AQB
AquaBounty Technologies, Inc.
Agricultural Farm Products
Market Cap$4M
5Y Perf.-98.3%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
AQB vs DE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
DE
Deere & Company
Agricultural - Machinery
Market Cap$155.82B
5Y Perf.+277.9%
AQB vs DE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | AQB | DE |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Agricultural Farm Products | Agricultural - Machinery |
| Market Cap | $4M | $155.82B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $45.88B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-1.22B | $4.08B |
| Gross Margin | — | 34.7% |
| Operating Margin | — | 17.0% |
| Forward P/E | — | 32.2x |
| Total Debt | $3M | $63.94B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $501K | $8.28B |
AQB vs DE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
AQB
DE
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| AquaBounty Technolo… (AQB) | 100 | 1.7 | -98.3% |
| Deere & Company (DE) | 100 | 377.9 | +277.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AQB vs DE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: DE leads in 4 of 6 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. AquaBounty Technologies, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and recent price momentum and sentiment. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
AQB
AquaBounty Technologies, Inc.
The Growth Play
AQB is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 100.0%, EPS growth 87.7%
- 100.0% revenue growth vs DE's -2.2%
- +36.8% vs DE's +18.6%
Best for: growth exposure
DE
Deere & Company
The Income Pick
DE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 8 yrs, beta 0.56, yield 1.1%
- 6.6% 10Y total return vs AQB's -99.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.56, current ratio 2.31x
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | AQB | 100.0% revenue growth vs DE's -2.2% |
| Quality / Margins | DE | 8.9% margin vs AQB's -2.0% |
| Stability / Safety | DE | Beta 0.56 vs AQB's 1.35 |
| Dividends | DE | 1.1% yield; 8-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | AQB | +36.8% vs DE's +18.6% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | DE | 3.9% ROA vs AQB's -47.3%, ROIC 7.7% vs -30.1% |
AQB vs DE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2023
FY 2024
AQB vs DE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLDELAGGINGAQB
AQBAquaBounty Technologi…
1leads
DEDeere & Company
4leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs AQBMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
DE1/1
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
AQB1/1
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
DE6/8
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
DE5/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
DE2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DE leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DE and AQB operate at a comparable scale, with $45.9B and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | AQBAquaBounty Techno… | DEDeere & Company |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $45.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$926M | $9.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$1.2B | $4.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$4.2B | $5.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +34.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +17.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | +8.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +12.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +16.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.0% | -24.1% |
DE leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Valuation Metrics
AQB leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | AQBAquaBounty Techno… | DEDeere & Company |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4M | $155.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $7M | $211.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.20x | 31.07x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 32.21x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.90x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 19.87x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 3.49x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 6.01x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 48.23x |
AQB leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Profitability & Efficiency
DE leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
DE delivers a 15.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $15 in annual profit, vs $-3 for AQB. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DE scores 5/9 vs AQB's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | AQBAquaBounty Techno… | DEDeere & Company |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.7% | +15.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -47.3% | +3.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -30.1% | +7.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -41.3% | +11.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 2.46x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3M | $55.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $501,295 | $8.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3M | $63.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.01x | 2.74x |
DE leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
DE leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in DE five years ago would be worth $15,376 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $94 for AQB. Over the past 12 months, AQB leads with a +36.8% total return vs DE's +18.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors DE at 16.0% vs AQB's -55.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | AQBAquaBounty Techno… | DEDeere & Company |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -1.1% | +23.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +36.8% | +18.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -91.3% | +56.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.1% | +53.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.8% | +664.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -55.6% | +16.0% |
DE leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
DE leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
DE is the less volatile stock with a 0.56 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AQB's 1.35 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. DE currently trades 85.3% from its 52-week high vs AQB's 31.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | AQBAquaBounty Techno… | DEDeere & Company |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.35x | 0.56x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.95 | $674.19 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.61 | $433.00 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +31.9% | +85.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.0 | 49.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 33K | 1.1M |
DE leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
DE is the only dividend payer here at 1.10% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | AQBAquaBounty Techno… | DEDeere & Company |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $680.54 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 46 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 8 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $6.33 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.7% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
DE leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). AQB leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
Best OverallDeere & Company (DE)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
AQB vs DE: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AQB or DE a better buy right now?
Deere & Company (DE) offers the better valuation at 31.
1x trailing P/E (32. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Deere & Company (DE) a "Hold" — based on 46 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — AQB or DE?
Over the past 5 years, Deere & Company (DE) delivered a total return of +53.
8%, compared to -99. 1% for AquaBounty Technologies, Inc. (AQB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: DE returned +664. 1% versus AQB's -99. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — AQB or DE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Deere & Company (DE) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
56β versus AquaBounty Technologies, Inc. 's 1. 35β — meaning AQB is approximately 140% more volatile than DE relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — AQB or DE?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: AquaBounty Technologies, Inc.
grew EPS 87. 7% year-over-year, compared to 0. 0% for Deere & Company. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — AQB or DE?
Deere & Company (DE) is the more profitable company, earning 11.
3% net margin versus 0. 0% for AquaBounty Technologies, Inc. — meaning it keeps 11. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: DE leads at 18. 8% versus 0. 0% for AQB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DE leads at 36. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — AQB or DE?
In this comparison, DE (1.
1% yield) pays a dividend. AQB does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is AQB or DE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Deere & Company (DE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
56), 1. 1% yield, +664. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (DE: +664. 1%, AQB: -99. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between AQB and DE?
These companies operate in different sectors (AQB (Consumer Defensive) and DE (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
DE pays a dividend while AQB does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.