ASTH vs AGL

For growth investors, Astrana Health, Inc.

(ASTH) is the stronger pick with 56. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 1% for Agilon Health, Inc. (AGL). Astrana Health, Inc. (ASTH) offers the better valuation at 78. 4x trailing P/E (29. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Astrana Health, Inc. (ASTH) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

Over the past 5 years, Astrana Health, Inc.

(ASTH) delivered a total return of +7. 8%, compared to -92. 8% for Agilon Health, Inc. (AGL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ASTH returned +614. 5% versus AGL's -92. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Astrana Health, Inc.

(ASTH) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 11β versus Agilon Health, Inc. 's 2. 98β — meaning AGL is approximately 169% more volatile than ASTH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Agilon Health, Inc. (AGL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 29% versus 193% for Astrana Health, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Astrana Health, Inc.

(ASTH) is pulling ahead at 56. 4% versus -2. 1% for Agilon Health, Inc. (AGL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Astrana Health, Inc. grew EPS -48. 9% year-over-year, compared to -55. 6% for Agilon Health, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ASTH leads at 40. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Astrana Health, Inc.

(ASTH) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 7% net margin versus -6. 8% for Agilon Health, Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ASTH leads at 2. 5% versus -7. 1% for AGL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ASTH leads at 9. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ASTH: -5.

2% to $34. 20.

In this comparison, ASTH (0.

4% yield) pays a dividend. AGL does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Astrana Health, Inc.

(ASTH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 11), +614. 5% 10Y return). Agilon Health, Inc. (AGL) carries a higher beta of 2. 98 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ASTH: +614. 5%, AGL: -92. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: ASTH is a small-cap high-growth stock; AGL is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.