Semiconductors
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
ASX vs ICHR vs MKSI vs AMKR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Semiconductors
Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Semiconductors
ASX vs ICHR vs MKSI vs AMKR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Semiconductors | Semiconductors | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Semiconductors |
| Market Cap | $74.84B | $2.59B | $21.09B | $18.98B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $666.14B | $959M | $4.07B | $7.07B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $47.13B | $-51M | $327M | $436M |
| Gross Margin | 18.3% | 11.3% | 45.2% | 14.4% |
| Operating Margin | 8.8% | -3.8% | 14.8% | 7.6% |
| Forward P/E | 1.0x | 54.0x | 27.3x | 36.1x |
| Total Debt | $264.10B | $186M | $4.69B | $1.57B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $92.47B | $98M | $675M | $1.38B |
ASX vs ICHR vs MKSI vs AMKR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| ASE Technology Hold… (ASX) | 100 | 839.0 | +739.0% |
| Ichor Holdings, Ltd. (ICHR) | 100 | 327.1 | +227.1% |
| MKS Inc. (MKSI) | 100 | 296.5 | +196.5% |
| Amkor Technology, I… (AMKR) | 100 | 724.1 | +624.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ASX vs ICHR vs MKSI vs AMKR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ASX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.60, yield 1.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.60, Low D/E 70.7%, current ratio 1.28x
- PEG 0.13 vs AMKR's 25.97
- Beta 1.60, yield 1.0%, current ratio 1.28x
ICHR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth and momentum is your priority.
- 11.6% revenue growth vs AMKR's 6.2%
- +345.1% vs ASX's +276.8%
MKSI is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 9.6%, EPS growth 55.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.5%
- 8.0% margin vs ICHR's -5.3%
AMKR is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 13.0% 10Y total return vs ASX's 7.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 11.6% revenue growth vs AMKR's 6.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (1.0x vs 36.1x), PEG 0.13 vs 25.97 | |
| Quality / Margins | 8.0% margin vs ICHR's -5.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.60 vs ICHR's 3.78 | |
| Dividends | 1.0% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs MKSI's 0.3%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +345.1% vs ASX's +276.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.5% ROA vs ICHR's -5.2%, ROIC 7.6% vs -3.9% |
ASX vs ICHR vs MKSI vs AMKR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
ASX vs ICHR vs MKSI vs AMKR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ASX leads in 4 of 6 categories
MKSI leads 1 • ICHR leads 1 • AMKR leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MKSI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ASX is the larger business by revenue, generating $666.1B annually — 694.4x ICHR's $959M. MKSI is the more profitable business, keeping 8.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ICHR's -5.3%. On growth, AMKR holds the edge at +27.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $666.1B | $959M | $4.1B | $7.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $127.9B | -$11M | $945M | $1.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $47.1B | -$51M | $327M | $436M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$6.2B | -$17M | $401M | $392M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +18.3% | +11.3% | +45.2% | +14.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +8.8% | -3.8% | +14.8% | +7.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +7.1% | -5.3% | +8.0% | +6.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -0.9% | -1.7% | +9.8% | +5.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +17.4% | +4.7% | +15.2% | +27.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +95.1% | +46.2% | +53.2% | +2.9% |
Valuation Metrics
ICHR leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 51.1x trailing earnings, AMKR trades at a 29% valuation discount to MKSI's 71.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), ASX offers better value at 7.36x vs AMKR's 36.76x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $74.8B | $2.6B | $21.1B | $19.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $80.3B | $2.7B | $25.1B | $19.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 58.15x | -48.32x | 71.67x | 51.07x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 1.04x | 53.98x | 27.27x | 36.08x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 7.36x | — | — | 36.76x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 21.20x | — | 27.62x | 17.28x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.62x | 2.73x | 5.36x | 2.83x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 6.37x | 3.84x | 7.80x | 4.22x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 42.43x | 99.40x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ASX leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ASX delivers a 13.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $-8 for ICHR. ICHR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.28x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MKSI's 1.73x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ASX scores 6/9 vs ICHR's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +13.4% | -7.5% | +12.2% | +9.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.5% | -5.2% | +3.7% | +5.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.6% | -3.9% | +6.5% | +7.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +8.9% | -4.7% | +7.2% | +7.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 3 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.71x | 0.28x | 1.73x | 0.35x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $171.6B | $87M | $4.0B | $187M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $92.5B | $98M | $675M | $1.4B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $264.1B | $186M | $4.7B | $1.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 10.27x | -5.97x | 2.84x | 7.39x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ASX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ASX five years ago would be worth $46,812 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $14,598 for ICHR. Over the past 12 months, ICHR leads with a +345.1% total return vs ASX's +276.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ASX at 71.1% vs ICHR's 37.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +103.0% | +264.6% | +86.2% | +78.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +276.8% | +345.1% | +306.4% | +327.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +400.9% | +162.3% | +281.0% | +264.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +368.1% | +46.0% | +82.1% | +308.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +703.9% | +661.7% | +784.8% | +1299.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +71.1% | +37.9% | +56.2% | +53.9% |
