Asset Management
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
ARCC vs OBDC vs JPM vs BAC vs GBDC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Credit Services
Banks - Diversified
Banks - Diversified
Asset Management
ARCC vs OBDC vs JPM vs BAC vs GBDC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Asset Management | Financial - Credit Services | Banks - Diversified | Banks - Diversified | Asset Management |
| Market Cap | $12.95B | $5.40B | $908.57B | $424.14B | $3.22B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.63B | $1.31B | $280.33B | $191.57B | $761M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1.15B | $360M | $57.05B | $30.51B | $205M |
| Gross Margin | 70.8% | 63.7% | 60.0% | 56.1% | 75.4% |
| Operating Margin | 66.2% | 49.7% | 25.9% | 19.7% | 57.1% |
| Forward P/E | 9.4x | 8.4x | 14.6x | 12.6x | 9.0x |
| Total Debt | $15.99B | $9.30B | $942.38B | $365.90B | $4.90B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $924M | $10M | $343.34B | $231.84B | $24M |
ARCC vs OBDC vs JPM vs BAC vs GBDC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ares Capital Corpor… (ARCC) | 100 | 124.8 | +24.8% |
| Blue Owl Capital Co… (OBDC) | 100 | 88.2 | -11.8% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 345.8 | +245.8% |
| Bank of America Cor… (BAC) | 100 | 236.6 | +136.6% |
| Golub Capital BDC, … (GBDC) | 100 | 106.0 | +6.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ARCC vs OBDC vs JPM vs BAC vs GBDC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ARCC lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
OBDC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and bank quality.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.77, yield 13.7%
- NIM 7.3% vs BAC's 1.8%
- 52.6% NII/revenue growth vs BAC's -0.5%
- Lower P/E (8.4x vs 12.6x)
JPM is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 481.2% 10Y total return vs BAC's 371.6%
BAC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum is your priority.
- +27.2% vs OBDC's -15.2%
GBDC ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 42.5%, EPS growth 4.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.56, current ratio 5.35x
- PEG 0.29 vs OBDC's 1.91
- Beta 0.56, yield 11.2%, current ratio 5.35x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 52.6% NII/revenue growth vs BAC's -0.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.4x vs 12.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.0% vs BAC's 0.4% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.56 vs JPM's 0.87, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 13.7% yield, vs JPM's 1.8% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +27.2% vs OBDC's -15.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.0% vs BAC's 0.4% |
ARCC vs OBDC vs JPM vs BAC vs GBDC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
ARCC vs OBDC vs JPM vs BAC vs GBDC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ARCC leads in 2 of 6 categories
JPM leads 1 • OBDC leads 0 • BAC leads 0 • GBDC leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ARCC leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 368.2x GBDC's $761M. ARCC is the more profitable business, keeping 43.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BAC's 15.9%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.6B | $1.3B | $280.3B | $191.6B | $761M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $2.0B | $650M | $81.4B | $40.0B | $431M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.1B | $360M | $57.0B | $30.5B | $205M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.1B | $1.1B | $100.9B | $12.6B | $313M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +70.8% | +63.7% | +60.0% | +56.1% | +75.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +66.2% | +49.7% | +25.9% | +19.7% | +57.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +43.7% | +27.5% | +20.4% | +15.9% | +26.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +43.5% | +82.2% | +36.0% | +6.6% | +41.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -63.9% | -110.2% | +16.0% | +18.3% | -160.0% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — OBDC and GBDC each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.7x trailing earnings, GBDC trades at a 46% valuation discount to JPM's 16.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), GBDC offers better value at 0.28x vs OBDC's 1.99x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $12.9B | $5.4B | $908.6B | $424.1B | $3.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $28.0B | $14.7B | $1.51T | $558.2B | $8.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 9.69x | 8.77x | 16.22x | 14.71x | 8.70x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.41x | 8.42x | 14.60x | 12.60x | 8.99x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.94x | 1.99x | 0.92x | 0.96x | 0.28x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 12.79x | 11.85x | 18.52x | 13.95x | 11.77x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.12x | 3.22x | 3.25x | 2.21x | 3.69x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.88x | 0.74x | 2.51x | 1.40x | 0.82x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 11.34x | 3.10x | 9.01x | 33.63x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
ARCC leads this category, winning 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
JPM delivers a 15.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $5 for OBDC. ARCC carries lower financial leverage with a 1.12x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BAC scores 7/9 vs GBDC's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +8.1% | +4.8% | +15.9% | +10.1% | +5.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.8% | +2.1% | +1.3% | +0.9% | +2.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.7% | +6.1% | +4.5% | +3.5% | +5.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.5% | +7.9% | +8.9% | +4.5% | +7.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 7 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.12x | 1.26x | 2.60x | 1.21x | 1.23x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $15.1B | $9.3B | $599.0B | $134.1B | $4.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $924M | $10M | $343.3B | $231.8B | $24M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $16.0B | $9.3B | $942.4B | $365.9B | $4.