Agricultural - Machinery
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
ARTW vs LEGH vs TWIN vs AGCO vs CNH
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Residential Construction
Industrial - Machinery
Agricultural - Machinery
Agricultural - Machinery
ARTW vs LEGH vs TWIN vs AGCO vs CNH — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Agricultural - Machinery | Residential Construction | Industrial - Machinery | Agricultural - Machinery | Agricultural - Machinery |
| Market Cap | $13M | $514M | $266M | $8.53B | $13.45B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $24M | $163M | $348M | $10.37B | $18.09B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $3M | $42M | $22M | $771M | $386M |
| Gross Margin | 31.4% | 48.4% | 27.9% | 24.9% | 31.4% |
| Operating Margin | 5.7% | 30.2% | 3.3% | 6.9% | 14.6% |
| Forward P/E | 41.9x | 10.6x | 25.2x | 20.4x | 26.1x |
| Total Debt | $5M | $3M | $49M | $2.69B | $27.03B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2K | $8M | $16M | $862M | $3.23B |
ARTW vs LEGH vs TWIN vs AGCO vs CNH — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Art's-Way Manufactu… (ARTW) | 100 | 131.4 | +31.4% |
| Legacy Housing Corp… (LEGH) | 100 | 165.8 | +65.8% |
| Twin Disc, Incorpor… (TWIN) | 100 | 335.3 | +235.3% |
| AGCO Corporation (AGCO) | 100 | 213.2 | +113.2% |
| CNH Industrial N.V. (CNH) | 100 | 176.3 | +76.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ARTW vs LEGH vs TWIN vs AGCO vs CNH
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ARTW ranks third and is worth considering specifically for efficiency.
- 11.5% ROA vs CNH's 0.9%, ROIC 1.9% vs 6.6%
LEGH carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.80, Low D/E 0.5%, current ratio 3.51x
- Lower P/E (10.6x vs 25.2x)
- 26.0% margin vs CNH's 2.1%
- Beta 0.80 vs ARTW's 1.18, lower leverage
TWIN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 1.04, yield 0.9%
- Rev growth 15.5%, EPS growth -117.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 11.9%
- 15.5% revenue growth vs ARTW's -19.1%
- +156.5% vs LEGH's -13.4%
AGCO is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 178.0% 10Y total return vs TWIN's 87.2%
- PEG 1.77 vs LEGH's 5.97
CNH is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.
- Beta 1.15, yield 2.5%, current ratio 7.75x
- 2.5% yield, vs TWIN's 0.9%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 15.5% revenue growth vs ARTW's -19.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.6x vs 25.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 26.0% margin vs CNH's 2.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.80 vs ARTW's 1.18, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.5% yield, vs TWIN's 0.9%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +156.5% vs LEGH's -13.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.5% ROA vs CNH's 0.9%, ROIC 1.9% vs 6.6% |
ARTW vs LEGH vs TWIN vs AGCO vs CNH — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
ARTW vs LEGH vs TWIN vs AGCO vs CNH — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
LEGH leads in 2 of 6 categories
TWIN leads 1 • ARTW leads 0 • AGCO leads 0 • CNH leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LEGH leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CNH is the larger business by revenue, generating $18.1B annually — 751.4x ARTW's $24M. LEGH is the more profitable business, keeping 26.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CNH's 2.1%. On growth, AGCO holds the edge at +14.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $24M | $163M | $348M | $10.4B | $18.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $2M | $51M | $27M | $963M | $3.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $3M | $42M | $22M | $771M | $386M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $596,642 | $30M | -$70,000 | $546M | $1.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +31.4% | +48.4% | +27.9% | +24.9% | +31.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +5.7% | +30.2% | +3.3% | +6.9% | +14.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +10.4% | +26.0% | +6.3% | +7.4% | +2.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +2.5% | +18.3% | -0.0% | +5.3% | +10.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +9.5% | -3.7% | +0.3% | +14.3% | -0.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +12.2% | +22.7% | +4.4% | -94.4% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — LEGH and AGCO each lead in 2 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.1x trailing earnings, AGCO trades at a 71% valuation discount to ARTW's 41.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), AGCO offers better value at 1.05x vs LEGH's 5.97x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $13M | $514M | $266M | $8.5B | $13.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $18M | $508M | $299M | $10.3B | $37.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 41.94x | 12.40x | -131.50x | 12.08x | 26.44x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 10.63x | 25.22x | 20.37x | 26.12x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 5.97x | — | 1.05x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 39.31x | 10.10x | 12.05x | 10.08x | 10.90x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.54x | 3.12x | 0.78x | 0.85x | 0.74x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.07x | 0.98x | 1.55x | 1.92x | 1.73x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 6.94x | 18.25x | 30.10x | 11.52x | 6.74x |
Profitability & Efficiency
LEGH leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ARTW delivers a 18.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $5 for CNH. LEGH carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CNH's 3.45x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AGCO scores 8/9 vs LEGH's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +18.1% | +8.1% | +13.2% | +16.7% | +4.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +11.5% | +7.4% | +6.1% | +6.3% | +0.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +1.9% | +7.1% | +3.9% | +8.3% | +6.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.1% | +9.4% | +4.5% | +9.0% | +8.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.40x | 0.00x | 0.30x | 0.59x | 3.45x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $5M | -$6M | $33M | $1.8B | $23.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1,860 | $8M | $16M | $862M | $3.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5M | $3M | $49M | $2.7B | $27.