Construction
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
APOG vs TREX vs AWI vs GFF vs DHI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Construction
Construction
Conglomerates
Residential Construction
APOG vs TREX vs AWI vs GFF vs DHI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Construction | Construction | Construction | Conglomerates | Residential Construction |
| Market Cap | $788M | $4.18B | $6.90B | $4.10B | $42.77B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.40B | $1.18B | $1.65B | $2.35B | $33.35B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $54M | $191M | $306M | $35M | $3.17B |
| Gross Margin | 22.7% | 39.2% | 40.3% | 42.6% | 22.8% |
| Operating Margin | 6.7% | 22.1% | 27.5% | 8.3% | 11.8% |
| Forward P/E | 10.7x | 24.2x | 19.5x | 16.8x | 14.0x |
| Total Debt | $286M | $229M | $532M | $1.59B | $6.03B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $40M | $4M | $113M | $99M | $2.99B |
APOG vs TREX vs AWI vs GFF vs DHI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apogee Enterprises,… (APOG) | 100 | 177.5 | +77.5% |
| Trex Company, Inc. (TREX) | 100 | 66.9 | -33.1% |
| Armstrong World Ind… (AWI) | 100 | 214.6 | +114.6% |
| Griffon Corporation (GFF) | 100 | 563.9 | +463.9% |
| D.R. Horton, Inc. (DHI) | 100 | 267.0 | +167.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: APOG vs TREX vs AWI vs GFF vs DHI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
APOG is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and valuation efficiency is your priority.
- Dividend streak 14 yrs, beta 1.25, yield 2.8%
- PEG 0.32 vs TREX's 7.25
- Lower P/E (10.7x vs 14.0x), PEG 0.32 vs 1.11
- 2.8% yield, 14-year raise streak, vs GFF's 1.0%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
TREX lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
AWI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 12.1%, EPS growth 17.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 9.5%
- 12.1% revenue growth vs DHI's -6.9%
- 18.6% margin vs GFF's 1.5%
- Beta 0.81 vs TREX's 1.52
GFF ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding.
- 5.4% 10Y total return vs DHI's 429.9%
- +25.2% vs TREX's -31.0%
DHI is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.86, Low D/E 24.4%, current ratio 17.39x
- Beta 0.86, yield 1.1%, current ratio 17.39x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 12.1% revenue growth vs DHI's -6.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.7x vs 14.0x), PEG 0.32 vs 1.11 | |
| Quality / Margins | 18.6% margin vs GFF's 1.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.81 vs TREX's 1.52 | |
| Dividends | 2.8% yield, 14-year raise streak, vs GFF's 1.0%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +25.2% vs TREX's -31.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 16.0% ROA vs GFF's 1.7%, ROIC 24.9% vs 9.1% |
APOG vs TREX vs AWI vs GFF vs DHI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
APOG vs TREX vs AWI vs GFF vs DHI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
AWI leads in 2 of 6 categories
APOG leads 2 • GFF leads 1 • TREX leads 0 • DHI leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AWI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DHI is the larger business by revenue, generating $33.3B annually — 28.3x TREX's $1.2B. AWI is the more profitable business, keeping 18.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GFF's 1.5%. On growth, AWI holds the edge at +7.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.4B | $1.2B | $1.6B | $2.3B | $33.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $57M | $309M | $603M | $243M | $4.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $54M | $191M | $306M | $35M | $3.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $95M | $239M | $247M | $287M | $3.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +22.7% | +39.2% | +40.3% | +42.6% | +22.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +6.7% | +22.1% | +27.5% | +8.3% | +11.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +3.9% | +16.3% | +18.6% | +1.5% | +9.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +6.8% | +20.3% | +15.0% | +12.2% | +10.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +1.6% | +1.0% | +7.1% | -31.0% | -2.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.1% | +3.6% | -1.9% | -65.3% | -13.2% |
Valuation Metrics
APOG leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.8x trailing earnings, DHI trades at a 84% valuation discount to GFF's 80.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), APOG offers better value at 0.43x vs TREX's 6.75x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $788M | $4.2B | $6.9B | $4.1B | $42.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.0B | $4.4B | $7.3B | $5.6B | $45.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 14.54x | 22.58x | 22.85x | 80.75x | 12.76x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.66x | 24.24x | 19.47x | 16.79x | 13.96x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.43x | 6.75x | — | 4.53x | 1.02x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 21.98x | 13.72x | 16.90x | 20.77x | 10.12x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.56x | 3.56x | 4.26x | 1.63x | 1.25x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.54x | 4.16x | 7.83x | 55.55x | 1.85x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 8.28x | 31.05x | 28.05x | 13.51x | 13.03x |
Profitability & Efficiency
AWI leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GFF delivers a 40.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $11 for APOG. TREX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.22x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GFF's 21.52x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AWI scores 9/9 vs DHI's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +10.8% | +18.8% | +34.8% | +40.8% | +12.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.8% | +12.3% | +16.0% | +1.7% | +8.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +8.1% | +16.4% | +24.9% | +9.1% | +12.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.7% | +23.2% | +26.5% | +11.0% | +13.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 | 9 | 6 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.56x | 0.22x | 0.59x | 21.52x | 0.24x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $247M | $225M | $419M | $1.5B | $3.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $40M | $4M | $113M | $99M | $3.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $286M | $229M | $532M | $1.6B | $6.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 5.97x | — | 13.31x | 4.02x | 44.09x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GFF leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GFF five years ago would be worth $36,095 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,728 for TREX. Over the past 12 months, GFF leads with a +25.2% total return vs TREX's -31.