ASIC
Ategrity Specialty Holdings LLC
Insurance - Property & Casualty
Market Cap$943M
5Y Perf.-8.8%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
ASIC vs MMC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
MMC
Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc.
Insurance - Brokers
Market Cap$85.27B
5Y Perf.-13.9%
ASIC vs MMC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ASIC | MMC |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Insurance - Property & Casualty | Insurance - Brokers |
| Market Cap | $943M | $85.27B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $424M | $26.45B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $74M | $4.13B |
| Gross Margin | 50.0% | 42.3% |
| Operating Margin | 22.6% | 23.2% |
| Forward P/E | 10.1x | 16.9x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $21.86B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $30M | $2.40B |
ASIC vs MMC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
ASIC
MMC
| Stock | Jun 25 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ategrity Specialty … (ASIC) | 100 | 91.2 | -8.8% |
| Marsh & McLennan Co… (MMC) | 100 | 86.1 | -13.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ASIC vs MMC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: MMC leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. Ategrity Specialty Holdings LLC is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
ASIC
Ategrity Specialty Holdings LLC
The Insurance Pick
ASIC is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 23.4%, EPS growth 66.7%
- 23.4% revenue growth vs MMC's 7.6%
- Lower P/E (10.1x vs 16.9x)
Best for: growth exposure
MMC
Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc.
The Insurance Pick
MMC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 19 yrs, beta 0.14, yield 1.8%
- 210.8% 10Y total return vs ASIC's -20.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.14, current ratio 1.13x
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | ASIC | 23.4% revenue growth vs MMC's 7.6% |
| Value | ASIC | Lower P/E (10.1x vs 16.9x) |
| Quality / Margins | MMC | Combined ratio 0.8 vs ASIC's 0.8 (lower = better underwriting) |
| Stability / Safety | MMC | Beta 0.14 vs ASIC's 0.31 |
| Dividends | MMC | 1.8% yield, 19-year raise streak, vs ASIC's 0.8% |
| Momentum (1Y) | ASIC | -20.5% vs MMC's -21.6% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | MMC | 7.0% ROA vs ASIC's 5.4%, ROIC 15.2% vs 15.0% |
ASIC vs MMC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
FY 2024
ASIC vs MMC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLASICLAGGINGMMC
MMCMarsh & McLennan Comp…
2leads
ASICAtegrity Specialty Ho…
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs MMCMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
ASIC3/4
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
ASIC6/6
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
ASIC4/7
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
MMC4/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
MMC2/2
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ASIC leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MMC is the larger business by revenue, generating $26.5B annually — 62.3x ASIC's $424M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 17.4% (ASIC) to 15.6% (MMC).
| Metric | ASICAtegrity Specialt… | MMCMarsh & McLennan … |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $424M | $26.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $97M | $7.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $74M | $4.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $100M | $5.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +50.0% | +42.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +22.6% | +23.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +17.4% | +15.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +23.5% | +19.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +11.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | 0.0% |
ASIC leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
ASIC leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.3x trailing earnings, ASIC trades at a 42% valuation discount to MMC's 21.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ASIC's 9.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MMC's 16.0x.
| Metric | ASICAtegrity Specialt… | MMCMarsh & McLennan … |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $943M | $85.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $913M | $104.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 12.26x | 21.28x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.10x | 16.89x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.11x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.39x | 15.96x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.22x | 3.49x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.48x | 6.38x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 6.70x | 21.39x |
ASIC leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ASIC leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MMC delivers a 26.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $27 in annual profit, vs $14 for ASIC.
