Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
ARMP vs PHGE vs LSTA vs SIGA vs ACXP
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
Biotechnology
ARMP vs PHGE vs LSTA vs SIGA vs ACXP — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $331M | $1.01B | $29M | $339M | $5M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $5M | $0.00 | $170K | $94M | $0.00 |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-47M | $-36M | $-17M | $-4.04T | $-7.97B |
| Gross Margin | 70.5% | — | 91.2% | 61.8% | — |
| Operating Margin | -6.6% | — | -107.1% | 27.7% | — |
| Forward P/E | — | — | — | 2.8x | — |
| Total Debt | $127M | $1M | $0.00 | $595K | $0.00 |
| Cash & Equiv. | $9M | $5M | $16M | $155M | $7.56B |
ARMP vs PHGE vs LSTA vs SIGA vs ACXP — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Armata Pharmaceutic… (ARMP) | 100 | 209.1 | +109.1% |
| BiomX Inc. (PHGE) | 100 | 0.1 | -99.9% |
| Lisata Therapeutics… (LSTA) | 100 | 13.0 | -87.0% |
| SIGA Technologies, … (SIGA) | 100 | 76.4 | -23.6% |
| Acurx Pharmaceutica… (ACXP) | 100 | 1.6 | -98.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ARMP vs PHGE vs LSTA vs SIGA vs ACXP
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ARMP carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 14.2%, EPS growth 72.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.0%
- 14.2% revenue growth vs LSTA's -83.0%
- +5.7% vs PHGE's -94.3%
PHGE is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and stability is your priority.
- -0.7% margin vs SIGA's -43K%
- Beta 1.14 vs ACXP's 2.42
LSTA lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
SIGA ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 1.15, yield 12.7%
- 7.6% 10Y total return vs ARMP's -97.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.15, Low D/E 0.3%, current ratio 11.83x
- Beta 1.15, yield 12.7%, current ratio 11.83x
Among these 5 stocks, ACXP doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 14.2% revenue growth vs LSTA's -83.0% | |
| Quality / Margins | -0.7% margin vs SIGA's -43K% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.14 vs ACXP's 2.42 | |
| Dividends | 12.7% yield; 4-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +5.7% vs PHGE's -94.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -7.4% ROA vs ACXP's -413.5% |
ARMP vs PHGE vs LSTA vs SIGA vs ACXP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
ARMP vs PHGE vs LSTA vs SIGA vs ACXP — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SIGA leads in 3 of 6 categories
ARMP leads 1 • PHGE leads 0 • LSTA leads 0 • ACXP leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SIGA leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SIGA and ACXP operate at a comparable scale, with $94M and $0 in trailing revenue. ARMP is the more profitable business, keeping -9.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SIGA's -43117.4%. On growth, SIGA holds the edge at -11.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $5M | $0 | $170,000 | $94M | $0 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$32M | -$28M | -$18M | $26M | $35,910 |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$47M | -$36M | -$17M | -$4.04T | -$8.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$27M | -$26M | -$16M | $33M | $4.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +70.5% | — | +91.2% | +61.8% | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -6.6% | — | -107.1% | +27.7% | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -9.3% | — | -97.6% | -43117.4% | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -5.4% | — | -94.1% | +35.2% | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -61.0% | — | -90.0% | -11.3% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.9% | +17.1% | +40.0% | — | +98.2% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — ARMP and SIGA and ACXP each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $331M | $1.0B | $29M | $339M | $5M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $449M | $1.0B | $13M | $185M | -$7.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -17.49x | -0.03x | -1.69x | 14.33x | -0.40x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | 2.82x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | 7.60x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 64.06x | — | 173.02x | 3.58x | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | — | 1.92x | 1.70x | 0.00x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | 6.96x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
SIGA leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SIGA delivers a -10.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-11 in annual profit, vs $-6 for ACXP. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SIGA scores 5/9 vs LSTA's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | -2.7% | -85.5% | -10.7% | -6.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -54.5% | -80.4% | -70.8% | -7.4% | -4.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -44.2% | -4.4% | -2.3% | +33.7% | — |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -70.7% | -66.6% | -82.7% | +11.3% | — |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | — | — | 0.00x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $117M | -$4M | -$16M | -$154M | -$7.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $9M | $5M | $16M | $155M | $7.6B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $127M | $1M | $0 | $595,169 | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -2.12x | -33.64x | — | — | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ARMP leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ARMP five years ago would be worth $21,942 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5 for PHGE. Over the past 12 months, ARMP leads with a +567.9% total return vs PHGE's -94.