REIT - Hotel & Motel
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
APLE vs CLDT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Hotel & Motel
APLE vs CLDT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Hotel & Motel | REIT - Hotel & Motel |
| Market Cap | $3.31B | $416M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.42B | $295M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $172M | $15M |
| Gross Margin | 30.5% | 3.5% |
| Operating Margin | 17.6% | 11.5% |
| Forward P/E | 20.8x | 63.2x |
| Total Debt | $1.77B | $359M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $39M | $33M |
APLE vs CLDT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apple Hospitality R… (APLE) | 100 | 137.2 | +37.2% |
| Chatham Lodging Tru… (CLDT) | 100 | 131.1 | +31.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: APLE vs CLDT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
APLE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.85, yield 6.9%
- Rev growth -1.3%, EPS growth -16.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 4.5%
- 19.1% 10Y total return vs CLDT's -32.4%
In this particular matchup, CLDT is outpaced on most metrics by others in the set.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -1.3% FFO/revenue growth vs CLDT's -7.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (20.8x vs 63.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 12.1% margin vs CLDT's 5.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.85 vs CLDT's 1.00 | |
| Dividends | 6.9% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +32.4% vs CLDT's +31.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.5% ROA vs CLDT's 1.3%, ROIC 3.9% vs 1.7% |
APLE vs CLDT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
APLE vs CLDT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
APLE leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
APLE is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.4B annually — 4.8x CLDT's $295M. APLE is the more profitable business, keeping 12.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CLDT's 5.1%. On growth, APLE holds the edge at +3.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.4B | $295M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $444M | $94M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $172M | $15M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $320M | $51M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +30.5% | +3.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +17.6% | +11.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +12.1% | +5.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +22.5% | +17.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.1% | -9.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -7.7% | +163.9% |
Valuation Metrics
CLDT leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 18.9x trailing earnings, APLE trades at a 70% valuation discount to CLDT's 63.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CLDT's 8.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than APLE's 11.4x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.3B | $416M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $5.0B | $743M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 18.93x | 63.21x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 20.76x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.38x | 8.61x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.34x | 1.41x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.06x | 0.57x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 11.69x | 10.52x |
Profitability & Efficiency
APLE leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
APLE delivers a 5.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $5 in annual profit, vs $2 for CLDT. CLDT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.46x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to APLE's 0.56x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CLDT scores 6/9 vs APLE's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +5.4% | +1.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.5% | +1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.9% | +1.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.3% | +2.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.56x | 0.46x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.7B | $326M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $39M | $33M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.8B | $359M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.97x | 1.69x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
APLE leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in APLE five years ago would be worth $11,603 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,814 for CLDT. Over the past 12 months, APLE leads with a +32.4% total return vs CLDT's +31.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors APLE at 3.5% vs CLDT's -0.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +18.8% | +31.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +32.4% | +31.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +10.8% | -2.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +16.0% | -21.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +19.1% | -32.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +3.5% | -0.8% |
Risk & Volatility
APLE leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
APLE is the less volatile stock with a 0.85 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CLDT's 1.00 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.85x | 1.00x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $14.03 | $9.04 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $10.85 | $6.08 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.9% | +97.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 69.9 | 64.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.2M | 266K |
Analyst Outlook
CLDT leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates APLE as "Buy" and CLDT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 24.3% upside for CLDT (target: $11) vs -0.1% for APLE (target: $14). APLE is the only dividend payer here at 6.86% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $14.00 | $11.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 17 | 13 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +6.9% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.96 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.9% | +2.2% |
APLE leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CLDT leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook).
APLE vs CLDT: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is APLE or CLDT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Apple Hospitality REIT, Inc.
(APLE) is the stronger pick with -1. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -7. 0% for Chatham Lodging Trust (CLDT). Apple Hospitality REIT, Inc. (APLE) offers the better valuation at 18. 9x trailing P/E (20. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Apple Hospitality REIT, Inc. (APLE) a "Buy" — based on 17 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — APLE or CLDT?
On trailing P/E, Apple Hospitality REIT, Inc.
(APLE) is the cheapest at 18. 9x versus Chatham Lodging Trust at 63. 2x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — APLE or CLDT?
Over the past 5 years, Apple Hospitality REIT, Inc.
(APLE) delivered a total return of +16. 0%, compared to -21. 9% for Chatham Lodging Trust (CLDT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: APLE returned +19. 1% versus CLDT's -32. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — APLE or CLDT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Apple Hospitality REIT, Inc.
(APLE) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 85β versus Chatham Lodging Trust's 1. 00β — meaning CLDT is approximately 17% more volatile than APLE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Chatham Lodging Trust (CLDT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 46% versus 56% for Apple Hospitality REIT, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — APLE or CLDT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Apple Hospitality REIT, Inc.
(APLE) is pulling ahead at -1. 3% versus -7. 0% for Chatham Lodging Trust (CLDT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Chatham Lodging Trust grew EPS 275. 0% year-over-year, compared to -16. 9% for Apple Hospitality REIT, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, APLE leads at 4. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — APLE or CLDT?
Apple Hospitality REIT, Inc.
(APLE) is the more profitable company, earning 12. 4% net margin versus 5. 1% for Chatham Lodging Trust — meaning it keeps 12. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: APLE leads at 17. 7% versus 9. 0% for CLDT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — APLE leads at 6. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is APLE or CLDT more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CLDT: 24.
3% to $11. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — APLE or CLDT?
In this comparison, APLE (6.
9% yield) pays a dividend. CLDT does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is APLE or CLDT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Apple Hospitality REIT, Inc.
(APLE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 85), 6. 9% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (APLE: +19. 1%, CLDT: -32. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between APLE and CLDT?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: APLE is a small-cap income-oriented stock; CLDT is a small-cap quality compounder stock. APLE pays a dividend while CLDT does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.