Solar
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
ARRY vs NEE vs FSLR vs CWEN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Regulated Electric
Solar
Renewable Utilities
ARRY vs NEE vs FSLR vs CWEN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Solar | Regulated Electric | Solar | Renewable Utilities |
| Market Cap | $1.25B | $194.60B | $23.06B | $7.84B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.21B | $27.93B | $5.42B | $1.43B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-67M | $8.18B | $1.67B | $169M |
| Gross Margin | 22.4% | 47.8% | 41.7% | 50.3% |
| Operating Margin | 4.5% | 29.5% | 33.0% | 12.0% |
| Forward P/E | 11.7x | 23.1x | 12.0x | 26.9x |
| Total Debt | $766M | $95.62B | $499M | $10.20B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $244M | $2.81B | $2.80B | $818M |
ARRY vs NEE vs FSLR vs CWEN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Array Technologies,… (ARRY) | 100 | 22.3 | -77.7% |
| NextEra Energy, Inc. (NEE) | 100 | 127.5 | +27.5% |
| First Solar, Inc. (FSLR) | 100 | 246.5 | +146.5% |
| Clearway Energy, In… (CWEN) | 100 | 135.4 | +35.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ARRY vs NEE vs FSLR vs CWEN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ARRY is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 40.2%, EPS growth 62.6%, 3Y rev CAGR -7.8%
- 40.2% revenue growth vs CWEN's 4.2%
- Lower P/E (11.7x vs 26.9x)
NEE is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.21, current ratio 0.60x
- Beta 0.21 vs ARRY's 2.32, lower leverage
FSLR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 324.1% 10Y total return vs NEE's 266.0%
- PEG 0.39 vs NEE's 1.33
- 30.7% margin vs ARRY's -5.6%
- +65.3% vs CWEN's +39.6%
CWEN is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.54, yield 7.9%
- Beta 0.54, yield 7.9%, current ratio 1.13x
- 7.9% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs NEE's 2.4%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 40.2% revenue growth vs CWEN's 4.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.7x vs 26.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 30.7% margin vs ARRY's -5.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.21 vs ARRY's 2.32, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 7.9% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs NEE's 2.4%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +65.3% vs CWEN's +39.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 12.6% ROA vs ARRY's -4.4%, ROIC 17.6% vs 9.0% |
ARRY vs NEE vs FSLR vs CWEN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
ARRY vs NEE vs FSLR vs CWEN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FSLR leads in 3 of 6 categories
ARRY leads 1 • NEE leads 1 • CWEN leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FSLR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NEE is the larger business by revenue, generating $27.9B annually — 23.2x ARRY's $1.2B. FSLR is the more profitable business, keeping 30.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ARRY's -5.6%. On growth, FSLR holds the edge at +23.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.2B | $27.9B | $5.4B | $1.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $95M | $15.5B | $2.2B | $1.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$67M | $8.2B | $1.7B | $169M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $58M | -$3.8B | $1.7B | $268M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +22.4% | +47.8% | +41.7% | +50.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +4.5% | +29.5% | +33.0% | +12.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -5.6% | +29.3% | +30.7% | +11.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +4.8% | -13.6% | +30.8% | +18.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -26.1% | +7.3% | +23.6% | +21.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -7.0% | +160.0% | +65.1% | -35.3% |
Valuation Metrics
ARRY leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.1x trailing earnings, FSLR trades at a 47% valuation discount to NEE's 28.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), FSLR offers better value at 0.49x vs NEE's 1.64x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.3B | $194.6B | $23.1B | $7.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.8B | $287.4B | $20.8B | $17.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -11.23x | 28.36x | 15.10x | 26.86x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 11.75x | 23.07x | 12.04x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.64x | 0.49x | 0.59x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 13.50x | 18.73x | 9.38x | 16.23x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.98x | 7.08x | 4.42x | 5.48x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.80x | 2.93x | 2.42x | 0.77x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 15.72x | — | 19.42x | 21.24x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FSLR leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FSLR delivers a 18.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $-21 for ARRY. FSLR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ARRY's 2.94x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FSLR scores 7/9 vs CWEN's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -20.6% | +12.7% | +18.0% | +3.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -4.4% | +3.9% | +12.6% | +1.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +9.0% | +4.1% | +17.6% | +0.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +8.2% | +4.7% | +15.9% | +1.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 | 7 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.94x | 1.44x | 0.05x | 1.72x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $522M | $92.8B | -$2.3B | $9.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $244M | $2.8B | $2.8B | $818M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $766M | $95.6B | $499M | $10.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -2.42x | 1.99x | 53.51x | 0.55x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FSLR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FSLR five years ago would be worth $28,755 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,233 for ARRY. Over the past 12 months, FSLR leads with a +65.3% total return vs CWEN's +39.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CWEN at 12.8% vs ARRY's -24.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -15.3% | +16.1% | -21.8% | +13.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +62.7% | +42.0% | +65.3% | +39.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -56.1% | +31.0% | +20.9% | +43.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -67.7% | +38.2% | +187.6% | +72.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -77.5% | +266.0% | +324.1% | +237.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -24.0% | +9.4% | +6.5% | +12.8% |
