Chemicals
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
ASPI vs UUUU vs UEC vs DNN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Uranium
Uranium
Uranium
ASPI vs UUUU vs UEC vs DNN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Chemicals | Uranium | Uranium | Uranium |
| Market Cap | $498M | $5.80B | $7.63B | $3.36B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $8M | $85M | $20M | $5M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-106M | $-70M | $-82M | $-217M |
| Gross Margin | 23.0% | 37.3% | 28.3% | -486.6% |
| Operating Margin | -5.1% | -108.3% | -5.5% | -17.5% |
| Total Debt | $38M | $676M | $2M | $614M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $62M | $65M | $149M | $466M |
ASPI vs UUUU vs UEC vs DNN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Nov 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| ASP Isotopes Inc. C… (ASPI) | 100 | 249.2 | +149.2% |
| Energy Fuels Inc. (UUUU) | 100 | 336.6 | +236.6% |
| Uranium Energy Corp. (UEC) | 100 | 401.8 | +301.8% |
| Denison Mines Corp. (DNN) | 100 | 306.6 | +206.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ASPI vs UUUU vs UEC vs DNN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ASPI is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends.
- 100.0% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
UUUU carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for quality and momentum.
- -82.7% margin vs DNN's -44.2%
- +391.8% vs ASPI's -3.1%
UEC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 297.4%, EPS growth -172.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 42.4%
- 19.8% 10Y total return vs UUUU's 10.0%
- 297.4% revenue growth vs UUUU's -15.6%
- -6.4% ROA vs ASPI's -77.2%, ROIC -7.2% vs -98.6%
DNN is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 1.38
- Lower volatility, beta 1.38, current ratio 10.75x
- Beta 1.38, current ratio 10.75x
- Beta 1.38 vs ASPI's 2.70
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 297.4% revenue growth vs UUUU's -15.6% | |
| Quality / Margins | -82.7% margin vs DNN's -44.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.38 vs ASPI's 2.70 | |
| Dividends | 100.0% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +391.8% vs ASPI's -3.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -6.4% ROA vs ASPI's -77.2%, ROIC -7.2% vs -98.6% |
ASPI vs UUUU vs UEC vs DNN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
ASPI vs UUUU vs UEC vs DNN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
UUUU leads in 1 of 6 categories
UEC leads 1 • DNN leads 1 • ASPI leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
UUUU leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
UUUU is the larger business by revenue, generating $85M annually — 17.3x DNN's $5M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from -82.7% (UUUU) to -44.2% (DNN). On growth, ASPI holds the edge at +3.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $8M | $85M | $20M | $5M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$42M | -$94M | -$104M | -$68M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$106M | -$70M | -$82M | -$217M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$34M | -$87M | -$122M | -$119M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +23.0% | +37.3% | +28.3% | -4.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -5.1% | -108.3% | -5.5% | -17.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -12.6% | -82.7% | -4.0% | -44.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -4.1% | -102.5% | -6.0% | -24.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.5% | +112.1% | -59.4% | +4.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -25.0% | +64.2% | -19.0% | -71.6% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — ASPI and UUUU and UEC each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $498M | $5.8B | $7.6B | $3.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $474M | $6.4B | $7.5B | $3.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -8.46x | -63.14x | -77.95x | -20.41x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 120.09x | 87.96x | 114.12x | 931.81x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 5.80x | 7.96x | 6.78x | 12.43x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
UEC leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
UEC delivers a -7.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-7 in annual profit, vs $-190 for ASPI. UEC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to DNN's 1.67x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ASPI scores 5/9 vs UUUU's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -190.4% | -10.2% | -7.1% | -47.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -77.2% | -6.5% | -6.4% | -24.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -98.6% | -8.5% | -7.2% | -13.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -47.1% | -10.5% | -7.6% | -10.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 2 | 5 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.74x | 0.99x | 0.00x | 1.67x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$24M | $611M | -$149M | $148M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $62M | $65M | $149M | $466M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $38M | $676M | $2M | $614M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -268.41x | — | -185.47x | -11.43x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — ASPI and UUUU and UEC each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in UEC five years ago would be worth $46,677 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $19,963 for ASPI. Over the past 12 months, UUUU leads with a +391.8% total return vs ASPI's -3.