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.98x | 1.16x | 0.74x | 0.48x | 1.62x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $23,548 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,918 for OBDC. Over the past 12 months, BAC leads with a +27.2% total return vs OBDC's -15.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JPM at 33.7% vs OBDC's 4.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -7.1% | -10.5% | +0.8% | +1.4% | -4.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -7.3% | -15.2% | +20.9% | +27.2% | -6.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +28.3% | +14.5% | +138.8% | +105.5% | +29.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +44.4% | +29.2% | +135.5% | +57.4% | +30.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +150.1% | +37.6% | +481.2% | +371.6% | +52.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +8.7% | +4.6% | +33.7% | +27.1% | +8.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BAC and GBDC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GBDC is the less volatile stock with a 0.56 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than JPM's 0.87 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BAC currently trades 96.9% from its 52-week high vs OBDC's 71.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.65x | 0.77x | 0.87x | 0.83x | 0.56x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $23.42 | $15.19 | $338.09 | $57.98 | $15.63 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $17.40 | $10.52 | $269.72 | $44.21 | $11.77 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +77.0% | +71.6% | +96.2% | +96.9% | +79.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 35.6 | 40.1 | 72.1 | 70.9 | 34.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 5.4M | 3.7M | 7.4M | 32.4M | 1.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — OBDC and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ARCC as "Buy", OBDC as "Buy", JPM as "Buy", BAC as "Buy", GBDC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 19.6% upside for OBDC (target: $13) vs 4.5% for JPM (target: $340). For income investors, OBDC offers the higher dividend yield at 13.68% vs JPM's 1.83%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $19.00 | $13.00 | $339.75 | $61.13 | $14.25 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 32 | 13 | 61 | 54 | 12 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.1% | +13.7% | +1.8% | +2.3% | +11.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 15 | 12 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.38 | $1.49 | $5.95 | $1.27 | $1.38 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +2.7% | +3.8% | +5.1% | +2.4% |
ARCC leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). JPM leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.
ARCC vs OBDC vs JPM vs BAC vs GBDC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ARCC or OBDC or JPM or BAC or GBDC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Blue Owl Capital Corporation (OBDC) is the stronger pick with 52.
6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 5% for Bank of America Corporation (BAC). Golub Capital BDC, Inc. (GBDC) offers the better valuation at 8. 7x trailing P/E (9. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC) a "Buy" — based on 32 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ARCC or OBDC or JPM or BAC or GBDC?
On trailing P/E, Golub Capital BDC, Inc.
(GBDC) is the cheapest at 8. 7x versus JPMorgan Chase & Co. at 16. 2x. On forward P/E, Blue Owl Capital Corporation is actually cheaper at 8. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Golub Capital BDC, Inc. wins at 0. 29x versus Blue Owl Capital Corporation's 1. 91x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ARCC or OBDC or JPM or BAC or GBDC?
Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) delivered a total return of +135. 5%, compared to +29. 2% for Blue Owl Capital Corporation (OBDC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +481. 2% versus OBDC's +37. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ARCC or OBDC or JPM or BAC or GBDC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Golub Capital BDC, Inc.
(GBDC) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 56β versus JPMorgan Chase & Co. 's 0. 87β — meaning JPM is approximately 55% more volatile than GBDC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 112% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ARCC or OBDC or JPM or BAC or GBDC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Blue Owl Capital Corporation (OBDC) is pulling ahead at 52.
6% versus -0. 5% for Bank of America Corporation (BAC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Bank of America Corporation grew EPS 18. 6% year-over-year, compared to -23. 8% for Ares Capital Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ARCC or OBDC or JPM or BAC or GBDC?
Golub Capital BDC, Inc.
(GBDC) is the more profitable company, earning 43. 2% net margin versus 15. 9% for Bank of America Corporation — meaning it keeps 43. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GBDC leads at 78. 9% versus 19. 7% for BAC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GBDC leads at 81. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ARCC or OBDC or JPM or BAC or GBDC more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Golub Capital BDC, Inc. (GBDC) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 29x versus Blue Owl Capital Corporation's 1. 91x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Blue Owl Capital Corporation (OBDC) trades at 8. 4x forward P/E versus 14. 6x for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — 6. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for OBDC: 19. 6% to $13. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — ARCC or OBDC or JPM or BAC or GBDC?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Blue Owl Capital Corporation (OBDC) offers the highest yield at 13. 7%, versus 1. 8% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM).
09Is ARCC or OBDC or JPM or BAC or GBDC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 87), 1. 8% yield, +481. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (JPM: +481. 2%, OBDC: +37. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ARCC and OBDC and JPM and BAC and GBDC?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: ARCC is a mid-cap high-growth stock; OBDC is a small-cap high-growth stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock; BAC is a large-cap deep-value stock; GBDC is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.