| Metric | ASICAtegrity Specialt… | MMCMarsh & McLennan … |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +13.5% | +26.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.4% | +7.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +15.0% | +15.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +18.7% | +17.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 1.62x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$30M | $19.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $30M | $2.4B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $21.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 71.63x | 6.66x |
ASIC leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MMC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MMC five years ago would be worth $13,665 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,950 for ASIC. Over the past 12 months, ASIC leads with a -20.5% total return vs MMC's -21.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MMC at 0.7% vs ASIC's -7.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ASICAtegrity Specialt… | MMCMarsh & McLennan … |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -2.7% | -3.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -20.5% | -21.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -20.5% | +2.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -20.5% | +36.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -20.5% | +210.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -7.4% | +0.7% |
MMC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ASIC and MMC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MMC is the less volatile stock with a 0.14 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ASIC's 0.31 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ASIC currently trades 77.5% from its 52-week high vs MMC's 73.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ASICAtegrity Specialt… | MMCMarsh & McLennan … |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.31x | 0.14x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $25.30 | $235.78 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $16.35 | $170.37 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +77.5% | +73.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 41.6 | 37.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 92K | 2.7M |
Evenly matched — ASIC and MMC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
MMC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates ASIC as "Buy" and MMC as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 30.0% upside for ASIC (target: $26) vs 18.8% for MMC (target: $207). For income investors, MMC offers the higher dividend yield at 1.75% vs ASIC's 0.76%.
| Metric | ASICAtegrity Specialt… | MMCMarsh & McLennan … |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $25.50 | $206.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 4 | 26 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.8% | +1.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 19 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.15 | $3.05 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.3% | +1.1% |
MMC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
ASIC leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). MMC leads in 2 (Total Returns, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
Best OverallAtegrity Specialty Holdings… (ASIC)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
ASIC vs MMC: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ASIC or MMC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Ategrity Specialty Holdings LLC (ASIC) is the stronger pick with 23.
4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 7. 6% for Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. (MMC). Ategrity Specialty Holdings LLC (ASIC) offers the better valuation at 12. 3x trailing P/E (10. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Ategrity Specialty Holdings LLC (ASIC) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ASIC or MMC?
On trailing P/E, Ategrity Specialty Holdings LLC (ASIC) is the cheapest at 12.
3x versus Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. at 21. 3x. On forward P/E, Ategrity Specialty Holdings LLC is actually cheaper at 10. 1x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ASIC or MMC?
Over the past 5 years, Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc.
(MMC) delivered a total return of +36. 6%, compared to -20. 5% for Ategrity Specialty Holdings LLC (ASIC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MMC returned +210. 8% versus ASIC's -20. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ASIC or MMC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc.
(MMC) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 14β versus Ategrity Specialty Holdings LLC's 0. 31β — meaning ASIC is approximately 126% more volatile than MMC relative to the S&P 500.
05Which is growing faster — ASIC or MMC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Ategrity Specialty Holdings LLC (ASIC) is pulling ahead at 23.
4% versus 7. 6% for Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. (MMC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Ategrity Specialty Holdings LLC grew EPS 66. 7% year-over-year, compared to 8. 6% for Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ASIC or MMC?
Ategrity Specialty Holdings LLC (ASIC) is the more profitable company, earning 17.
4% net margin versus 16. 6% for Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. — meaning it keeps 17. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MMC leads at 23. 8% versus 22. 6% for ASIC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ASIC leads at 50. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ASIC or MMC more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Ategrity Specialty Holdings LLC (ASIC) trades at 10.
1x forward P/E versus 16. 9x for Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. — 6. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ASIC: 30. 0% to $25. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — ASIC or MMC?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. (MMC) offers the highest yield at 1. 8%, versus 0. 8% for Ategrity Specialty Holdings LLC (ASIC).
09Is ASIC or MMC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc.
(MMC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 14), 1. 8% yield, +210. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MMC: +210. 8%, ASIC: -20. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ASIC and MMC?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: ASIC is a small-cap high-growth stock; MMC is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(ASIC: 23.4% · MMC: 11.5%)Net Margin>
%
(ASIC: 17.4% · MMC: 15.6%)P/E Ratio<
x
(ASIC: 12.3x · MMC: 21.3x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.