Construction
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
ASPN vs KALU
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Aluminum
ASPN vs KALU — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Construction | Aluminum |
| Market Cap | $341M | $2.92B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $271M | $3.70B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-390M | $153M |
| Gross Margin | 17.0% | 10.2% |
| Operating Margin | -19.0% | 6.6% |
| Forward P/E | — | 19.2x |
| Total Debt | $144M | $1.12B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $157M | $7M |
ASPN vs KALU — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aspen Aerogels, Inc. (ASPN) | 100 | 66.5 | -33.5% |
| Kaiser Aluminum Cor… (KALU) | 100 | 251.5 | +151.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ASPN vs KALU
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ASPN is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.92, Low D/E 61.0%, current ratio 3.90x
KALU carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.71, yield 1.7%
- Rev growth 11.5%, EPS growth 135.9%, 3Y rev CAGR -0.5%
- 128.7% 10Y total return vs ASPN's -8.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 11.5% revenue growth vs ASPN's -40.1% | |
| Quality / Margins | 4.1% margin vs ASPN's -143.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.71 vs ASPN's 1.92 | |
| Dividends | 1.7% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +171.3% vs ASPN's -25.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.9% ROA vs ASPN's -78.8%, ROIC 7.8% vs -9.5% |
ASPN vs KALU — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
ASPN vs KALU — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KALU leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KALU is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.7B annually — 13.7x ASPN's $271M. KALU is the more profitable business, keeping 4.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ASPN's -143.7%. On growth, KALU holds the edge at +42.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $271M | $3.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$6M | $368M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$390M | $153M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$5M | $24M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +17.0% | +10.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -19.0% | +6.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -143.7% | +4.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -1.7% | +0.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -66.4% | +42.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -7.3% | +183.2% |
Valuation Metrics
ASPN leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $341M | $2.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $328M | $4.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.87x | 26.65x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 19.19x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.88x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 12.90x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.26x | 0.87x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.45x | 3.63x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
KALU leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KALU delivers a 18.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $19 in annual profit, vs $-134 for ASPN. ASPN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.61x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KALU's 1.36x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KALU scores 6/9 vs ASPN's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -133.8% | +18.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -78.8% | +5.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -9.5% | +7.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -9.1% | +9.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.61x | 1.36x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$13M | $1.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $157M | $7M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $144M | $1.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -35.13x | 4.84x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
KALU leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in KALU five years ago would be worth $14,224 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,225 for ASPN. Over the past 12 months, KALU leads with a +171.3% total return vs ASPN's -25.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors KALU at 44.3% vs ASPN's -19.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +42.6% | +51.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -25.1% | +171.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -47.8% | +200.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -77.8% | +42.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -8.4% | +128.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -19.5% | +44.3% |
Risk & Volatility
KALU leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KALU is the less volatile stock with a 1.71 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ASPN's 1.92 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KALU currently trades 98.6% from its 52-week high vs ASPN's 42.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.92x | 1.71x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $9.78 | $183.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.30 | $65.69 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +42.1% | +98.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 61.9 | 71.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.6M | 247K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates ASPN as "Buy" and KALU as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 645.4% upside for ASPN (target: $31) vs -11.3% for KALU (target: $160). KALU is the only dividend payer here at 1.71% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $30.71 | $160.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 23 | 22 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $3.09 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
KALU leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ASPN leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
ASPN vs KALU: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ASPN or KALU a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Kaiser Aluminum Corporation (KALU) is the stronger pick with 11.
5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -40. 1% for Aspen Aerogels, Inc. (ASPN). Kaiser Aluminum Corporation (KALU) offers the better valuation at 26. 6x trailing P/E (19. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Aspen Aerogels, Inc. (ASPN) a "Buy" — based on 23 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — ASPN or KALU?
Over the past 5 years, Kaiser Aluminum Corporation (KALU) delivered a total return of +42.
2%, compared to -77. 8% for Aspen Aerogels, Inc. (ASPN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KALU returned +128. 7% versus ASPN's -8. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — ASPN or KALU?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Kaiser Aluminum Corporation (KALU) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
71β versus Aspen Aerogels, Inc. 's 1. 92β — meaning ASPN is approximately 12% more volatile than KALU relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Aspen Aerogels, Inc. (ASPN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 61% versus 136% for Kaiser Aluminum Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — ASPN or KALU?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Kaiser Aluminum Corporation (KALU) is pulling ahead at 11.
5% versus -40. 1% for Aspen Aerogels, Inc. (ASPN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Kaiser Aluminum Corporation grew EPS 135. 9% year-over-year, compared to -28. 9% for Aspen Aerogels, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ASPN leads at 14. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — ASPN or KALU?
Kaiser Aluminum Corporation (KALU) is the more profitable company, earning 3.
3% net margin versus -143. 7% for Aspen Aerogels, Inc. — meaning it keeps 3. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KALU leads at 5. 7% versus -19. 0% for ASPN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ASPN leads at 17. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is ASPN or KALU more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ASPN: 645.
4% to $30. 71.
07Which pays a better dividend — ASPN or KALU?
In this comparison, KALU (1.
7% yield) pays a dividend. ASPN does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is ASPN or KALU better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Kaiser Aluminum Corporation (KALU) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (1.
7% yield, +128. 7% 10Y return). Aspen Aerogels, Inc. (ASPN) carries a higher beta of 1. 92 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (KALU: +128. 7%, ASPN: -8. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between ASPN and KALU?
These companies operate in different sectors (ASPN (Industrials) and KALU (Basic Materials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
KALU pays a dividend while ASPN does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.