Waste Management
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
AQMS vs CHNR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Waste Management
AQMS vs CHNR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Waste Management | Waste Management |
| Market Cap | $17M | $42M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-23M | $-14M |
| Total Debt | $592K | $0.00 |
| Cash & Equiv. | $11M | $3M |
AQMS vs CHNR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aqua Metals, Inc. (AQMS) | 100 | 3.1 | -96.9% |
| China Natural Resou… (CHNR) | 100 | 13.3 | -86.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AQMS vs CHNR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AQMS is the clearest fit if your priority is growth and quality.
- 7.6% revenue growth vs CHNR's -100.0%
- 1.2% margin vs CHNR's 0.0%
CHNR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.12
- Rev growth -100.0%, EPS growth 95.9%
- -93.5% 10Y total return vs AQMS's -99.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 7.6% revenue growth vs CHNR's -100.0% | |
| Quality / Margins | 1.2% margin vs CHNR's 0.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.12 vs AQMS's 2.26 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | -2.3% vs AQMS's -51.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -5.3% ROA vs AQMS's -157.5%, ROIC -0.0% vs -166.7% |
AQMS vs CHNR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CHNR leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AQMS and CHNR operate at a comparable scale, with $0 and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $0 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$22M | -$12M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$23M | -$14M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$11M | -$6M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +71.4% | +91.3% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — AQMS and CHNR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $17M | $42M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $7M | $41M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.34x | -88.68x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.52x | 3.21x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
CHNR leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CHNR delivers a -15.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-16 in annual profit, vs $-3 for AQMS. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AQMS scores 3/9 vs CHNR's 2/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.5% | -15.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -157.5% | -5.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -166.7% | -0.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -139.5% | -0.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.04x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$10M | -$3M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $11M | $3M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $592,000 | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -32.95x | -263.29x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CHNR leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CHNR five years ago would be worth $721 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $93 for AQMS. Over the past 12 months, CHNR leads with a -2.3% total return vs AQMS's -51.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CHNR at -41.2% vs AQMS's -71.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -3.6% | +22.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -51.5% | -2.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.7% | -79.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.1% | -92.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.7% | -93.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -71.6% | -41.2% |
Risk & Volatility
CHNR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CHNR is the less volatile stock with a 1.12 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AQMS's 2.26 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CHNR currently trades 52.4% from its 52-week high vs AQMS's 13.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.26x | 1.12x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $39.40 | $8.20 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.37 | $3.16 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +13.0% | +52.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 71.9 | 55.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 43K | 893K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
CHNR leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 1 category is tied.
AQMS vs CHNR: Frequently Asked Questions
7 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Which is the better long-term investment — AQMS or CHNR?
Over the past 5 years, China Natural Resources, Inc.
(CHNR) delivered a total return of -92. 8%, compared to -99. 1% for Aqua Metals, Inc. (AQMS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CHNR returned -93. 5% versus AQMS's -99. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
02Which is safer — AQMS or CHNR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), China Natural Resources, Inc.
(CHNR) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 12β versus Aqua Metals, Inc. 's 2. 26β — meaning AQMS is approximately 102% more volatile than CHNR relative to the S&P 500.
03Which is growing faster — AQMS or CHNR?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: China Natural Resources, Inc.
grew EPS 95. 9% year-over-year, compared to 60. 4% for Aqua Metals, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
04Which has better profit margins — AQMS or CHNR?
Aqua Metals, Inc.
(AQMS) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus 0. 0% for China Natural Resources, Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AQMS leads at 0. 0% versus 0. 0% for CHNR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AQMS leads at 0. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
05Which pays a better dividend — AQMS or CHNR?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
06Is AQMS or CHNR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, China Natural Resources, Inc.
(CHNR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 12)). Aqua Metals, Inc. (AQMS) carries a higher beta of 2. 26 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CHNR: -93. 5%, AQMS: -99. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
07What are the main differences between AQMS and CHNR?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.