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 7.55x | 1926.55x | 1.82x | 10.36x | 1.76x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TWIN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TWIN five years ago would be worth $14,753 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,270 for CNH. Over the past 12 months, TWIN leads with a +156.5% total return vs LEGH's -13.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TWIN at 15.8% vs CNH's -7.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +10.4% | +11.8% | +13.9% | +11.5% | +15.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +42.5% | -13.4% | +156.5% | +25.9% | -9.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -3.0% | -5.4% | +55.3% | +1.4% | -19.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -21.5% | +9.5% | +47.5% | -9.6% | -27.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -17.8% | +79.3% | +87.2% | +178.0% | +87.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -1.0% | -1.8% | +15.8% | +0.5% | -7.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — LEGH and TWIN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LEGH is the less volatile stock with a 0.80 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ARTW's 1.18 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TWIN currently trades 93.8% from its 52-week high vs ARTW's 54.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.18x | 0.80x | 1.04x | 1.10x | 1.15x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.71 | $29.45 | $19.63 | $143.78 | $14.27 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.69 | $18.34 | $6.80 | $93.30 | $9.00 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +54.1% | +73.2% | +93.8% | +81.9% | +76.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.3 | 53.9 | 58.3 | 52.5 | 52.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 40K | 105K | 49K | 696K | 15.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — TWIN and CNH each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: LEGH as "Buy", TWIN as "Hold", AGCO as "Buy", CNH as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 36.8% upside for LEGH (target: $30) vs 8.1% for AGCO (target: $127). For income investors, CNH offers the higher dividend yield at 2.46% vs TWIN's 0.90%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $29.50 | — | $127.29 | $13.25 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 6 | 4 | 29 | 14 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +0.9% | +1.0% | +2.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $0.16 | $1.16 | $0.27 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.3% | +1.5% | +0.5% | +2.9% | 0.0% |
LEGH leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). TWIN leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.
ARTW vs LEGH vs TWIN vs AGCO vs CNH: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ARTW or LEGH or TWIN or AGCO or CNH a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Twin Disc, Incorporated (TWIN) is the stronger pick with 15.
5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -19. 1% for Art's-Way Manufacturing Co. , Inc. (ARTW). AGCO Corporation (AGCO) offers the better valuation at 12. 1x trailing P/E (20. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Legacy Housing Corporation (LEGH) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ARTW or LEGH or TWIN or AGCO or CNH?
On trailing P/E, AGCO Corporation (AGCO) is the cheapest at 12.
1x versus Art's-Way Manufacturing Co. , Inc. at 41. 9x. On forward P/E, Legacy Housing Corporation is actually cheaper at 10. 6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ARTW or LEGH or TWIN or AGCO or CNH?
Over the past 5 years, Twin Disc, Incorporated (TWIN) delivered a total return of +47.
5%, compared to -27. 3% for CNH Industrial N. V. (CNH). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AGCO returned +178. 0% versus ARTW's -17. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ARTW or LEGH or TWIN or AGCO or CNH?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Legacy Housing Corporation (LEGH) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
80β versus Art's-Way Manufacturing Co. , Inc. 's 1. 18β — meaning ARTW is approximately 48% more volatile than LEGH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Legacy Housing Corporation (LEGH) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 3% for CNH Industrial N. V. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ARTW or LEGH or TWIN or AGCO or CNH?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Twin Disc, Incorporated (TWIN) is pulling ahead at 15.
5% versus -19. 1% for Art's-Way Manufacturing Co. , Inc. (ARTW). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: AGCO Corporation grew EPS 271. 4% year-over-year, compared to -117. 7% for Twin Disc, Incorporated. Over a 3-year CAGR, TWIN leads at 11. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ARTW or LEGH or TWIN or AGCO or CNH?
Legacy Housing Corporation (LEGH) is the more profitable company, earning 25.
4% net margin versus -0. 6% for Twin Disc, Incorporated — meaning it keeps 25. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LEGH leads at 29. 4% versus 1. 9% for ARTW. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LEGH leads at 48. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ARTW or LEGH or TWIN or AGCO or CNH more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Legacy Housing Corporation (LEGH) trades at 10.
6x forward P/E versus 26. 1x for CNH Industrial N. V. — 15. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for LEGH: 36. 8% to $29. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — ARTW or LEGH or TWIN or AGCO or CNH?
In this comparison, CNH (2.
5% yield), AGCO (1. 0% yield), TWIN (0. 9% yield) pay a dividend. ARTW, LEGH do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ARTW or LEGH or TWIN or AGCO or CNH better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, AGCO Corporation (AGCO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.
10), 1. 0% yield, +178. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (AGCO: +178. 0%, ARTW: -17. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ARTW and LEGH and TWIN and AGCO and CNH?
These companies operate in different sectors (ARTW (Industrials) and LEGH (Consumer Cyclical) and TWIN (Industrials) and AGCO (Industrials) and CNH (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: ARTW is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LEGH is a small-cap deep-value stock; TWIN is a small-cap high-growth stock; AGCO is a small-cap deep-value stock; CNH is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. TWIN, AGCO, CNH pay a dividend while ARTW, LEGH do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.