Restaurants
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
ARCO vs JACK vs QSR vs WEN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Restaurants
Restaurants
Restaurants
ARCO vs JACK vs QSR vs WEN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Restaurants | Restaurants | Restaurants | Restaurants |
| Market Cap | $1.18B | $264M | $27.62B | $1.39B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4.68B | $1.35B | $9.59B | $1.88B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $212M | $-69M | $955M | $171M |
| Gross Margin | 12.3% | 27.6% | 33.1% | 24.9% |
| Operating Margin | 7.5% | -2.8% | 25.1% | 13.4% |
| Forward P/E | 13.0x | 4.0x | 19.6x | 12.7x |
| Total Debt | $2.25B | $3.12B | $17.58B | $4.15B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $373M | $52M | $1.16B | $301M |
ARCO vs JACK vs QSR vs WEN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arcos Dorados Holdi… (ARCO) | 100 | 235.5 | +135.5% |
| Jack in the Box Inc. (JACK) | 100 | 20.6 | -79.4% |
| Restaurant Brands I… (QSR) | 100 | 146.1 | +46.1% |
| The Wendy's Company (WEN) | 100 | 34.3 | -65.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ARCO vs JACK vs QSR vs WEN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ARCO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if efficiency is your priority.
- 5.9% ROA vs JACK's -2.7%, ROIC 11.1% vs -0.6%
JACK is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (4.0x vs 19.6x)
QSR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 14 yrs, beta 0.35, yield 3.0%
- Rev growth 12.2%, EPS growth -26.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 13.2%
- 133.5% 10Y total return vs ARCO's 131.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.35, current ratio 0.98x
WEN is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency and defensive.
- PEG 1.23 vs QSR's 2.46
- Beta 0.51, yield 9.1%, current ratio 1.76x
- 9.1% yield, vs QSR's 3.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 12.2% revenue growth vs JACK's -6.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (4.0x vs 19.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 10.0% margin vs JACK's -5.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.35 vs JACK's 1.71 | |
| Dividends | 9.1% yield, vs QSR's 3.0% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +21.8% vs JACK's -49.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.9% ROA vs JACK's -2.7%, ROIC 11.1% vs -0.6% |
ARCO vs JACK vs QSR vs WEN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
ARCO vs JACK vs QSR vs WEN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
QSR leads in 3 of 6 categories
JACK leads 1 • ARCO leads 1 • WEN leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
QSR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
QSR is the larger business by revenue, generating $9.6B annually — 7.1x JACK's $1.3B. QSR is the more profitable business, keeping 10.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to JACK's -5.2%. On growth, ARCO holds the edge at +10.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4.7B | $1.3B | $9.6B | $1.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $547M | $16M | $2.6B | $422M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $212M | -$69M | $955M | $171M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $11M | -$10M | $1.5B | $222M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +12.3% | +27.6% | +33.1% | +24.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +7.5% | -2.8% | +25.1% | +13.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +4.5% | -5.2% | +10.0% | +9.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +0.2% | -0.7% | +15.8% | +11.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +10.7% | -25.5% | +7.3% | -56.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -57.1% | +33.7% | +102.1% | -36.8% |
Valuation Metrics
JACK leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.6x trailing earnings, WEN trades at a 75% valuation discount to QSR's 33.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), WEN offers better value at 0.83x vs QSR's 4.24x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.2B | $264M | $27.6B | $1.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.1B | $3.3B | $44.0B | $5.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 8.93x | -3.28x | 33.92x | 8.59x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 13.03x | 4.02x | 19.62x | 12.72x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 4.24x | 0.83x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 5.57x | 82.88x | 17.89x | 10.40x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.25x | 0.18x | 2.93x | 0.64x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.46x | — | 7.06x | 12.07x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 3.56x | 19.06x | 5.73x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ARCO leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
WEN delivers a 150.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $151 in annual profit, vs $18 for QSR. ARCO carries lower financial leverage with a 2.91x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WEN's 35.31x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), QSR scores 6/9 vs WEN's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +32.4% | — | +18.4% | +150.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.9% | -2.7% | +3.8% | +3.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +11.1% | -0.6% | +8.2% | +6.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +13.5% | -0.8% | +9.9% | +7.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 | 6 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.91x | — | 3.41x | 35.31x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.9B | $3.1B | $16.4B | $3.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $373M | $52M | $1.2B | $301M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2.2B | $3.1B | $17.6B | $4.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 8.64x | -0.51x | 3.65x | 4.39x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
