REIT - Office
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
ARE vs ONCO vs CTRE vs CRVS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
REIT - Healthcare Facilities
Biotechnology
ARE vs ONCO vs CTRE vs CRVS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Office | Biotechnology | REIT - Healthcare Facilities | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $7.89B | $1M | $8.82B | $1.23B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.90B | $815K | $468M | $0.00 |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-1.02B | $-14M | $335M | $-44M |
| Gross Margin | 68.2% | 77.6% | 86.8% | — |
| Operating Margin | -42.8% | -21.9% | 69.1% | — |
| Forward P/E | 61.0x | — | 28.0x | — |
| Total Debt | $12.76B | $49K | $894M | $937K |
| Cash & Equiv. | $549M | $5M | $198M | $5M |
ARE vs ONCO vs CTRE vs CRVS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Feb 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alexandria Real Est… (ARE) | 100 | 24.4 | -75.6% |
| Onconetix, Inc. (ONCO) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
| CareTrust REIT, Inc. (CTRE) | 100 | 237.7 | +137.7% |
| Corvus Pharmaceutic… (CRVS) | 100 | 878.5 | +778.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ARE vs ONCO vs CTRE vs CRVS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ARE is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.95, yield 11.7%
ONCO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if dividends is your priority.
- 30.9% yield, vs ARE's 11.7%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
CTRE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 108.8%, EPS growth 96.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 36.5%
- 265.1% 10Y total return vs CRVS's 17.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.14, Low D/E 22.1%, current ratio 1.54x
- Beta 0.14, yield 3.2%, current ratio 1.54x
CRVS is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +355.9% vs ONCO's -98.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 108.8% FFO/revenue growth vs ONCO's -67.7% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 71.5% margin vs ONCO's -17.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.14 vs CRVS's 1.63 | |
| Dividends | 30.9% yield, vs ARE's 11.7%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +355.9% vs ONCO's -98.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.7% ROA vs ONCO's -68.0%, ROIC 6.1% vs -32.8% |
ARE vs ONCO vs CTRE vs CRVS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
ARE vs ONCO vs CTRE vs CRVS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CTRE leads in 3 of 6 categories
CRVS leads 1 • ARE leads 0 • ONCO leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CTRE leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ARE and CRVS operate at a comparable scale, with $2.9B and $0 in trailing revenue. CTRE is the more profitable business, keeping 71.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ONCO's -17.2%. On growth, CTRE holds the edge at +99.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.9B | $815,371 | $468M | $0 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $74M | -$18M | $428M | -$48M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$1.0B | -$14M | $335M | -$44M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.4B | -$10M | $400M | -$35M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +68.2% | +77.6% | +86.8% | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -42.8% | -21.9% | +69.1% | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -35.3% | -17.2% | +71.5% | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +48.4% | -11.9% | +85.5% | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -9.7% | -57.4% | +99.3% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +31.9% | +120.9% | +2.9% | -15.4% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — ONCO and CTRE each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, CTRE's 23.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ARE's 135.6x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $7.9B | $1M | $8.8B | $1.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $20.1B | -$4M | $9.5B | $1.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -5.40x | -0.09x | 25.17x | -27.53x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 61.01x | — | 27.98x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 1.19x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 135.65x | — | 23.03x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.66x | 1.70x | 18.51x | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.41x | 0.08x | 2.00x | 19.01x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 5.58x | — | 23.27x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
CTRE leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CTRE delivers a 8.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $9 in annual profit, vs $-190 for ONCO. ONCO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ARE's 0.67x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ARE scores 5/9 vs CRVS's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -5.0% | -189.8% | +8.6% | -38.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -2.9% | -68.0% | +6.7% | -35.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -2.7% | -32.8% | +6.1% | -78.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -3.6% | -49.4% | +7.7% | -90.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.67x | 0.00x | 0.22x | 0.02x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $12.2B | -$5M | $696M | -$4M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $549M | $5M | $198M | $5M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $12.8B | $48,774 | $894M | $937,000 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -4.37x | -26.95x | 8.44x | -18.29x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CRVS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CRVS five years ago would be worth $50,137 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $0 for ONCO. Over the past 12 months, CRVS leads with a +355.9% total return vs ONCO's -98.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CRVS at 123.9% vs ONCO's -97.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -5.5% | -95.0% | +9.9% | +99.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -30.9% | -98.6% | +40.3% | +355.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -51.0% | -100.0% | +117.8% | +1022.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -61.1% | -100.0% | +96.6% | +401.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -8.6% | -100.0% | +265.1% | +17.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -21.2% | -97.2% | +29.6% | +123.9% |