Risk & Volatility
NEE leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NEE is the less volatile stock with a 0.21 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ARRY's 2.32 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NEE currently trades 94.5% from its 52-week high vs ARRY's 67.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.32x | 0.21x | 1.39x | 0.54x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $12.23 | $98.75 | $285.99 | $41.54 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $4.92 | $63.88 | $125.80 | $27.67 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +67.0% | +94.5% | +75.0% | +91.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 56.4 | 54.3 | 64.3 | 45.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 6.0M | 8.7M | 2.1M | 828K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — NEE and CWEN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ARRY as "Buy", NEE as "Buy", FSLR as "Buy", CWEN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 23.1% upside for FSLR (target: $264) vs 5.2% for NEE (target: $98). For income investors, CWEN offers the higher dividend yield at 7.89% vs NEE's 2.40%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $9.17 | $98.13 | $264.13 | $43.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 28 | 36 | 73 | 16 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +2.4% | — | +7.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 30 | — | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $2.24 | — | $3.01 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.1% | 0.0% |
FSLR leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ARRY leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
ARRY vs NEE vs FSLR vs CWEN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ARRY or NEE or FSLR or CWEN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Array Technologies, Inc.
(ARRY) is the stronger pick with 40. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 4. 2% for Clearway Energy, Inc. (CWEN). First Solar, Inc. (FSLR) offers the better valuation at 15. 1x trailing P/E (12. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Array Technologies, Inc. (ARRY) a "Buy" — based on 28 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ARRY or NEE or FSLR or CWEN?
On trailing P/E, First Solar, Inc.
(FSLR) is the cheapest at 15. 1x versus NextEra Energy, Inc. at 28. 4x. On forward P/E, Array Technologies, Inc. is actually cheaper at 11. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: First Solar, Inc. wins at 0. 39x versus NextEra Energy, Inc. 's 1. 33x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ARRY or NEE or FSLR or CWEN?
Over the past 5 years, First Solar, Inc.
(FSLR) delivered a total return of +187. 6%, compared to -67. 7% for Array Technologies, Inc. (ARRY). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FSLR returned +324. 1% versus ARRY's -77. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ARRY or NEE or FSLR or CWEN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), NextEra Energy, Inc.
(NEE) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 21β versus Array Technologies, Inc. 's 2. 32β — meaning ARRY is approximately 1019% more volatile than NEE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, First Solar, Inc. (FSLR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 3% for Array Technologies, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ARRY or NEE or FSLR or CWEN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Array Technologies, Inc.
(ARRY) is pulling ahead at 40. 2% versus 4. 2% for Clearway Energy, Inc. (CWEN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Clearway Energy, Inc. grew EPS 89. 3% year-over-year, compared to -2. 4% for NextEra Energy, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, FSLR leads at 25. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ARRY or NEE or FSLR or CWEN?
First Solar, Inc.
(FSLR) is the more profitable company, earning 29. 3% net margin versus -4. 1% for Array Technologies, Inc. — meaning it keeps 29. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FSLR leads at 32. 3% versus 6. 6% for ARRY. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NEE leads at 62. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ARRY or NEE or FSLR or CWEN more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, First Solar, Inc. (FSLR) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 39x versus NextEra Energy, Inc. 's 1. 33x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Array Technologies, Inc. (ARRY) trades at 11. 7x forward P/E versus 23. 1x for NextEra Energy, Inc. — 11. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FSLR: 23. 1% to $264. 13.
08Which pays a better dividend — ARRY or NEE or FSLR or CWEN?
In this comparison, CWEN (7.
9% yield), NEE (2. 4% yield) pay a dividend. ARRY, FSLR do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ARRY or NEE or FSLR or CWEN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, NextEra Energy, Inc.
(NEE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 21), 2. 4% yield, +266. 0% 10Y return). Array Technologies, Inc. (ARRY) carries a higher beta of 2. 32 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (NEE: +266. 0%, ARRY: -77. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ARRY and NEE and FSLR and CWEN?
These companies operate in different sectors (ARRY (Energy) and NEE (Utilities) and FSLR (Energy) and CWEN (Utilities)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: ARRY is a small-cap high-growth stock; NEE is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; FSLR is a mid-cap high-growth stock; CWEN is a small-cap income-oriented stock. NEE, CWEN pay a dividend while ARRY, FSLR do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.