Restaurants
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
ARKR vs TXRH vs CAKE vs DRI vs BLMN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Restaurants
Restaurants
Restaurants
Restaurants
ARKR vs TXRH vs CAKE vs DRI vs BLMN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Restaurants | Restaurants | Restaurants | Restaurants | Restaurants |
| Market Cap | $27M | $10.41B | $3.03B | $23.11B | $678M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $162M | $6.06B | $3.75B | $12.76B | $3.97B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-14M | $415M | $148M | $1.11B | $22M |
| Gross Margin | 6.9% | 18.7% | 78.3% | 44.0% | 70.2% |
| Operating Margin | -0.5% | 8.2% | 5.0% | 11.6% | 1.1% |
| Forward P/E | — | 25.0x | 15.0x | 18.4x | 9.5x |
| Total Debt | $86M | $1.89B | $3.46B | $6.23B | $3.07B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $11M | $135M | $216M | $240M | $59M |
ARKR vs TXRH vs CAKE vs DRI vs BLMN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ark Restaurants Cor… (ARKR) | 100 | 60.4 | -39.6% |
| Texas Roadhouse, In… (TXRH) | 100 | 304.6 | +204.6% |
| The Cheesecake Fact… (CAKE) | 100 | 283.1 | +183.1% |
| Darden Restaurants,… (DRI) | 100 | 253.9 | +153.9% |
| Bloomin' Brands, In… (BLMN) | 100 | 69.7 | -30.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ARKR vs TXRH vs CAKE vs DRI vs BLMN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Among these 5 stocks, ARKR doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
TXRH carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 9.4%, EPS growth -5.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 13.5%
- 288.0% 10Y total return vs DRI's 261.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.70, current ratio 0.50x
- 9.4% revenue growth vs ARKR's -9.7%
CAKE ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +23.5% vs ARKR's -37.3%
DRI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 0.55, yield 2.8%
- Beta 0.55, yield 2.8%, current ratio 0.42x
- 8.7% margin vs ARKR's -8.5%
- Beta 0.55 vs BLMN's 1.82, lower leverage
BLMN is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (9.5x vs 18.4x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 9.4% revenue growth vs ARKR's -9.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.5x vs 18.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 8.7% margin vs ARKR's -8.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.55 vs BLMN's 1.82, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.7% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs BLMN's 5.6%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +23.5% vs ARKR's -37.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 12.2% ROA vs ARKR's -10.5%, ROIC 14.5% vs -2.6% |
ARKR vs TXRH vs CAKE vs DRI vs BLMN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
ARKR vs TXRH vs CAKE vs DRI vs BLMN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
DRI leads in 1 of 6 categories
TXRH leads 1 • CAKE leads 1 • ARKR leads 0 • BLMN leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DRI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DRI is the larger business by revenue, generating $12.8B annually — 79.0x ARKR's $162M. DRI is the more profitable business, keeping 8.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ARKR's -8.5%. On growth, TXRH holds the edge at +12.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $162M | $6.1B | $3.8B | $12.8B | $4.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $2M | $709M | $296M | $2.0B | $225M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$14M | $415M | $148M | $1.1B | $22M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$1M | $441M | $155M | $1.6B | $119M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +6.9% | +18.7% | +78.3% | +44.0% | +70.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -0.5% | +8.2% | +5.0% | +11.6% | +1.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -8.5% | +6.8% | +4.0% | +8.7% | +0.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -0.9% | +7.3% | +4.1% | +12.3% | +3.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -9.4% | +12.8% | +4.4% | +5.9% | +1.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -71.6% | +10.0% | -28.6% | -3.3% | +30.0% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — ARKR and BLMN each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 19.8x trailing earnings, CAKE trades at a 84% valuation discount to BLMN's 126.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, BLMN's 10.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CAKE's 21.2x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $27M | $10.4B | $3.0B | $23.1B | $678M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $101M | $12.2B | $6.3B | $29.1B | $3.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -2.33x | 25.89x | 19.80x | 22.03x | 125.99x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 25.05x | 15.04x | 18.37x | 9.53x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.38x | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 17.15x | 21.19x | 15.49x | 10.83x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.16x | 1.77x | 0.81x | 1.91x | 0.17x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.83x | 7.09x | 6.74x | 10.00x | 2.01x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 30.44x | 19.55x | 22.32x | 7.00x |
Profitability & Efficiency
TXRH leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
DRI delivers a 50.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $51 in annual profit, vs $-42 for ARKR. TXRH carries lower financial leverage with a 1.27x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BLMN's 9.10x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CAKE scores 6/9 vs TXRH's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -41.5% | +37.4% | +37.1% | +50.7% | +5.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -10.5% | +12.2% | +4.7% | +8.6% | +0.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -2.6% | +14.5% | +4.7% | +13.0% | +4.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -3.4% | +20.1% | +7.8% | +14.0% | +6.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 | 6 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.67x | 1.27x | 7.93x | 2.70x | 9.10x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $74M | $1.8B | $3.2B | $6.0B | $3.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $11M | $135M | $216M | $240M | $59M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $86M | $1.9B | $3.5B | $6.2B | $3.