Medical - Diagnostics & Research
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
ATLN vs HURN vs KFRC vs WDAY
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Consulting Services
Staffing & Employment Services
Software - Application
ATLN vs HURN vs KFRC vs WDAY — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Diagnostics & Research | Consulting Services | Staffing & Employment Services | Software - Application |
| Market Cap | $118M | $2.02B | $790M | $34.48B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $436M | $1.74B | $1.33B | $9.55B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-59M | $104M | $35M | $693M |
| Gross Margin | 10.6% | 23.3% | 27.2% | 75.7% |
| Operating Margin | -11.5% | 11.3% | 3.8% | 8.9% |
| Forward P/E | — | 14.2x | 18.0x | 12.5x |
| Total Debt | $38M | $548M | $70M | $834M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $81K | $25M | $2M | $1.50B |
ATLN vs HURN vs KFRC vs WDAY — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Aug 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Atlantic Internatio… (ATLN) | 100 | 0.7 | -99.3% |
| Huron Consulting Gr… (HURN) | 100 | 252.7 | +152.7% |
| Kforce Inc. (KFRC) | 100 | 74.0 | -26.0% |
| Workday, Inc. (WDAY) | 100 | 47.9 | -52.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ATLN vs HURN vs KFRC vs WDAY
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ATLN lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
HURN is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 14.3%, EPS growth -6.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 14.5%
- 14.3% revenue growth vs KFRC's -5.4%
KFRC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 8 yrs, beta 0.53, yield 3.6%
- 195.5% 10Y total return vs HURN's 116.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.53, Low D/E 56.0%, current ratio 1.78x
- Beta 0.53, yield 3.6%, current ratio 1.78x
WDAY is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value and quality is your priority.
- Lower P/E (12.5x vs 18.0x)
- 7.3% margin vs ATLN's -13.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 14.3% revenue growth vs KFRC's -5.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (12.5x vs 18.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 7.3% margin vs ATLN's -13.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.53 vs ATLN's 1.09 | |
| Dividends | 3.6% yield; 8-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +18.9% vs ATLN's -51.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 9.2% ROA vs ATLN's -54.4%, ROIC 19.1% vs -98.9% |
ATLN vs HURN vs KFRC vs WDAY — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
ATLN vs HURN vs KFRC vs WDAY — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
KFRC leads in 2 of 6 categories
WDAY leads 1 • HURN leads 1 • ATLN leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WDAY leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WDAY is the larger business by revenue, generating $9.6B annually — 21.9x ATLN's $436M. WDAY is the more profitable business, keeping 7.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ATLN's -13.6%. On growth, WDAY holds the edge at +14.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $436M | $1.7B | $1.3B | $9.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$44M | $231M | $56M | $1.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$59M | $104M | $35M | $693M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$4M | $124M | $43M | $2.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +10.6% | +23.3% | +27.2% | +75.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -11.5% | +11.3% | +3.8% | +8.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -13.6% | +6.0% | +2.6% | +7.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -1.0% | +7.1% | +3.3% | +29.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -7.3% | +14.2% | +0.1% | +14.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +62.8% | +0.8% | +2.2% | +57.1% |
Valuation Metrics
HURN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 21.4x trailing earnings, HURN trades at a 58% valuation discount to WDAY's 50.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, HURN's 11.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than WDAY's 24.7x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $118M | $2.0B | $790M | $34.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $157M | $2.5B | $858M | $33.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.38x | 21.37x | 22.05x | 50.73x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 14.18x | 17.96x | 12.48x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 10.99x | 15.42x | 24.66x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.27x | 1.19x | 0.59x | 3.61x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 4.25x | 6.17x | 4.42x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 11.06x | 16.88x | 12.41x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — KFRC and WDAY each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KFRC delivers a 27.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $27 in annual profit, vs $9 for WDAY. WDAY carries lower financial leverage with a 0.11x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HURN's 1.04x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WDAY scores 8/9 vs KFRC's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +21.8% | +27.2% | +8.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -54.4% | +6.8% | +9.2% | +3.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -98.9% | +15.0% | +19.1% | +8.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -4.2% | +18.6% | +20.1% | +8.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 1.04x | 0.56x | 0.11x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $38M | $524M | $68M | -$667M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $81,134 | $25M | $2M | $1.5B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $38M | $548M | $70M | $834M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -5.48x | 7.70x | — | 12.60x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — HURN and KFRC each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HURN five years ago would be worth $22,023 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $82 for ATLN. Over the past 12 months, KFRC leads with a +18.9% total return vs ATLN's -51.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HURN at 17.6% vs ATLN's -55.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -27.0% | -27.1% | +39.2% | -36.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -51.9% | -17.2% | +18.9% | -47.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -91.3% | +62.5% | -13.8% | -27.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.2% | +120.2% | -16.8% | -44.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.2% | +116.8% | +195.5% | +86.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -55.6% | +17.6% | -4.8% | -10.0% |