Risk & Volatility
CTRE leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CTRE is the less volatile stock with a 0.14 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CRVS's 1.63 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CTRE currently trades 94.7% from its 52-week high vs ONCO's 0.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.99x | 1.28x | 0.20x | 1.57x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $88.24 | $74.30 | $41.72 | $26.95 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $39.41 | $0.37 | $27.72 | $3.17 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +51.7% | +0.5% | +94.7% | +54.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 52.2 | 28.8 | 54.5 | 49.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.5M | 9.4M | 2.5M | 1.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — ARE and ONCO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ARE as "Hold", CTRE as "Buy", CRVS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 127.3% upside for CRVS (target: $33) vs 7.6% for CTRE (target: $43). For income investors, ONCO offers the higher dividend yield at 30.89% vs CTRE's 3.22%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | — | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $51.11 | — | $42.50 | $33.17 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 24 | — | 19 | 13 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +11.7% | +30.9% | +3.2% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 15 | 0 | 2 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $5.35 | $0.12 | $1.27 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.6% | 0.0% | +0.0% | 0.0% |
CTRE leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CRVS leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
ARE vs ONCO vs CTRE vs CRVS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ARE or ONCO or CTRE or CRVS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, CareTrust REIT, Inc.
(CTRE) is the stronger pick with 108. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -67. 7% for Onconetix, Inc. (ONCO). CareTrust REIT, Inc. (CTRE) offers the better valuation at 25. 2x trailing P/E (28. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate CareTrust REIT, Inc. (CTRE) a "Buy" — based on 19 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ARE or ONCO or CTRE or CRVS?
On forward P/E, CareTrust REIT, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 28. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ARE or ONCO or CTRE or CRVS?
Over the past 5 years, Corvus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(CRVS) delivered a total return of +401. 4%, compared to -100. 0% for Onconetix, Inc. (ONCO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CTRE returned +280. 4% versus ONCO's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ARE or ONCO or CTRE or CRVS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), CareTrust REIT, Inc.
(CTRE) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 20β versus Corvus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 's 1. 57β — meaning CRVS is approximately 693% more volatile than CTRE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Onconetix, Inc. (ONCO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 67% for Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ARE or ONCO or CTRE or CRVS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), CareTrust REIT, Inc.
(CTRE) is pulling ahead at 108. 8% versus -67. 7% for Onconetix, Inc. (ONCO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Onconetix, Inc. grew EPS 99. 1% year-over-year, compared to -568. 9% for Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CTRE leads at 36. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ARE or ONCO or CTRE or CRVS?
CareTrust REIT, Inc.
(CTRE) is the more profitable company, earning 67. 3% net margin versus -1721. 0% for Onconetix, Inc. — meaning it keeps 67. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CTRE leads at 67. 2% versus -778. 2% for ONCO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ONCO leads at 77. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ARE or ONCO or CTRE or CRVS more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, CareTrust REIT, Inc.
(CTRE) trades at 28. 0x forward P/E versus 61. 0x for Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc. — 33. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CRVS: 127. 3% to $33. 17.
08Which pays a better dividend — ARE or ONCO or CTRE or CRVS?
In this comparison, ONCO (30.
9% yield), ARE (11. 7% yield), CTRE (3. 2% yield) pay a dividend. CRVS does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ARE or ONCO or CTRE or CRVS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, CareTrust REIT, Inc.
(CTRE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 20), 3. 2% yield, +280. 4% 10Y return). Corvus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (CRVS) carries a higher beta of 1. 57 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CTRE: +280. 4%, CRVS: +24. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ARE and ONCO and CTRE and CRVS?
These companies operate in different sectors (ARE (Real Estate) and ONCO (Healthcare) and CTRE (Real Estate) and CRVS (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: ARE is a small-cap income-oriented stock; ONCO is a small-cap income-oriented stock; CTRE is a small-cap high-growth stock; CRVS is a small-cap quality compounder stock. ARE, ONCO, CTRE pay a dividend while CRVS does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.