Asset Management - Cryptocurrency
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
ARBKL vs CIFR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Capital Markets
ARBKL vs CIFR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Asset Management - Cryptocurrency | Financial - Capital Markets |
| Market Cap | — | $8.40B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $47M | $224M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-55M | $-898M |
| Gross Margin | 33.2% | 28.4% |
| Operating Margin | -32.6% | -150.7% |
| Total Debt | $40M | $2.77B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $9M | $628M |
ARBKL vs CIFR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Nov 21 | Dec 25 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Argo Blockchain plc… (ARBKL) | 100 | 21.9 | -78.1% |
| Cipher Mining Inc. (CIFR) | 100 | 257.9 | +157.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ARBKL vs CIFR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ARBKL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 1.69
- Lower volatility, beta 1.69, current ratio 1.24x
- Beta 1.69, current ratio 1.24x
CIFR is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 48.0%, EPS growth -14.4%
- 108.9% 10Y total return vs ARBKL's -44.9%
- 48.0% NII/revenue growth vs ARBKL's -7.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 48.0% NII/revenue growth vs ARBKL's -7.0% | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.7% vs CIFR's 1.8% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.69 vs CIFR's 3.87 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +5.8% vs ARBKL's -5.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.7% vs CIFR's 1.8% |
ARBKL vs CIFR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
ARBKL vs CIFR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ARBKL leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CIFR is the larger business by revenue, generating $224M annually — 4.8x ARBKL's $47M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from -117.2% (ARBKL) to -3.7% (CIFR).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $47M | $224M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$132,000 | -$203M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$55M | -$898M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$45M | -$930M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +33.2% | +28.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -32.6% | -150.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -117.2% | -3.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -95.3% | -3.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -26.2% | -154.5% |
Valuation Metrics
ARBKL leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | — | $8.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | — | $10.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -58.50x | -9.62x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 37.49x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 9.44x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — ARBKL and CIFR each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | -115.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -2.9% | -24.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -31.3% | -11.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -52.7% | -15.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 3.31x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $32M | $2.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $9M | $628M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $40M | $2.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -3.08x | -32.12x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CIFR leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CIFR five years ago would be worth $20,789 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,511 for ARBKL. Over the past 12 months, CIFR leads with a +584.9% total return vs ARBKL's -5.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CIFR at 119.7% vs ARBKL's 15.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | — | +27.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -5.3% | +584.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +54.9% | +960.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -44.9% | +107.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -44.9% | +108.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +15.7% | +119.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ARBKL and CIFR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ARBKL is the less volatile stock with a 1.69 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CIFR's 3.87 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CIFR currently trades 81.1% from its 52-week high vs ARBKL's 75.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.69x | 3.87x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $7.00 | $25.52 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.04 | $2.95 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +75.7% | +81.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 61.3 | 67.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 5.1M | 24.9M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $27.86 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 12 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | — | +1.1% |
ARBKL leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). CIFR leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
ARBKL vs CIFR: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ARBKL or CIFR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Cipher Mining Inc.
(CIFR) is the stronger pick with 48. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -7. 0% for Argo Blockchain plc 8. 75% Senior Notes due 2026 (ARBKL). Analysts rate Cipher Mining Inc. (CIFR) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — ARBKL or CIFR?
Over the past 5 years, Cipher Mining Inc.
(CIFR) delivered a total return of +107. 9%, compared to -44. 9% for Argo Blockchain plc 8. 75% Senior Notes due 2026 (ARBKL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CIFR returned +108. 9% versus ARBKL's -44. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — ARBKL or CIFR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Argo Blockchain plc 8.
75% Senior Notes due 2026 (ARBKL) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 69β versus Cipher Mining Inc. 's 3. 87β — meaning CIFR is approximately 129% more volatile than ARBKL relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — ARBKL or CIFR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Cipher Mining Inc.
(CIFR) is pulling ahead at 48. 0% versus -7. 0% for Argo Blockchain plc 8. 75% Senior Notes due 2026 (ARBKL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Argo Blockchain plc 8. 75% Senior Notes due 2026 grew EPS -30. 4% year-over-year, compared to -1435. 7% for Cipher Mining Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — ARBKL or CIFR?
Argo Blockchain plc 8.
75% Senior Notes due 2026 (ARBKL) is the more profitable company, earning -117. 2% net margin versus -367. 2% for Cipher Mining Inc. — meaning it keeps -117. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ARBKL leads at -32. 6% versus -150. 7% for CIFR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ARBKL leads at 33. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — ARBKL or CIFR?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is ARBKL or CIFR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Argo Blockchain plc 8.
75% Senior Notes due 2026 (ARBKL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. Cipher Mining Inc. (CIFR) carries a higher beta of 3. 87 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ARBKL: -44. 9%, CIFR: +108. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between ARBKL and CIFR?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: ARBKL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CIFR is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.
Compare ARBKL vs MARA
MARA is one of the most direct listed alternatives to ARBKL.
Compare CIFR vs MARA
MARA is one of the most direct listed alternatives to CIFR.
Expand With MARA + RIOT
MARA and RIOT are the strongest missing peers across the current compare set.