Risk & Volatility
KFRC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KFRC is the less volatile stock with a 0.53 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ATLN's 1.09 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KFRC currently trades 91.0% from its 52-week high vs ATLN's 28.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.09x | 0.82x | 0.53x | 0.71x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $5.25 | $186.78 | $47.48 | $276.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.16 | $112.45 | $24.49 | $110.39 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +28.4% | +66.8% | +91.0% | +47.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 36.1 | 37.4 | 65.6 | 46.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 373K | 243K | 305K | 5.0M |
Analyst Outlook
KFRC leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: HURN as "Buy", KFRC as "Hold", WDAY as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 64.3% upside for KFRC (target: $71) vs 51.2% for WDAY (target: $198). KFRC is the only dividend payer here at 3.58% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $200.00 | $71.00 | $197.90 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 9 | 10 | 80 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +3.6% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 | 8 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $1.55 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +8.2% | +6.4% | +8.4% |
KFRC leads in 2 of 6 categories (Risk & Volatility, Analyst Outlook). WDAY leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
ATLN vs HURN vs KFRC vs WDAY: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ATLN or HURN or KFRC or WDAY a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Huron Consulting Group Inc.
(HURN) is the stronger pick with 14. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 4% for Kforce Inc. (KFRC). Huron Consulting Group Inc. (HURN) offers the better valuation at 21. 4x trailing P/E (14. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Huron Consulting Group Inc. (HURN) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ATLN or HURN or KFRC or WDAY?
On trailing P/E, Huron Consulting Group Inc.
(HURN) is the cheapest at 21. 4x versus Workday, Inc. at 50. 7x. On forward P/E, Workday, Inc. is actually cheaper at 12. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ATLN or HURN or KFRC or WDAY?
Over the past 5 years, Huron Consulting Group Inc.
(HURN) delivered a total return of +120. 2%, compared to -99. 2% for Atlantic International Corp. (ATLN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KFRC returned +195. 5% versus ATLN's -99. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ATLN or HURN or KFRC or WDAY?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Kforce Inc.
(KFRC) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 53β versus Atlantic International Corp. 's 1. 09β — meaning ATLN is approximately 105% more volatile than KFRC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Workday, Inc. (WDAY) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 11% versus 104% for Huron Consulting Group Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ATLN or HURN or KFRC or WDAY?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Huron Consulting Group Inc.
(HURN) is pulling ahead at 14. 3% versus -5. 4% for Kforce Inc. (KFRC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Atlantic International Corp. grew EPS 70. 7% year-over-year, compared to -25. 2% for Kforce Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, WDAY leads at 15. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ATLN or HURN or KFRC or WDAY?
Workday, Inc.
(WDAY) is the more profitable company, earning 7. 3% net margin versus -13. 6% for Atlantic International Corp. — meaning it keeps 7. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HURN leads at 11. 7% versus -11. 5% for ATLN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — WDAY leads at 75. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ATLN or HURN or KFRC or WDAY more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Workday, Inc.
(WDAY) trades at 12. 5x forward P/E versus 18. 0x for Kforce Inc. — 5. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KFRC: 64. 3% to $71. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — ATLN or HURN or KFRC or WDAY?
In this comparison, KFRC (3.
6% yield) pays a dividend. ATLN, HURN, WDAY do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ATLN or HURN or KFRC or WDAY better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Kforce Inc.
(KFRC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 53), 3. 6% yield, +195. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KFRC: +195. 5%, ATLN: -99. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ATLN and HURN and KFRC and WDAY?
These companies operate in different sectors (ATLN (Healthcare) and HURN (Industrials) and KFRC (Industrials) and WDAY (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: ATLN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HURN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; KFRC is a small-cap income-oriented stock; WDAY is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. KFRC pays a dividend while ATLN, HURN, WDAY do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.