Risk & Volatility
ASX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ASX is the less volatile stock with a 1.60 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ICHR's 3.78 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ASX currently trades 99.8% from its 52-week high vs MKSI's 95.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.60x | 3.78x | 2.56x | 2.90x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $34.30 | $75.35 | $326.83 | $79.23 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $9.12 | $13.12 | $73.21 | $17.59 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.8% | +98.8% | +95.8% | +96.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 73.8 | 64.2 | 68.0 | 60.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 6.9M | 791K | 1.2M | 4.0M |
Analyst Outlook
ASX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ASX as "Buy", ICHR as "Buy", MKSI as "Buy", AMKR as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply -6.1% upside for MKSI (target: $294) vs -26.6% for ICHR (target: $55). For income investors, ASX offers the higher dividend yield at 0.97% vs MKSI's 0.28%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $54.60 | $294.25 | $66.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 14 | 29 | 14 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.0% | — | +0.3% | +0.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $10.46 | — | $0.87 | $0.33 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.2% | 0.0% |
ASX leads in 4 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). MKSI leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow).
ASX vs ICHR vs MKSI vs AMKR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ASX or ICHR or MKSI or AMKR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Ichor Holdings, Ltd.
(ICHR) is the stronger pick with 11. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 6. 2% for Amkor Technology, Inc. (AMKR). Amkor Technology, Inc. (AMKR) offers the better valuation at 51. 1x trailing P/E (36. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate ASE Technology Holding Co. , Ltd. (ASX) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ASX or ICHR or MKSI or AMKR?
On trailing P/E, Amkor Technology, Inc.
(AMKR) is the cheapest at 51. 1x versus MKS Inc. at 71. 7x. On forward P/E, ASE Technology Holding Co. , Ltd. is actually cheaper at 1. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: ASE Technology Holding Co. , Ltd. wins at 0. 13x versus Amkor Technology, Inc. 's 25. 97x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ASX or ICHR or MKSI or AMKR?
Over the past 5 years, ASE Technology Holding Co.
, Ltd. (ASX) delivered a total return of +368. 1%, compared to +46. 0% for Ichor Holdings, Ltd. (ICHR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AMKR returned +1299% versus ICHR's +661. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ASX or ICHR or MKSI or AMKR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), ASE Technology Holding Co.
, Ltd. (ASX) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 60β versus Ichor Holdings, Ltd. 's 3. 78β — meaning ICHR is approximately 136% more volatile than ASX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Ichor Holdings, Ltd. (ICHR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 28% versus 173% for MKS Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ASX or ICHR or MKSI or AMKR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Ichor Holdings, Ltd.
(ICHR) is pulling ahead at 11. 6% versus 6. 2% for Amkor Technology, Inc. (AMKR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: MKS Inc. grew EPS 55. 5% year-over-year, compared to -140. 6% for Ichor Holdings, Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MKSI leads at 3. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ASX or ICHR or MKSI or AMKR?
MKS Inc.
(MKSI) is the more profitable company, earning 7. 5% net margin versus -5. 6% for Ichor Holdings, Ltd. — meaning it keeps 7. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MKSI leads at 14. 4% versus -4. 1% for ICHR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MKSI leads at 40. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ASX or ICHR or MKSI or AMKR more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, ASE Technology Holding Co. , Ltd. (ASX) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 13x versus Amkor Technology, Inc. 's 25. 97x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, ASE Technology Holding Co. , Ltd. (ASX) trades at 1. 0x forward P/E versus 54. 0x for Ichor Holdings, Ltd. — 52. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MKSI: -6. 1% to $294. 25.
08Which pays a better dividend — ASX or ICHR or MKSI or AMKR?
In this comparison, ASX (1.
0% yield), AMKR (0. 4% yield), MKSI (0. 3% yield) pay a dividend. ICHR does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ASX or ICHR or MKSI or AMKR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, ASE Technology Holding Co.
, Ltd. (ASX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (1. 0% yield, +703. 9% 10Y return). Ichor Holdings, Ltd. (ICHR) carries a higher beta of 3. 78 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ASX: +703. 9%, ICHR: +661. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ASX and ICHR and MKSI and AMKR?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
ASX pays a dividend while ICHR, MKSI, AMKR do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.