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GFF at 45.3% vs TREX's -10.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -1.1% | +12.2% | -17.7% | +17.6% | +1.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -6.7% | -31.0% | +7.6% | +25.2% | +20.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +0.1% | -28.6% | +146.8% | +207.0% | +40.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +11.1% | -62.7% | +57.4% | +261.0% | +47.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +10.6% | +248.9% | +322.1% | +540.7% | +429.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +0.0% | -10.6% | +35.1% | +45.3% | +11.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — AWI and GFF each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AWI is the less volatile stock with a 0.81 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TREX's 1.52 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GFF currently trades 90.2% from its 52-week high vs TREX's 58.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.25x | 1.52x | 0.81x | 1.35x | 0.86x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $49.99 | $68.78 | $206.08 | $97.58 | $184.55 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $30.75 | $29.77 | $149.06 | $65.01 | $114.17 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +73.3% | +58.4% | +78.5% | +90.2% | +80.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.3 | 48.4 | 39.8 | 58.6 | 46.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 252K | 1.7M | 482K | 348K | 2.5M |
Analyst Outlook
APOG leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: APOG as "Hold", TREX as "Hold", AWI as "Buy", GFF as "Buy", DHI as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 92.4% upside for APOG (target: $71) vs 11.0% for DHI (target: $164). For income investors, APOG offers the higher dividend yield at 2.83% vs AWI's 0.78%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $70.50 | $47.44 | $197.50 | $115.00 | $163.86 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 6 | 31 | 26 | 7 | 52 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.8% | — | +0.8% | +1.0% | +1.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 14 | 2 | 8 | 1 | 11 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.04 | — | $1.27 | $0.85 | $1.60 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.9% | +1.3% | +1.9% | +4.5% | +10.0% |
AWI leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). APOG leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
APOG vs TREX vs AWI vs GFF vs DHI: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is APOG or TREX or AWI or GFF or DHI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Armstrong World Industries, Inc.
(AWI) is the stronger pick with 12. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -6. 9% for D. R. Horton, Inc. (DHI). D. R. Horton, Inc. (DHI) offers the better valuation at 12. 8x trailing P/E (14. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Armstrong World Industries, Inc. (AWI) a "Buy" — based on 26 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — APOG or TREX or AWI or GFF or DHI?
On trailing P/E, D.
R. Horton, Inc. (DHI) is the cheapest at 12. 8x versus Griffon Corporation at 80. 8x. On forward P/E, Apogee Enterprises, Inc. is actually cheaper at 10. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Apogee Enterprises, Inc. wins at 0. 32x versus Trex Company, Inc. 's 7. 25x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — APOG or TREX or AWI or GFF or DHI?
Over the past 5 years, Griffon Corporation (GFF) delivered a total return of +261.
0%, compared to -62. 7% for Trex Company, Inc. (TREX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GFF returned +540. 7% versus APOG's +10. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — APOG or TREX or AWI or GFF or DHI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Armstrong World Industries, Inc.
(AWI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 81β versus Trex Company, Inc. 's 1. 52β — meaning TREX is approximately 87% more volatile than AWI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Trex Company, Inc. (TREX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 22% versus 22% for Griffon Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — APOG or TREX or AWI or GFF or DHI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Armstrong World Industries, Inc.
(AWI) is pulling ahead at 12. 1% versus -6. 9% for D. R. Horton, Inc. (DHI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Armstrong World Industries, Inc. grew EPS 17. 6% year-over-year, compared to -74. 2% for Griffon Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, AWI leads at 9. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — APOG or TREX or AWI or GFF or DHI?
Armstrong World Industries, Inc.
(AWI) is the more profitable company, earning 19. 0% net margin versus 2. 0% for Griffon Corporation — meaning it keeps 19. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AWI leads at 26. 6% versus 6. 0% for APOG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GFF leads at 42. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is APOG or TREX or AWI or GFF or DHI more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Apogee Enterprises, Inc. (APOG) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 32x versus Trex Company, Inc. 's 7. 25x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Apogee Enterprises, Inc. (APOG) trades at 10. 7x forward P/E versus 24. 2x for Trex Company, Inc. — 13. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for APOG: 92. 4% to $70. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — APOG or TREX or AWI or GFF or DHI?
In this comparison, APOG (2.
8% yield), DHI (1. 1% yield), GFF (1. 0% yield), AWI (0. 8% yield) pay a dividend. TREX does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is APOG or TREX or AWI or GFF or DHI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, D.
R. Horton, Inc. (DHI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 86), 1. 1% yield, +429. 9% 10Y return). Trex Company, Inc. (TREX) carries a higher beta of 1. 52 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (DHI: +429. 9%, TREX: +248. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between APOG and TREX and AWI and GFF and DHI?
These companies operate in different sectors (APOG (Industrials) and TREX (Industrials) and AWI (Industrials) and GFF (Industrials) and DHI (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: APOG is a small-cap deep-value stock; TREX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AWI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GFF is a small-cap quality compounder stock; DHI is a mid-cap deep-value stock. APOG, AWI, GFF, DHI pay a dividend while TREX does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.