Asset Management - Cryptocurrency
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
ARBKL vs HUT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Capital Markets
ARBKL vs HUT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Asset Management - Cryptocurrency | Financial - Capital Markets |
| Market Cap | — | $11.22B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $47M | $15M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-55M | $-312M |
| Gross Margin | 33.2% | -6.1% |
| Operating Margin | -32.6% | -21.0% |
| Total Debt | $40M | $429M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $9M | $45M |
ARBKL vs HUT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Nov 21 | Dec 25 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Argo Blockchain plc… (ARBKL) | 100 | 21.9 | -78.1% |
| Hut 8 Corp. (HUT) | 100 | 74.7 | -25.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ARBKL vs HUT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ARBKL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 1.69
- Rev growth -7.0%, EPS growth -30.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.69, current ratio 1.24x
HUT is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 462.4% 10Y total return vs ARBKL's -44.9%
- +7.0% vs ARBKL's -5.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -7.0% NII/revenue growth vs HUT's -90.7% | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.7% vs HUT's 14.9% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.69 vs HUT's 4.51 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +7.0% vs ARBKL's -5.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.7% vs HUT's 14.9% |
ARBKL vs HUT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
ARBKL vs HUT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ARBKL leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ARBKL is the larger business by revenue, generating $47M annually — 3.1x HUT's $15M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from -117.2% (ARBKL) to -15.0% (HUT).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $47M | $15M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$132,000 | -$389M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$55M | -$312M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$45M | -$892M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +33.2% | -6.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -32.6% | -21.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -117.2% | -15.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -95.3% | -22.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -26.2% | -52.3% |
Valuation Metrics
ARBKL leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | — | $11.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | — | $11.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -58.50x | -47.28x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 743.95x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 6.31x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
ARBKL leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ARBKL scores 3/9 vs HUT's 2/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | -17.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -2.9% | -11.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -31.3% | -13.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -52.7% | -17.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.25x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $32M | $384M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $9M | $45M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $40M | $429M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -3.08x | -9.18x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HUT leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HUT five years ago would be worth $39,601 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,511 for ARBKL. Over the past 12 months, HUT leads with a +699.2% total return vs ARBKL's -5.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HUT at 124.4% vs ARBKL's 15.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | — | +97.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -5.3% | +699.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +54.9% | +1030.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -44.9% | +296.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -44.9% | +462.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +15.7% | +124.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ARBKL and HUT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ARBKL is the less volatile stock with a 1.69 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HUT's 4.51 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HUT currently trades 90.9% from its 52-week high vs ARBKL's 75.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.69x | 4.51x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $7.00 | $111.33 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.04 | $12.45 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +75.7% | +90.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 61.3 | 82.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 5.1M | 4.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $78.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 15 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | — | 0.0% |
ARBKL leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). HUT leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
ARBKL vs HUT: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ARBKL or HUT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Argo Blockchain plc 8.
75% Senior Notes due 2026 (ARBKL) is the stronger pick with -7. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -90. 7% for Hut 8 Corp. (HUT). Analysts rate Hut 8 Corp. (HUT) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — ARBKL or HUT?
Over the past 5 years, Hut 8 Corp.
(HUT) delivered a total return of +296. 0%, compared to -44. 9% for Argo Blockchain plc 8. 75% Senior Notes due 2026 (ARBKL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HUT returned +462. 4% versus ARBKL's -44. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — ARBKL or HUT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Argo Blockchain plc 8.
75% Senior Notes due 2026 (ARBKL) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 69β versus Hut 8 Corp. 's 4. 51β — meaning HUT is approximately 166% more volatile than ARBKL relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — ARBKL or HUT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Argo Blockchain plc 8.
75% Senior Notes due 2026 (ARBKL) is pulling ahead at -7. 0% versus -90. 7% for Hut 8 Corp. (HUT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Argo Blockchain plc 8. 75% Senior Notes due 2026 grew EPS -30. 4% year-over-year, compared to -162. 9% for Hut 8 Corp.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — ARBKL or HUT?
Argo Blockchain plc 8.
75% Senior Notes due 2026 (ARBKL) is the more profitable company, earning -117. 2% net margin versus -1499. 6% for Hut 8 Corp. — meaning it keeps -117. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ARBKL leads at -32. 6% versus -21. 0% for HUT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ARBKL leads at 33. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — ARBKL or HUT?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is ARBKL or HUT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Hut 8 Corp.
(HUT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+462. 4% 10Y return). Argo Blockchain plc 8. 75% Senior Notes due 2026 (ARBKL) carries a higher beta of 1. 69 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (HUT: +462. 4%, ARBKL: -44. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between ARBKL and HUT?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.