Software - Infrastructure
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
ARAI vs INVZ
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Auto - Parts
ARAI vs INVZ — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Infrastructure | Auto - Parts |
| Market Cap | $24M | $117M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $98K | $55M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-10M | $-68M |
| Gross Margin | 38.9% | 23.4% |
| Operating Margin | -99.8% | -123.0% |
| Total Debt | $19K | $65M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $129K | $9M |
ARAI vs INVZ — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 25 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arrive AI Inc. (ARAI) | 100 | 11.8 | -88.2% |
| Innoviz Technologie… (INVZ) | 100 | 76.2 | -23.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ARAI vs INVZ
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
In this particular matchup, ARAI is outpaced on most metrics by others in the set.
INVZ carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 2.69
- Rev growth 127.0%, EPS growth 40.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 109.1%
- -92.9% 10Y total return vs ARAI's -94.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Quality / Margins | -123.1% margin vs ARAI's -104.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 2.69 vs ARAI's 3.80 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | -3.9% vs ARAI's -94.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -49.0% ROA vs ARAI's -150.3% |
ARAI vs INVZ — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
INVZ leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
INVZ is the larger business by revenue, generating $55M annually — 561.1x ARAI's $98,175. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from -123.1% (INVZ) to -104.3% (ARAI).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $98,175 | $55M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$10M | -$62M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$10M | -$68M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$5M | -$52M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +38.9% | +23.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -99.8% | -123.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -104.3% | -123.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -56.0% | -94.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +110.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -154.5% | +9.1% |
Valuation Metrics
ARAI leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $24M | $117M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $23M | $173M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -4.59x | -2.04x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 2.13x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 1.78x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — ARAI and INVZ each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
INVZ delivers a -87.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-87 in annual profit, vs $-3 for ARAI. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), INVZ scores 5/9 vs ARAI's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -3.1% | -87.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -150.3% | -49.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | -46.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | -64.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.83x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$110,236 | $56M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $129,318 | $9M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $19,082 | $65M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -12.23x | -39.12x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
INVZ leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in INVZ five years ago would be worth $699 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $519 for ARAI. Over the past 12 months, INVZ leads with a -3.9% total return vs ARAI's -94.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors INVZ at -35.2% vs ARAI's -62.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -74.6% | -28.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -94.8% | -3.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -94.8% | -72.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -94.8% | -93.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -94.8% | -92.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -62.7% | -35.2% |
Risk & Volatility
INVZ leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
INVZ is the less volatile stock with a 2.69 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ARAI's 3.80 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. INVZ currently trades 27.3% from its 52-week high vs ARAI's 1.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 3.80x | 2.69x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $40.00 | $2.54 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.51 | $0.58 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +1.7% | +27.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 43.1 | 59.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 11.0M | 2.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $2.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 5 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
INVZ leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). ARAI leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
ARAI vs INVZ: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ARAI or INVZ a better buy right now?
Analysts rate Innoviz Technologies Ltd.
(INVZ) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — ARAI or INVZ?
Over the past 5 years, Innoviz Technologies Ltd.
(INVZ) delivered a total return of -93. 0%, compared to -94. 8% for Arrive AI Inc. (ARAI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: INVZ returned -92. 9% versus ARAI's -94. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — ARAI or INVZ?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Innoviz Technologies Ltd.
(INVZ) is the lower-risk stock at 2. 69β versus Arrive AI Inc. 's 3. 80β — meaning ARAI is approximately 41% more volatile than INVZ relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — ARAI or INVZ?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Innoviz Technologies Ltd.
grew EPS 40. 4% year-over-year, compared to 37. 5% for Arrive AI Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — ARAI or INVZ?
Innoviz Technologies Ltd.
(INVZ) is the more profitable company, earning -123. 1% net margin versus -104. 3% for Arrive AI Inc. — meaning it keeps -123. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: INVZ leads at -123. 0% versus -99. 8% for ARAI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ARAI leads at 38. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — ARAI or INVZ?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is ARAI or INVZ better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Innoviz Technologies Ltd.
(INVZ) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. Arrive AI Inc. (ARAI) carries a higher beta of 3. 80 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (INVZ: -92. 9%, ARAI: -94. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between ARAI and INVZ?
These companies operate in different sectors (ARAI (Technology) and INVZ (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: ARAI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; INVZ is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.