Waste Management
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
AQMS vs RCUS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
AQMS vs RCUS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Waste Management | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $17M | $2.50B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $236M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-23M | $-369M |
| Gross Margin | — | 90.7% |
| Operating Margin | — | -168.6% |
| Total Debt | $592K | $99M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $11M | $222M |
AQMS vs RCUS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aqua Metals, Inc. (AQMS) | 100 | 3.1 | -96.9% |
| Arcus Biosciences, … (RCUS) | 100 | 79.1 | -20.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AQMS vs RCUS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AQMS is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- EPS growth 60.4%
- 7.6% revenue growth vs RCUS's -4.3%
- 1.2% margin vs RCUS's -156.4%
RCUS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- beta 1.95
- 45.9% 10Y total return vs AQMS's -99.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.95, Low D/E 15.7%, current ratio 4.36x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 7.6% revenue growth vs RCUS's -4.3% | |
| Quality / Margins | 1.2% margin vs RCUS's -156.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.95 vs AQMS's 2.26 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +209.6% vs AQMS's -51.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -35.3% ROA vs AQMS's -157.5%, ROIC -64.1% vs -166.7% |
AQMS vs RCUS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
AQMS vs RCUS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AQMS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RCUS and AQMS operate at a comparable scale, with $236M and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $236M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$22M | -$391M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$23M | -$369M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$11M | -$489M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +90.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | -168.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -156.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | -2.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -39.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +71.4% | +10.5% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — AQMS and RCUS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $17M | $2.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $7M | $2.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.34x | -7.54x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 10.11x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.52x | 4.22x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
RCUS leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
RCUS delivers a -69.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-69 in annual profit, vs $-3 for AQMS. AQMS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to RCUS's 0.16x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AQMS scores 3/9 vs RCUS's 0/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.5% | -69.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -157.5% | -35.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -166.7% | -64.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -139.5% | -42.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 0 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.04x | 0.16x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$10M | -$123M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $11M | $222M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $592,000 | $99M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -32.95x | -13.38x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
RCUS leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in RCUS five years ago would be worth $8,143 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $93 for AQMS. Over the past 12 months, RCUS leads with a +209.6% total return vs AQMS's -51.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors RCUS at 7.7% vs AQMS's -71.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -3.6% | +6.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -51.5% | +209.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.7% | +24.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.1% | -18.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.7% | +45.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -71.6% | +7.7% |
Risk & Volatility
RCUS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
RCUS is the less volatile stock with a 1.95 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AQMS's 2.26 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. RCUS currently trades 86.3% from its 52-week high vs AQMS's 13.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.26x | 1.95x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $39.40 | $28.72 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.37 | $7.06 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +13.0% | +86.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 71.9 | 60.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 43K | 1.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $30.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 18 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
RCUS leads in 3 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). AQMS leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 1 tied.
AQMS vs RCUS: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AQMS or RCUS a better buy right now?
Analysts rate Arcus Biosciences, Inc.
(RCUS) a "Buy" — based on 18 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — AQMS or RCUS?
Over the past 5 years, Arcus Biosciences, Inc.
(RCUS) delivered a total return of -18. 6%, compared to -99. 1% for Aqua Metals, Inc. (AQMS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RCUS returned +45. 9% versus AQMS's -99. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — AQMS or RCUS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Arcus Biosciences, Inc.
(RCUS) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 95β versus Aqua Metals, Inc. 's 2. 26β — meaning AQMS is approximately 16% more volatile than RCUS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Aqua Metals, Inc. (AQMS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 16% for Arcus Biosciences, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — AQMS or RCUS?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Aqua Metals, Inc.
grew EPS 60. 4% year-over-year, compared to -4. 8% for Arcus Biosciences, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — AQMS or RCUS?
Aqua Metals, Inc.
(AQMS) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -142. 9% for Arcus Biosciences, Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AQMS leads at 0. 0% versus -156. 3% for RCUS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RCUS leads at 96. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — AQMS or RCUS?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is AQMS or RCUS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Arcus Biosciences, Inc.
(RCUS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. Aqua Metals, Inc. (AQMS) carries a higher beta of 2. 26 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (RCUS: +45. 9%, AQMS: -99. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between AQMS and RCUS?
These companies operate in different sectors (AQMS (Industrials) and RCUS (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.