Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

ASC vs TK vs FRO vs STNG vs DHT

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
ASC
Ardmore Shipping Corporation

Marine Shipping

IndustrialsNYSE • BM
Market Cap$770M
5Y Perf.+222.9%
TK
Teekay Corporation

Oil & Gas Midstream

EnergyNYSE • BM
Market Cap$1.18B
5Y Perf.+380.9%
FRO
Frontline Ltd.

Oil & Gas Midstream

EnergyNYSE • BM
Market Cap$8.48B
5Y Perf.+317.3%
STNG
Scorpio Tankers Inc.

Oil & Gas Midstream

EnergyNYSE • MC
Market Cap$4.38B
5Y Perf.+377.4%
DHT
DHT Holdings, Inc.

Oil & Gas Midstream

EnergyNYSE • BM
Market Cap$3.06B
5Y Perf.+220.0%

ASC vs TK vs FRO vs STNG vs DHT — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
ASC logoASC
TK logoTK
FRO logoFRO
STNG logoSTNG
DHT logoDHT
IndustryMarine ShippingOil & Gas MidstreamOil & Gas MidstreamOil & Gas MidstreamOil & Gas Midstream
Market Cap$770M$1.18B$8.48B$4.38B$3.06B
Revenue (TTM)$310M$993M$1.77B$1.04B$566M
Net Income (TTM)$41M$79M$218M$502M$331M
Gross Margin28.8%28.1%26.5%51.8%47.5%
Operating Margin20.8%24.8%25.5%38.8%50.1%
Forward P/E6.5x64.0x6.0x8.6x7.0x
Total Debt$129M$66M$3.75B$619M$429M
Cash & Equiv.$47M$685M$414M$752M$79M

ASC vs TK vs FRO vs STNG vs DHTLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

ASC
TK
FRO
STNG
DHT
StockMay 20May 26Return
Ardmore Shipping Co… (ASC)100322.9+222.9%
Teekay Corporation (TK)100480.9+380.9%
Frontline Ltd. (FRO)100417.3+317.3%
Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG)100477.4+377.4%
DHT Holdings, Inc. (DHT)100320.0+220.0%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: ASC vs TK vs FRO vs STNG vs DHT

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: FRO and DHT are tied at the top with 3 categories each (5-stock set) — the right choice depends on your priorities. DHT Holdings, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. TK also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
ASC
Ardmore Shipping Corporation
The Lower-Volatility Pick

ASC lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: industrials exposure
TK
Teekay Corporation
The Income Pick

TK ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and defensive.

  • Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.38, yield 6.5%
  • Beta 0.38, yield 6.5%, current ratio 6.99x
  • 6.5% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs FRO's 5.1%
Best for: income & stability and defensive
FRO
Frontline Ltd.
The Growth Play

FRO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 13.8%, EPS growth -24.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 39.9%
  • 5.1% 10Y total return vs ASC's 155.3%
  • PEG 0.26 vs STNG's 0.26
  • 13.8% revenue growth vs STNG's -24.6%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
STNG
Scorpio Tankers Inc.
The Defensive Pick

STNG is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.28, Low D/E 19.4%, current ratio 9.33x
Best for: sleep-well-at-night
DHT
DHT Holdings, Inc.
The Quality Compounder

DHT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and stability is your priority.

  • 58.6% margin vs TK's 7.9%
  • Beta 0.27 vs ASC's 0.48
  • 21.3% ROA vs TK's 3.5%, ROIC 8.9% vs 19.1%
Best for: quality and stability
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthFRO logoFRO13.8% revenue growth vs STNG's -24.6%
ValueFRO logoFROLower P/E (6.0x vs 7.0x)
Quality / MarginsDHT logoDHT58.6% margin vs TK's 7.9%
Stability / SafetyDHT logoDHTBeta 0.27 vs ASC's 0.48
DividendsTK logoTK6.5% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs FRO's 5.1%
Momentum (1Y)FRO logoFRO+132.3% vs DHT's +79.6%
Efficiency (ROA)DHT logoDHT21.3% ROA vs TK's 3.5%, ROIC 8.9% vs 19.1%

ASC vs TK vs FRO vs STNG vs DHT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

ASCArdmore Shipping Corporation

Segment breakdown not available.

