Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
ARQT vs DERM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
ARQT vs DERM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic |
| Market Cap | $3.02B | $106M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $416M | $56M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-2M | $-9M |
| Gross Margin | 90.9% | 67.5% |
| Operating Margin | 0.8% | -12.2% |
| Forward P/E | 90.8x | 71.9x |
| Total Debt | $6M | $26M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $43M | $20M |
ARQT vs DERM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Nov 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arcutis Biotherapeu… (ARQT) | 100 | 145.9 | +45.9% |
| Journey Medical Cor… (DERM) | 100 | 65.9 | -34.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ARQT vs DERM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ARQT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 1.48
- Rev growth 91.3%, EPS growth 88.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 367.3%
- 10.9% 10Y total return vs DERM's -45.2%
DERM is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (71.9x vs 90.8x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 91.3% revenue growth vs DERM's -29.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (71.9x vs 90.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | -0.6% margin vs DERM's -15.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.48 vs DERM's 1.82, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +68.8% vs DERM's -19.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -0.6% ROA vs DERM's -10.8%, ROIC -5.2% vs -56.8% |
ARQT vs DERM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
ARQT vs DERM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ARQT leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ARQT is the larger business by revenue, generating $416M annually — 7.4x DERM's $56M. ARQT is the more profitable business, keeping -0.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to DERM's -15.5%. On growth, ARQT holds the edge at +60.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $416M | $56M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $6M | -$3M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$2M | -$9M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $27M | -$3M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +90.9% | +67.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +0.8% | -12.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -0.6% | -15.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +6.5% | -4.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +60.1% | +1.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +55.0% | +5.9% |
Valuation Metrics
DERM leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.0B | $106M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.0B | $112M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -185.92x | -7.24x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 90.83x | 71.86x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 8.04x | 1.90x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 16.23x | 5.30x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
ARQT leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ARQT delivers a -1.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-1 in annual profit, vs $-45 for DERM. ARQT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to DERM's 1.28x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ARQT scores 4/9 vs DERM's 2/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -1.4% | -45.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.6% | -10.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -5.2% | -56.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -4.3% | -34.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.03x | 1.28x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$37M | $5M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $43M | $20M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $6M | $26M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 4.00x | -1.52x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ARQT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ARQT five years ago would be worth $7,410 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,484 for DERM. Over the past 12 months, ARQT leads with a +68.8% total return vs DERM's -19.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors DERM at 46.7% vs ARQT's 19.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -16.7% | -30.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +68.8% | -19.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +69.5% | +215.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -25.9% | -45.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +10.9% | -45.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +19.2% | +46.7% |
Risk & Volatility
ARQT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ARQT is the less volatile stock with a 1.48 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than DERM's 1.82 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ARQT currently trades 76.1% from its 52-week high vs DERM's 54.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.48x | 1.82x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $31.77 | $9.55 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $12.42 | $4.31 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +76.1% | +54.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 48.6 | 43.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.2M | 228K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates ARQT as "Buy" and DERM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 125.5% upside for DERM (target: $12) vs 46.9% for ARQT (target: $36).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $35.50 | $11.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 12 | 3 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
ARQT leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). DERM leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
ARQT vs DERM: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ARQT or DERM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc.
(ARQT) is the stronger pick with 91. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -29. 1% for Journey Medical Corporation (DERM). Analysts rate Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc. (ARQT) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — ARQT or DERM?
Over the past 5 years, Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc.
(ARQT) delivered a total return of -25. 9%, compared to -45. 2% for Journey Medical Corporation (DERM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ARQT returned +10. 9% versus DERM's -45. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — ARQT or DERM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc.
(ARQT) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 48β versus Journey Medical Corporation's 1. 82β — meaning DERM is approximately 23% more volatile than ARQT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc. (ARQT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 128% for Journey Medical Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — ARQT or DERM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc.
(ARQT) is pulling ahead at 91. 3% versus -29. 1% for Journey Medical Corporation (DERM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc. grew EPS 88. 8% year-over-year, compared to -242. 9% for Journey Medical Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, ARQT leads at 367. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — ARQT or DERM?
Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc.
(ARQT) is the more profitable company, earning -4. 3% net margin versus -26. 1% for Journey Medical Corporation — meaning it keeps -4. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ARQT leads at -3. 3% versus -24. 4% for DERM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ARQT leads at 90. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is ARQT or DERM more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Journey Medical Corporation (DERM) trades at 71.
9x forward P/E versus 90. 8x for Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc. — 19. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DERM: 125. 5% to $11. 75.
07Which pays a better dividend — ARQT or DERM?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is ARQT or DERM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc.
(ARQT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. Journey Medical Corporation (DERM) carries a higher beta of 1. 82 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ARQT: +10. 9%, DERM: -45. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between ARQT and DERM?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: ARQT is a small-cap high-growth stock; DERM is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.