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -21.75x | — | 16.15x | 7.57x | 1.06x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CAKE leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TXRH five years ago would be worth $16,160 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,597 for BLMN. Over the past 12 months, CAKE leads with a +23.5% total return vs ARKR's -37.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CAKE at 24.3% vs BLMN's -24.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +12.0% | -7.4% | +15.7% | +5.8% | +24.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -37.3% | -6.2% | +23.5% | +1.6% | +13.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -52.4% | +53.6% | +92.1% | +41.1% | -56.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -55.9% | +61.6% | +2.1% | +55.4% | -64.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -36.1% | +288.0% | +35.6% | +261.8% | -36.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -21.9% | +15.4% | +24.3% | +12.2% | -24.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ARKR and CAKE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ARKR is the less volatile stock with a -0.42 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BLMN's 1.82 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CAKE currently trades 87.2% from its 52-week high vs ARKR's 58.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.42x | 0.70x | 1.11x | 0.55x | 1.82x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $12.60 | $199.99 | $69.70 | $228.27 | $10.70 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.98 | $153.82 | $43.07 | $169.00 | $5.19 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +58.7% | +79.0% | +87.2% | +85.5% | +74.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 53.4 | 45.7 | 50.5 | 47.2 | 73.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 5K | 983K | 1.2M | 1.3M | 2.8M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — TXRH and BLMN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: TXRH as "Hold", CAKE as "Hold", DRI as "Buy", BLMN as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 21.3% upside for TXRH (target: $192) vs 6.9% for BLMN (target: $9). For income investors, BLMN offers the higher dividend yield at 5.65% vs TXRH's 1.72%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Hold | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $191.64 | $65.50 | $225.36 | $8.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 43 | 48 | 59 | 28 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.7% | +1.8% | +2.8% | +5.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 5 | 0 | 4 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $2.71 | $1.08 | $5.56 | $0.45 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.4% | +5.1% | +1.8% | 0.0% |
DRI leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). TXRH leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.
ARKR vs TXRH vs CAKE vs DRI vs BLMN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ARKR or TXRH or CAKE or DRI or BLMN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Texas Roadhouse, Inc.
(TXRH) is the stronger pick with 9. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 7% for Ark Restaurants Corp. (ARKR). The Cheesecake Factory Incorporated (CAKE) offers the better valuation at 19. 8x trailing P/E (15. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Darden Restaurants, Inc. (DRI) a "Buy" — based on 59 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ARKR or TXRH or CAKE or DRI or BLMN?
On trailing P/E, The Cheesecake Factory Incorporated (CAKE) is the cheapest at 19.
8x versus Bloomin' Brands, Inc. at 126. 0x. On forward P/E, Bloomin' Brands, Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ARKR or TXRH or CAKE or DRI or BLMN?
Over the past 5 years, Texas Roadhouse, Inc.
(TXRH) delivered a total return of +61. 6%, compared to -64. 0% for Bloomin' Brands, Inc. (BLMN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TXRH returned +288. 0% versus BLMN's -36. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ARKR or TXRH or CAKE or DRI or BLMN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Ark Restaurants Corp.
(ARKR) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 42β versus Bloomin' Brands, Inc. 's 1. 82β — meaning BLMN is approximately -533% more volatile than ARKR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Texas Roadhouse, Inc. (TXRH) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 127% versus 9% for Bloomin' Brands, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ARKR or TXRH or CAKE or DRI or BLMN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Texas Roadhouse, Inc.
(TXRH) is pulling ahead at 9. 4% versus -9. 7% for Ark Restaurants Corp. (ARKR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Bloomin' Brands, Inc. grew EPS 104. 2% year-over-year, compared to -194. 4% for Ark Restaurants Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TXRH leads at 13. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ARKR or TXRH or CAKE or DRI or BLMN?
Darden Restaurants, Inc.
(DRI) is the more profitable company, earning 8. 7% net margin versus -6. 9% for Ark Restaurants Corp. — meaning it keeps 8. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: DRI leads at 11. 3% versus -2. 5% for ARKR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CAKE leads at 78. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ARKR or TXRH or CAKE or DRI or BLMN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Bloomin' Brands, Inc.
(BLMN) trades at 9. 5x forward P/E versus 25. 0x for Texas Roadhouse, Inc. — 15. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TXRH: 21. 3% to $191. 64.
08Which pays a better dividend — ARKR or TXRH or CAKE or DRI or BLMN?
In this comparison, BLMN (5.
6% yield), DRI (2. 8% yield), CAKE (1. 8% yield), TXRH (1. 7% yield) pay a dividend. ARKR does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ARKR or TXRH or CAKE or DRI or BLMN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Ark Restaurants Corp.
(ARKR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 42)). Bloomin' Brands, Inc. (BLMN) carries a higher beta of 1. 82 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ARKR: -36. 1%, BLMN: -36. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ARKR and TXRH and CAKE and DRI and BLMN?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: ARKR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TXRH is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; CAKE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; DRI is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; BLMN is a small-cap income-oriented stock. TXRH, CAKE, DRI, BLMN pay a dividend while ARKR does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.