TKTeekay Corporation
FY 2024
Voyage charters
87.4%$1.1B
Management fees and other
10.4%$127M
Time charters
2.1%$26M
FROFrontline Ltd.
FY 2024
Voyage Charter
95.3%$2.0B
Time Charter
4.1%$85M
Administrative Income
0.5%$10M
STNGScorpio Tankers Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

DHTDHT Holdings, Inc.
FY 2025
Voyage Charter Revenues
70.7%$351M
Time Charter Revenues
29.3%$146M

ASC vs TK vs FRO vs STNG vs DHT — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLTKLAGGINGSTNG

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

DHT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

FRO is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.8B annually — 5.7x ASC's $310M. DHT is the more profitable business, keeping 58.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TK's 7.9%. On growth, DHT holds the edge at +57.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricASC logoASCArdmore Shipping …TK logoTKTeekay CorporationFRO logoFROFrontline Ltd.STNG logoSTNGScorpio Tankers I…DHT logoDHTDHT Holdings, Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$310M$993M$1.8B$1.0B$566M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$101M$334M$781M$580M$388M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$41M$79M$218M$502M$331M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$41M$241M$557M$389M-$131M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+28.8%+28.1%+26.5%+51.8%+47.5%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+20.8%+24.8%+25.5%+38.8%+50.1%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+13.2%+7.9%+12.3%+48.4%+58.6%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-13.2%+24.2%+31.5%+37.5%-23.1%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+1.1%-29.0%-11.8%+46.2%+57.3%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+91.7%-2.4%-33.3%+2.5%+2.8%
DHT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

TK leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 9.9x trailing earnings, TK trades at a 54% valuation discount to ASC's 21.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), STNG offers better value at 0.36x vs FRO's 0.73x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricASC logoASCArdmore Shipping …TK logoTKTeekay CorporationFRO logoFROFrontline Ltd.STNG logoSTNGScorpio Tankers I…DHT logoDHTDHT Holdings, Inc.
Market CapShares × price$770M$1.2B$8.5B$4.4B$3.1B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$852M$565M$11.8B$4.3B$3.4B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS21.43x9.92x17.09x12.05x14.51x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.6.51x64.05x5.99x8.58x7.01x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.73x0.36x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple7.41x1.23x10.54x8.68x12.35x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue2.48x0.97x4.14x4.67x6.16x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.21x0.68x3.62x1.30x2.70x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF3.02x8.92x
TK leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

TK leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

DHT delivers a 29.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $29 in annual profit, vs $4 for TK. TK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FRO's 1.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DHT scores 7/9 vs FRO's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricASC logoASCArdmore Shipping …TK logoTKTeekay CorporationFRO logoFROFrontline Ltd.STNG logoSTNGScorpio Tankers I…DHT logoDHTDHT Holdings, Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+6.4%+4.0%+9.4%+15.9%+29.1%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+5.5%+3.5%+3.8%+12.6%+21.3%
ROICReturn on invested capital+9.0%+19.1%+10.6%+7.2%+8.9%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+11.3%+18.1%+14.1%+8.4%+11.7%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–956567
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.20x0.03x1.60x0.19x0.38x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$82M-$620M$3.3B-$133M$350M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$47M$685M$414M$752M$79M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$129M$66M$3.7B$619M$429M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense7.70x69.29x1.87x6.82x25.61x
TK leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

FRO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in FRO five years ago would be worth $56,570 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $38,217 for DHT. Over the past 12 months, FRO leads with a +132.3% total return vs DHT's +79.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TK at 51.1% vs ASC's 15.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricASC logoASCArdmore Shipping …TK logoTKTeekay CorporationFRO logoFROFrontline Ltd.STNG logoSTNGScorpio Tankers I…DHT logoDHTDHT Holdings, Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+81.3%+59.8%+90.1%+71.3%+65.4%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+97.0%+91.5%+132.3%+115.3%+79.6%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+55.2%+244.7%+203.4%+92.7%+167.8%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+388.2%+412.3%+465.7%+359.0%+282.2%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+155.3%+97.1%+513.5%+62.8%+318.3%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+15.8%+51.1%+44.8%+24.4%+38.9%
FRO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — TK and DHT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

DHT is the less volatile stock with a 0.27 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ASC's 0.48 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TK currently trades 99.1% from its 52-week high vs DHT's 92.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricASC logoASCArdmore Shipping …TK logoTKTeekay CorporationFRO logoFROFrontline Ltd.STNG logoSTNGScorpio Tankers I…DHT logoDHTDHT Holdings, Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.48x0.38x0.36x0.28x0.27x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$19.61$14.22$39.89$87.39$20.55
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$9.18$7.12$16.25$37.96$10.61
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+96.2%+99.1%+95.5%+96.9%+92.5%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10074.860.261.460.558.8
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded677K513K4.0M1.2M4.7M
Evenly matched — TK and DHT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

TK leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: ASC as "Buy", TK as "Buy", FRO as "Hold", STNG as "Buy", DHT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 1.0% upside for FRO (target: $39) vs -5.3% for DHT (target: $18). For income investors, TK offers the higher dividend yield at 6.47% vs STNG's 1.99%.