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ARMP at 89.7% vs PHGE's -77.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +39.5% | -71.1% | +64.8% | -15.0% | -23.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +567.9% | -94.3% | +40.4% | +1.5% | -70.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +582.8% | -98.9% | -1.2% | +22.2% | -96.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +119.4% | -99.9% | -85.8% | +1.4% | -98.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.4% | -100.0% | -96.8% | +764.0% | -98.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +89.7% | -77.4% | -0.4% | +6.9% | -67.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — PHGE and LSTA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PHGE is the less volatile stock with a 1.14 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ACXP's 2.42 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LSTA currently trades 63.7% from its 52-week high vs PHGE's 4.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.24x | 1.05x | 1.09x | 1.09x | 2.31x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $16.34 | $14.71 | $5.07 | $9.62 | $21.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.17 | $0.61 | $1.81 | $4.29 | $1.33 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +56.0% | +4.2% | +63.7% | +49.2% | +10.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 42.2 | 21.4 | 35.1 | 47.0 | 40.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 50K | 193K | 76K | 688K | 3.6M |
Analyst Outlook
SIGA leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ARMP as "Buy", PHGE as "Buy", SIGA as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 6037.9% upside for PHGE (target: $38) vs 63.9% for ARMP (target: $15). SIGA is the only dividend payer here at 12.73% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | — | Buy | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $15.00 | $38.00 | — | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 4 | 5 | — | 1 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +12.7% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — | 1 | 4 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $0.60 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +100.0% |
SIGA leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ARMP leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
ARMP vs PHGE vs LSTA vs SIGA vs ACXP: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ARMP or PHGE or LSTA or SIGA or ACXP a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Armata Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(ARMP) is the stronger pick with 14. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -83. 0% for Lisata Therapeutics, Inc. (LSTA). SIGA Technologies, Inc. (SIGA) offers the better valuation at 14. 3x trailing P/E (2. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Armata Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (ARMP) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — ARMP or PHGE or LSTA or SIGA or ACXP?
Over the past 5 years, Armata Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(ARMP) delivered a total return of +119. 4%, compared to -99. 9% for BiomX Inc. (PHGE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SIGA returned +772. 1% versus PHGE's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — ARMP or PHGE or LSTA or SIGA or ACXP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), BiomX Inc.
(PHGE) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 05β versus Acurx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 's 2. 31β — meaning ACXP is approximately 120% more volatile than PHGE relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — ARMP or PHGE or LSTA or SIGA or ACXP?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Armata Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(ARMP) is pulling ahead at 14. 2% versus -83. 0% for Lisata Therapeutics, Inc. (LSTA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Armata Pharmaceuticals, Inc. grew EPS 72. 6% year-over-year, compared to -60. 2% for SIGA Technologies, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ARMP leads at 5. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — ARMP or PHGE or LSTA or SIGA or ACXP?
SIGA Technologies, Inc.
(SIGA) is the more profitable company, earning 24. 6% net margin versus -97. 6% for Lisata Therapeutics, Inc. — meaning it keeps 24. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SIGA leads at 25. 1% versus -107. 1% for LSTA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SIGA leads at 68. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is ARMP or PHGE or LSTA or SIGA or ACXP more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PHGE: 6037.
9% to $38. 00.
07Which pays a better dividend — ARMP or PHGE or LSTA or SIGA or ACXP?
In this comparison, SIGA (12.
7% yield) pays a dividend. ARMP, PHGE, LSTA, ACXP do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is ARMP or PHGE or LSTA or SIGA or ACXP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, SIGA Technologies, Inc.
(SIGA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 09), 12. 7% yield, +772. 1% 10Y return). Acurx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (ACXP) carries a higher beta of 2. 31 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SIGA: +772. 1%, ACXP: -98. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between ARMP and PHGE and LSTA and SIGA and ACXP?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: ARMP is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PHGE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LSTA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SIGA is a small-cap deep-value stock; ACXP is a small-cap quality compounder stock. SIGA pays a dividend while ARMP, PHGE, LSTA, ACXP do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.