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ASPI at 110.7% vs DNN's 50.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -5.3% | +40.0% | +18.9% | +23.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -3.1% | +391.8% | +170.2% | +147.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +835.1% | +286.1% | +490.5% | +243.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +99.6% | +272.6% | +366.8% | +214.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +99.6% | +996.7% | +1978.4% | +614.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +110.7% | +56.9% | +80.8% | +50.8% |
Risk & Volatility
DNN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
DNN is the less volatile stock with a 1.38 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ASPI's 2.70 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. DNN currently trades 84.4% from its 52-week high vs ASPI's 36.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.70x | 1.85x | 1.79x | 1.38x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $14.49 | $27.90 | $20.34 | $4.43 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.92 | $4.20 | $5.03 | $1.39 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +36.8% | +83.7% | +76.6% | +84.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 56.2 | 62.1 | 58.1 | 53.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 4.4M | 10.1M | 9.2M | 33.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ASPI as "Buy", UUUU as "Buy", UEC as "Buy", DNN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 143.9% upside for ASPI (target: $13) vs 3.1% for UUUU (target: $24). ASPI is the only dividend payer here at 100.00% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $13.00 | $24.08 | $18.67 | $4.25 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 8 | 8 | 8 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +100.0% | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $49929.39 | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.9% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
UUUU leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). UEC leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
ASPI vs UUUU vs UEC vs DNN: Key Questions Answered
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ASPI or UUUU or UEC or DNN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Uranium Energy Corp.
(UEC) is the stronger pick with 297. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -15. 6% for Energy Fuels Inc. (UUUU). Analysts rate ASP Isotopes Inc. Common Stock (ASPI) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — ASPI or UUUU or UEC or DNN?
Over the past 5 years, Uranium Energy Corp.
(UEC) delivered a total return of +366. 8%, compared to +99. 6% for ASP Isotopes Inc. Common Stock (ASPI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: UEC returned +1978% versus ASPI's +99. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — ASPI or UUUU or UEC or DNN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Denison Mines Corp.
(DNN) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 38β versus ASP Isotopes Inc. Common Stock's 2. 70β — meaning ASPI is approximately 95% more volatile than DNN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Uranium Energy Corp. (UEC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 167% for Denison Mines Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — ASPI or UUUU or UEC or DNN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Uranium Energy Corp.
(UEC) is pulling ahead at 297. 4% versus -15. 6% for Energy Fuels Inc. (UUUU). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: ASP Isotopes Inc. Common Stock grew EPS -28. 6% year-over-year, compared to -172. 1% for Uranium Energy Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, UUUU leads at 74. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — ASPI or UUUU or UEC or DNN?
Energy Fuels Inc.
(UUUU) is the more profitable company, earning -129. 9% net margin versus -44. 2% for Denison Mines Corp. — meaning it keeps -129. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: UEC leads at -109. 7% versus -1748. 4% for DNN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ASPI leads at 38. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — ASPI or UUUU or UEC or DNN?
In this comparison, ASPI (100.
0% yield) pays a dividend. UUUU, UEC, DNN do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is ASPI or UUUU or UEC or DNN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Uranium Energy Corp.
(UEC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+1978% 10Y return). ASP Isotopes Inc. Common Stock (ASPI) carries a higher beta of 2. 70 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (UEC: +1978%, ASPI: +99. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between ASPI and UUUU and UEC and DNN?
These companies operate in different sectors (ASPI (Basic Materials) and UUUU (Energy) and UEC (Energy) and DNN (Energy)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: ASPI is a small-cap high-growth stock; UUUU is a small-cap quality compounder stock; UEC is a small-cap high-growth stock; DNN is a small-cap high-growth stock. ASPI pays a dividend while UUUU, UEC, DNN do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.