QSR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ARCO five years ago would be worth $15,831 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,698 for JACK. Over the past 12 months, QSR leads with a +21.8% total return vs JACK's -49.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors QSR at 6.2% vs JACK's -42.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +24.7% | -26.3% | +18.5% | -8.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +16.2% | -49.3% | +21.8% | -35.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +16.3% | -81.2% | +19.8% | -56.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +58.3% | -83.0% | +31.9% | -51.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +131.8% | -59.6% | +133.5% | +14.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +5.2% | -42.8% | +6.2% | -24.4% |
Risk & Volatility
QSR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
QSR is the less volatile stock with a 0.35 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than JACK's 1.71 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. QSR currently trades 97.3% from its 52-week high vs JACK's 46.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.02x | 1.71x | 0.35x | 0.51x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $9.75 | $29.40 | $81.96 | $12.52 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $6.51 | $8.91 | $61.33 | $6.37 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +92.5% | +46.9% | +97.3% | +58.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.2 | 60.0 | 53.4 | 51.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.1M | 838K | 3.3M | 8.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — QSR and WEN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ARCO as "Buy", JACK as "Hold", QSR as "Buy", WEN as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 44.5% upside for JACK (target: $20) vs 5.0% for QSR (target: $84). For income investors, WEN offers the higher dividend yield at 9.15% vs ARCO's 2.66%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $11.53 | $19.92 | $83.73 | $7.73 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 12 | 41 | 44 | 51 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.7% | +6.3% | +3.0% | +9.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 4 | 0 | 14 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.24 | $0.87 | $2.42 | $0.67 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.9% | 0.0% | +14.4% |
QSR leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). JACK leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
ARCO vs JACK vs QSR vs WEN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ARCO or JACK or QSR or WEN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Restaurant Brands International Inc.
(QSR) is the stronger pick with 12. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -6. 7% for Jack in the Box Inc. (JACK). The Wendy's Company (WEN) offers the better valuation at 8. 6x trailing P/E (12. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Arcos Dorados Holdings Inc. (ARCO) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ARCO or JACK or QSR or WEN?
On trailing P/E, The Wendy's Company (WEN) is the cheapest at 8.
6x versus Restaurant Brands International Inc. at 33. 9x. On forward P/E, Jack in the Box Inc. is actually cheaper at 4. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: The Wendy's Company wins at 1. 23x versus Restaurant Brands International Inc. 's 2. 46x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ARCO or JACK or QSR or WEN?
Over the past 5 years, Arcos Dorados Holdings Inc.
(ARCO) delivered a total return of +58. 3%, compared to -83. 0% for Jack in the Box Inc. (JACK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: QSR returned +133. 5% versus JACK's -59. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ARCO or JACK or QSR or WEN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Restaurant Brands International Inc.
(QSR) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 35β versus Jack in the Box Inc. 's 1. 71β — meaning JACK is approximately 395% more volatile than QSR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Arcos Dorados Holdings Inc. (ARCO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 35% for The Wendy's Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ARCO or JACK or QSR or WEN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Restaurant Brands International Inc.
(QSR) is pulling ahead at 12. 2% versus -6. 7% for Jack in the Box Inc. (JACK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Arcos Dorados Holdings Inc. grew EPS 42. 3% year-over-year, compared to -127. 6% for Jack in the Box Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, QSR leads at 13. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ARCO or JACK or QSR or WEN?
Restaurant Brands International Inc.
(QSR) is the more profitable company, earning 8. 2% net margin versus -5. 5% for Jack in the Box Inc. — meaning it keeps 8. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: QSR leads at 23. 7% versus -1. 2% for JACK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — QSR leads at 41. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ARCO or JACK or QSR or WEN more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, The Wendy's Company (WEN) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 23x versus Restaurant Brands International Inc. 's 2. 46x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Jack in the Box Inc. (JACK) trades at 4. 0x forward P/E versus 19. 6x for Restaurant Brands International Inc. — 15. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for JACK: 44. 5% to $19. 92.
08Which pays a better dividend — ARCO or JACK or QSR or WEN?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
The Wendy's Company (WEN) offers the highest yield at 9. 1%, versus 2. 7% for Arcos Dorados Holdings Inc. (ARCO).
09Is ARCO or JACK or QSR or WEN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Restaurant Brands International Inc.
(QSR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 35), 3. 0% yield, +133. 5% 10Y return). Jack in the Box Inc. (JACK) carries a higher beta of 1. 71 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (QSR: +133. 5%, JACK: -59. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ARCO and JACK and QSR and WEN?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: ARCO is a small-cap deep-value stock; JACK is a small-cap income-oriented stock; QSR is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; WEN is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.