MetricASC logoASCArdmore Shipping …TK logoTKTeekay CorporationFRO logoFROFrontline Ltd.STNG logoSTNGScorpio Tankers I…DHT logoDHTDHT Holdings, Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyHoldBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$19.00$38.50$85.33$18.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts1714223116
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+2.0%+6.5%+5.1%+2.0%+3.9%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises03030
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.38$0.91$1.95$1.69$0.74
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+9.8%0.0%+0.0%0.0%
TK leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

TK leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). DHT leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 1 tied.

Best OverallTeekay Corporation (TK)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

ASC vs TK vs FRO vs STNG vs DHT: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is ASC or TK or FRO or STNG or DHT a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Frontline Ltd.

(FRO) is the stronger pick with 13. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -24. 6% for Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG). Teekay Corporation (TK) offers the better valuation at 9. 9x trailing P/E (64. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Ardmore Shipping Corporation (ASC) a "Buy" — based on 17 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — ASC or TK or FRO or STNG or DHT?

On trailing P/E, Teekay Corporation (TK) is the cheapest at 9.

9x versus Ardmore Shipping Corporation at 21. 4x. On forward P/E, Frontline Ltd. is actually cheaper at 6. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Frontline Ltd. wins at 0. 26x versus Scorpio Tankers Inc. 's 0. 26x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — ASC or TK or FRO or STNG or DHT?

Over the past 5 years, Frontline Ltd.

(FRO) delivered a total return of +465. 7%, compared to +282. 2% for DHT Holdings, Inc. (DHT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FRO returned +513. 5% versus STNG's +62. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — ASC or TK or FRO or STNG or DHT?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), DHT Holdings, Inc.

(DHT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 27β versus Ardmore Shipping Corporation's 0. 48β — meaning ASC is approximately 76% more volatile than DHT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Teekay Corporation (TK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 160% for Frontline Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — ASC or TK or FRO or STNG or DHT?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Frontline Ltd.

(FRO) is pulling ahead at 13. 8% versus -24. 6% for Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: DHT Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 17. 0% year-over-year, compared to -71. 2% for Ardmore Shipping Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, FRO leads at 39. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — ASC or TK or FRO or STNG or DHT?

DHT Holdings, Inc.

(DHT) is the more profitable company, earning 42. 5% net margin versus 11. 0% for Teekay Corporation — meaning it keeps 42. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FRO leads at 38. 1% versus 26. 1% for ASC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — STNG leads at 46. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is ASC or TK or FRO or STNG or DHT more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Frontline Ltd. (FRO) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 26x versus Scorpio Tankers Inc. 's 0. 26x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Frontline Ltd. (FRO) trades at 6. 0x forward P/E versus 64. 0x for Teekay Corporation — 58. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FRO: 1. 0% to $38. 50.

08

Which pays a better dividend — ASC or TK or FRO or STNG or DHT?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Teekay Corporation (TK) offers the highest yield at 6. 5%, versus 2. 0% for Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG).

09

Is ASC or TK or FRO or STNG or DHT better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Frontline Ltd.

(FRO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 36), 5. 1% yield, +513. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (FRO: +513. 5%, ASC: +155. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between ASC and TK and FRO and STNG and DHT?

These companies operate in different sectors (ASC (Industrials) and TK (Energy) and FRO (Energy) and STNG (Energy) and DHT (Energy)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: ASC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TK is a small-cap deep-value stock; FRO is a small-cap deep-value stock; STNG is a small-cap deep-value stock; DHT is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

ASC

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 7%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.7%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

TK

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
  • Dividend Yield > 2.5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

FRO

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 7%
  • Dividend Yield > 2.0%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

STNG

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 23%
  • Net Margin > 29%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

DHT

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 28%
  • Net Margin > 35%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform ASC and TK and FRO and STNG and DHT on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(ASC: 1.1% · TK: -29.0%)
Net Margin>
%
(ASC: 13.2% · TK: 7.9%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(ASC: 21.4x · TK: 9.9x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.