, IREN Limited (IREN) trades at 139.
2x forward P/E versus 267. 1x for Core Scientific, Inc. — 128. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BTBT: 173. 2% to $5. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — APLD or BTBT or CIFR or IREN or CORZ?
In this comparison, BTBT (0.
3% yield) pays a dividend. APLD, CIFR, IREN, CORZ do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is APLD or BTBT or CIFR or IREN or CORZ better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Applied Digital Corporation (APLD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+756.
3% 10Y return). Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) carries a higher beta of 3. 37 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (APLD: +756. 3%, BTBT: -60. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between APLD and BTBT and CIFR and IREN and CORZ?
These companies operate in different sectors (APLD (Technology) and BTBT (Financial Services) and CIFR (Financial Services) and IREN (Financial Services) and CORZ (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: APLD is a mid-cap high-growth stock; BTBT is a small-cap high-growth stock; CIFR is a small-cap high-growth stock; IREN is a mid-cap high-growth stock; CORZ is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.