Solar
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
ASTI vs BE vs PLUG vs ARRY
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Electrical Equipment & Parts
Electrical Equipment & Parts
Solar
ASTI vs BE vs PLUG vs ARRY — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Solar | Electrical Equipment & Parts | Electrical Equipment & Parts | Solar |
| Market Cap | $18M | $62.18B | $4.36B | $1.25B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $2.45B | $710M | $1.21B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-8M | $6M | $-1.63B | $-67M |
| Gross Margin | — | 31.1% | 99.8% | 22.4% |
| Operating Margin | — | 8.2% | 38.1% | 4.5% |
| Forward P/E | — | 123.6x | — | 11.7x |
| Total Debt | $1M | $2.99B | $997M | $766M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3M | $2.45B | $1M | $244M |
ASTI vs BE vs PLUG vs ARRY — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ascent Solar Techno… (ASTI) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
| Bloom Energy Corpor… (BE) | 100 | 2046.2 | +1946.2% |
| Plug Power Inc. (PLUG) | 100 | 22.4 | -77.6% |
| Array Technologies,… (ARRY) | 100 | 22.3 | -77.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ASTI vs BE vs PLUG vs ARRY
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ASTI plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
BE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 9.3% 10Y total return vs PLUG's 62.2%
- 0.2% margin vs PLUG's -229.8%
- +14.6% vs ARRY's +62.7%
- 0.2% ROA vs ASTI's -125.0%, ROIC 4.1% vs -275.5%
PLUG lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
ARRY is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 2.32
- Rev growth 40.2%, EPS growth 62.6%, 3Y rev CAGR -7.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 2.32, current ratio 2.31x
- Beta 2.32, current ratio 2.31x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 40.2% revenue growth vs ASTI's -100.0% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 0.2% margin vs PLUG's -229.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 2.32 vs ASTI's 4.28 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +14.6% vs ARRY's +62.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 0.2% ROA vs ASTI's -125.0%, ROIC 4.1% vs -275.5% |
ASTI vs BE vs PLUG vs ARRY — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
ASTI vs BE vs PLUG vs ARRY — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
BE leads in 2 of 6 categories
ARRY leads 1 • ASTI leads 0 • PLUG leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BE and ASTI operate at a comparable scale, with $2.4B and $0 in trailing revenue. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 0.2% (BE) to -2.3% (PLUG). On growth, BE holds the edge at +130.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $2.4B | $710M | $1.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$8M | $240M | -$1.5B | $95M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$8M | $6M | -$1.6B | -$67M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$7M | $233M | -$2M | $58M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +31.1% | +99.8% | +22.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +8.2% | +38.1% | +4.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | +0.2% | -2.3% | -5.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +9.5% | -0.3% | +4.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +130.4% | +17.6% | -26.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +83.3% | +3.3% | +95.9% | -7.0% |
Valuation Metrics
ARRY leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, ARRY's 13.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BE's 508.4x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $18M | $62.2B | $4.4B | $1.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $17M | $62.7B | $5.4B | $1.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.26x | -699.03x | — | -11.23x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 123.56x | — | 11.75x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 508.37x | — | 13.50x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 30.72x | 6.14x | 0.98x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.97x | 78.41x | — | 4.80x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 1087.24x | — | 15.72x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — ASTI and BE and PLUG each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BE delivers a 0.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $1 in annual profit, vs $-3 for ASTI. ASTI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.44x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PLUG's 19.75x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PLUG scores 5/9 vs ASTI's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.6% | +0.8% | -124.4% | -20.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -125.0% | +0.2% | -64.3% | -4.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -2.8% | +4.1% | +10.9% | +9.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -175.1% | +2.5% | +18.6% | +8.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.44x | 3.77x | 19.75x | 2.94x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$1M | $538M | $996M | $522M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3M | $2.5B | $1M | $244M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1M | $3.0B | $997M | $766M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 1.05x | -36.18x | -2.42x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BE leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BE five years ago would be worth $111,339 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $0 for ASTI. Over the past 12 months, BE leads with a +1464.7% total return vs ARRY's +62.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BE at 148.0% vs ASTI's -90.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -4.4% | +162.1% | +40.4% | -15.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +109.7% | +1464.7% | +303.6% | +62.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.9% | +1425.9% | -66.3% | -56.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | +1013.4% | -86.4% | -67.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | +934.6% | +62.2% | -77.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -90.7% | +148.0% | -30.4% | -24.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BE and ARRY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ARRY is the less volatile stock with a 2.32 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ASTI's 4.28 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BE currently trades 85.4% from its 52-week high vs ASTI's 39.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 4.28x | 3.61x | 2.57x | 2.32x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $9.87 | $302.99 | $4.58 | $12.23 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.10 | $16.18 | $0.69 | $4.92 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +39.3% | +85.4% | +68.3% | +67.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 47.3 | 72.6 | 63.3 | 56.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.2M | 10.1M | 76.5M | 6.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — ASTI and ARRY each lead in 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BE as "Buy", PLUG as "Buy", ARRY as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 24.9% upside for PLUG (target: $4) vs -27.5% for BE (target: $188).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $187.56 | $3.91 | $9.17 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 31 | 38 | 28 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.0% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.00 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
BE leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). ARRY leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
ASTI vs BE vs PLUG vs ARRY: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ASTI or BE or PLUG or ARRY a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Array Technologies, Inc.
(ARRY) is the stronger pick with 40. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Ascent Solar Technologies, Inc. Common Stock (ASTI). Analysts rate Bloom Energy Corporation (BE) a "Buy" — based on 31 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — ASTI or BE or PLUG or ARRY?
Over the past 5 years, Bloom Energy Corporation (BE) delivered a total return of +1013%, compared to -100.
0% for Ascent Solar Technologies, Inc. Common Stock (ASTI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BE returned +934. 6% versus ASTI's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — ASTI or BE or PLUG or ARRY?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Array Technologies, Inc.
(ARRY) is the lower-risk stock at 2. 32β versus Ascent Solar Technologies, Inc. Common Stock's 4. 28β — meaning ASTI is approximately 85% more volatile than ARRY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Ascent Solar Technologies, Inc. Common Stock (ASTI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 44% versus 20% for Plug Power Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — ASTI or BE or PLUG or ARRY?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Array Technologies, Inc.
(ARRY) is pulling ahead at 40. 2% versus -100. 0% for Ascent Solar Technologies, Inc. Common Stock (ASTI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Plug Power Inc. grew EPS 100. 0% year-over-year, compared to -184. 6% for Bloom Energy Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, BE leads at 19. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — ASTI or BE or PLUG or ARRY?
Ascent Solar Technologies, Inc.
Common Stock (ASTI) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -229. 8% for Plug Power Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PLUG leads at 38. 1% versus 0. 0% for ASTI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PLUG leads at 99. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is ASTI or BE or PLUG or ARRY more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Array Technologies, Inc.
(ARRY) trades at 11. 7x forward P/E versus 123. 6x for Bloom Energy Corporation — 111. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PLUG: 24. 9% to $3. 91.
07Which pays a better dividend — ASTI or BE or PLUG or ARRY?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is ASTI or BE or PLUG or ARRY better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Bloom Energy Corporation (BE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+934.
6% 10Y return). Ascent Solar Technologies, Inc. Common Stock (ASTI) carries a higher beta of 4. 28 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (BE: +934. 6%, ASTI: -100. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between ASTI and BE and PLUG and ARRY?
These companies operate in different sectors (ASTI (Energy) and BE (Industrials) and PLUG (Industrials) and ARRY (Energy)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: ASTI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BE is a mid-cap high-growth stock; PLUG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ARRY is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.